Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

I'll be the first to admit I can't fathom such a heinous act...

and you're right about God...

28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

I don't understand what that's actually supposed to mean; mean to the human race. Cruelty exacted upon the innocent. I will be the first to admit, I've done my share picking on other kids when I was a kid. Nothing all that awful, but cruelty that I regret.  Its bad for the soul, and if I could find those kids, I would sincerely apologize....and maybe get the **** kicked out of me by one of them.  
 
 

Skans » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Toddler murder-by-rape?  Yeah, I think that just happened due to a couple of f-ed up sickos.  Not some Christian debasing social trend.  I just don't see the connection there.

The society debasing social trend I am talking about is the one that is using their mass media empire to promote and enforce all forms of  queerness.
The same people were behind the Hippies, Women's Lib, SJWs, ANTIFA, BLM, etc.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

The society debasing social trend I am talking about is the one that is using their mass media empire to promote and enforce all forms of  queerness.
The same people were behind the Hippies, Women's Lib, SJWs, ANTIFA, BLM, etc.

I'm not arguing that in some cases that may be true.  But, in this case, the one you posted about, you're trying to argue that the lack of publicizing this horrid crime is proof of a societal debasing social trend.  From my view, I'd say its quite the opposite.  Normal people don't need to read this kind of XXX-rated filth for entertainment.   Because, at the end of the day, news and newsy-**** is mostly just entertainment. 

Maybe you think publishing this would get people riled up enough to stop homosexual adoption. There should be better ways to go about that.

I think it makes all of us more numb to horrid filth.  And, I think it also gins some people up to go out and exact vengeance for what happened against innocent homosexuals who had nothing to do with it. That ain't right either.  Look at me - I'm pretty pissed off after seeing this.  It has an affect on people; not necessarily positive. 
 

Skans » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

I'm not arguing that in some cases that may be true.  But, in this case, the one you posted about, you're trying to argue that the lack of publicizing this horrid crime is proof of a societal debasing social trend.  From my view, I'd say its quite the opposite.  Normal people don't need to read this kind of XXX-rated filth for entertainment.   Because, at the end of the day, news and newsy-**** is mostly just entertainment. 

Maybe you think publishing this would get people riled up enough to stop homosexual adoption. There should be better ways to go about that.

I think it makes all of us more numb to horrid filth.  And, I think it also gins some people up to go out and exact vengeance for what happened against innocent homosexuals who had nothing to do with it. That ain't right either.  Look at me - I'm pretty pissed off after seeing this.  It has an affect on people; not necessarily positive.

The [[[JWO / MSM]]] no longer reports race when it is one of their Pet Monkeys....
https://freebeacon.com/media/yes-the-me ... not-white/
The [[[JWO]]] is doing the same thing  for the same reason with their Pet Queers

ROG62 » Today, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:49 pm

But how would anyone know, much less imagine?

You would think they knew the couple were homos

 

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:15 am

and love him to death...

Why wasn't this story given 24 / 7 coverage on the [[[JWO / MSM]]] as soon as the story broke ...?

Wow. 2 members of the Labour Party (Democrat). As if anyone is shocked.

Skans » Today, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:38 pm

I don't understand what that's actually supposed to mean; mean to the human race. Cruelty exacted upon the innocent. I will be the first to admit, I've done my share picking on other kids when I was a kid. Nothing all that awful, but cruelty that I regret.  It's bad for the soul, and if I could find those kids, I would sincerely apologize....and maybe get the **** kicked out of me by one of them.  

w/o God, one becomes reprobate /rĕp′rə-bāt″/
noun

1. A morally unprincipled person. 
2. One who is predestined to damnation. 
3. One morally abandoned and lost.

which we've witnessed in our generation...

with bullies, getting their *** knocked back a notch or two s/b mandatory early in life...

SouthernFried » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

Wow. 2 members of the Labour Party (Democrat). As if anyone is shocked.

as if...
 

RebelGator » Today, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:31 pm

You would think they knew the couple were homos

That part, yes...but (hopefully) not all homos sodomize 1 yo children....  

ROG62 » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

That part, yes...but (hopefully) not all homos sodomize 1 yo children....or any aged child for that matter... 

