Just the one stopping Iran from getting nukes is it! And again, we're not talking about regime change or any kind of invasion. We're talking about a few B-2 bomber runs to destroy the nuke facility in Fordow just outside of Tehran. The Israeli's can handle anything else that's needed. That's much more of an immediate need than spending another dime defending Ukraine, who has clearly shown that they have no interest whatsoever in a peaceful settlement with Russia, so as far as Trump is concerned, we really have no need to keep funding their war until they lose enough territory to Russia forces them to the peace table.Cedar » 17 Jun 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ How many foreign wars do you want to fund at one time?
I don’t want to get involved in another foreign war, I don’t hate Jews. Both can be true.
You better think this through. If you bomb Uranium enrichment facilities, where there may be 70% weapons grade material, enough to build 9 nuclear weapons, what happens to that after the bomb goes off, Israel leaves and the US has moved on to having a space war with China? I'll tell you what happens:Zeets2 » 17 Jun 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Just the one stopping Iran from getting nukes is it! And again, we're not talking about regime change or any kind of invasion. We're talking about a few B-2 bomber runs to destroy the nuke facility in Fordow just outside of Tehran. The Israeli's can handle anything else that's needed. That's much more of an immediate need than spending another dime defending Ukraine, who has clearly shown that they have no interest whatsoever in a peaceful settlement with Russia, so as far as Trump is concerned, we really have no need to keep funding their war until they lose enough territory to Russia forces them to the peace table.
Life is like a bunch of Russians. You never know which one isn't mafia.
I would think that once it's destroyed, Iran will sue for peace or the theocracy will be overthrown. Part of any peace treaty with both Israel and the US would certainly include that any recovery of fissionable material will be done by the IAEA or the US alone. And I believe this is the reason that the Iranian oil industry has yet to be destroyed by Israel. That's the sword that will be hanging over the heads of Iranian mullahs to accept those terms or watch their entire capacity for their economy be destroyed.Skans » 17 Jun 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You better think this through. If you bomb Uranium enrichment facilities, where there may be 70% weapons grade material, enough to build 9 nuclear weapons, what happens to that after the bomb goes off, Israel leaves and the US has moved on to having a space war with China? I'll tell you what happens:Then, good luck trying to put that genie back in the bottle.
- Some terrorist cell with bulldozers and Geiger counters dig up that fissionable material.
- They sell it to Yemen, Burkina Fazo and a Mexican Drug cartel.
This is Israel's war. Israel need to put boots on the ground and recover that fissionable material I don't mind the US supporting an operation like this with intel, equipment and ordnance. But, its up to the Israelis to get the job done and get it done right. It will be on THEM if they half-*** this and leave fissionable uranium laying around like Joe Biden left military equipment in Afghanistan.
Do you trust the Iranian Mullahs to stick with any "deal"?Zeets2 » 17 Jun 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I would think that once it's destroyed, Iran will sue for peace or the theocracy will be overthrown. Part of any peace treaty with both Israel and the US would certainly include that any recovery of fissionable material will be done by the IAEA or the US alone. And I believe this is the reason that the Iranian oil industry has yet to be destroyed by Israel. That's the sword that will be hanging over the heads of Iranian mullahs to accept those terms or watch their entire capacity for their economy be destroyed.
Simple, no?
When the alternative is watching their oil industry be wiped out, OR having a precision missile targeting their office, yes I do!
That's a good point.Zeets2 » 17 Jun 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ When the alternative is watching their oil industry be wiped out, OR having a precision missile targeting their office, yes I do!
Israel wouldn't put up with that kind of **** like we would!
As you can surmise from a few years of my ****, I actually know a couple Iranians. Acquaintances to be sure, but after a few years a bit more than that. Their opinions can resonate as well with me.Cannonpointer » 17 Jun 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ It's almost like your lying eyes just cannot be trusted.
Time after time, year after year, israel sends missiles to murder Iranians and destroy insfrastructure.
And your response? "The Iranians SAID STUFF! They SAID STUFF!!! Every time they get hit with American missiles by an American proxy, THEY KEEP SAYING STUFF!!!"
Israel is a small country, densely populated. The felching homo that started this thread talks quite casually about genocide. But when you actually look at who is sitting pretty for a genocide, it isn't the population of Iran. Iran is 8 times less densely populated than Israel.
Anyone who believes that the axis of evil is going to be allowed to erase Iran - a very necessary nation-state of 90 million souls with its own unique language and culture and a history going back millenia - is simply a **** middle school moron. And by this I mean the OP - not you. As to you, I would simply advise that you start to trust your senses again. They're more reliable than jewish controlled media propaganda, because they are not designed for the express purpose of lying to you. They're actually designed to inform - not misinform. The jewish media, OTOH...
Iranians in the US? Or Iranians in Iran. There is a difference.DeezerShoove » 17 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ As you can surmise from a few years of my ****, I actually know a couple Iranians. Acquaintances to be sure, but after a few years a bit more than that. Their opinions can resonate as well with me.
It's funny how the regular populace of a country somehow doesn't spew the "journalists' analysis". Chinese, Russian, Korean, American... The MSM is **** as hell on a global level IMO.
I end up thinking there are lots of Iranians that wouldn't feel too bad if the religious-****-in-charge took a sabbatical from politicking for a generation or so.
She was teraching that to *** before she taught it to you, son.Skans » 17 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Gee, Dad thanks for explaining to me that condoms break. But, Stepmom-GG taught me about that several years ago!
Skans » 17 Jun 2025, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Iranians in the US? Or Iranians in Iran. There is a difference.
If you would know how Iranians think, go to Iran.DeezerShoove » 17 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ As you can surmise from a few years of my ****, I actually know a couple Iranians. Acquaintances to be sure, but after a few years a bit more than that. Their opinions can resonate as well with me.
It's funny how the regular populace of a country somehow doesn't spew the "journalists' analysis". Chinese, Russian, Korean, American... The MSM is **** as hell on a global level IMO.
I end up thinking there are lots of Iranians that wouldn't feel too bad if the religious-****-in-charge took a sabbatical from politicking for a generation or so.
Oh - and also, she did a **** job because you CLEARLY are incapable of taking the lesson and applying it across domains. Your pre-adolescent pretense that we're not on a collision course with being your masters' goy army is either dishonest or stupid. If I knew which, I would know which insult to use right now.Skans » 17 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Gee, Dad thanks for explaining to me that condoms break. But, Stepmom-GG taught me about that several years ago!
What wrong reasons? We just chat and I don't grill them.Cannonpointer » 17 Jun 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ If you would know how Iranians think, go to Iran.
If you would know how Iranian EXPATS think, you're in the right place and asking the right people the right questions.
But for all the wrong reasons, seems to me.
Why, Daddy, WHY???Cannonpointer » 17 Jun 2025, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ She was teraching that to *** before she taught it to you, son.
Well, perhaps the ones that are still there like it there. Just perhaps the Iranian men like their women wearing burkas, like to have complete dominance over them, like to be allowed to treat them like personal property. After decades of being allowed to do this, do you think they looking to trade it for this......DeezerShoove » 17 Jun 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Admittedly my Iranian acquaintances are escapees.
The difference being what exactly? Enlighten me.
Also, how many freaking Iranians do you know? I knew one once, but he was Christian.