It would be interesting to 

1]  know what the infant mortality / child abuse rate is in the general population of hetero sexual White / Black . Brown  parents.
[The CDC used to have this info sorted by race but the Obama / Biden Admins were all about hiding the truth..so  the CDC might  not be forthcoming with the truth now]

2] compare the mortality / abuse rates of Queer Male parents to the rates of the hetero parents.
 

ROG62 » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

That part, yes...but (hopefully) not all homos sodomize 1 yo children....or any aged child for that matter... 

Sodomy is a tenant of homosexuality......that alone should negate adoption.

RebelGator » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Sodomy is a tenant of homosexuality......that alone should negate adoption.

True...the only reason I can think of that someone would sodomize a 1yo is getting back at the kid for having the larger penis...
 

This sick **** was probably mr queerly's brother.

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:15 am

and love him to death...

Why wasn't this story given 24 / 7 coverage on the [[[JWO / MSM]]] as soon as the story broke ...?

**** sodomites. Beevee will defend them - in some sleazy way. Probably whataboutism. Certainly deflection.
 

Skans » Today, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:34 pm

FWIW, I really thought this was the opening line to a good joke. Regrettably, no.

I fact checked it, too. Hard to believe it wasn't satire.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:47 pm

**** sodomites. Beevee will defend them - in some sleazy way. Probably whataboutism. Certainly deflection.

good evening CP.
If we could look at 1000 cases of this exact same adoption scenario,,,do you think a pair of queer White Men would be more likely to abuse the child as 1000 straight couples ..? 
Mental illness rate  is much higher among Queers...[as well as with all Liberals in general]
I just looked at the criteria for adoption eligibility and it is a lot looser than what I imagined.......https://www.findlaw.com/family/adoption ... rview.html
I do a better background check than that with tenant applicants
There is also financial incentive to adopt kids via tax credit....which I think  will inevitably encourage Scammers to adopt kids.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

good evening CP.
If we could look at 1000 cases of this exact same adoption scenario,,,do you think a pair of queer White Men would be more likely to abuse the child as 1000 straight couples ..? 
Mental illness rate  is much higher among Queers...[as well as with all Liberals in general]
I just looked at the criteria for adoption eligibility and it is a lot looser than what I imagined.......https://www.findlaw.com/family/adoption ... rview.html
I do a better background check than that with tenant applicants
There is also financial incentive to adopt kids via tax credit....which I think  will inevitably encourage Scammers to adopt kids.

As an adoptive parent to 17 children, I find that deeply offensive!

It reminds me of that time Big Borthers of America implied I might be racist. They asked me if there was a particular RACE of child I wanted to mentor. I told em I didn't give a damn if he was white, black, or brown - so long as he was dressed sexy.
 

Cannonpointer » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

As an adoptive parent to 17 children, I find that deeply offensive!

It reminds me of that time Big Borthers of America implied I might be racist. They asked me if there was a particular RACE of child I wanted to mentor. I told em I didn't give a damn if he was white, black, or brown - so long as he was dressed sexy.

Well when Big Brothers asked ME if I had any experience living around and "relating to" Black children I had to be perfectly honest and tell them...NOT EXACTLY, but I HAVE raised an orphaned Squirrel Monkey .....  

*GHETTOBLASTER » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Well when Big Brothers asked ME if I had any experience living around and "relating to" Black children I had to be perfectly honest and tell them...NOT EXACTLY, but I HAVE raised an orphaned Squirrel Monkey .....

I told em I hadn't mentored any black orphans - but I had made a few...    



Just kiddin - black kids are born orphaned!  
 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:35 pm

w/o God, one becomes reprobate /rĕp′rə-bāt″/
noun

1. A morally unprincipled person. 
2. One who is predestined to damnation. 
3. One morally abandoned and lost.

which we've witnessed in our generation...

with bullies, getting their *** knocked back a notch or two s/b mandatory early in life...

W/O God a person has to navigate living as a sole result of genetic compounding results simply living eternally separate by the DNA and chromosomes delivered when conceived into a DNA stream called a specific ancestral lineage proportionately alive now.

You won't accept this as real because you believe in supernatural intellectual entities that never had a physical body either built by combinations of periodic elements or chromosomes to a specific DNA result present.

Guiding ancestries with hope, faith, charity, yesterday, today, tomorrow 7 days a week since conceived to decomposed corpse, social power, wealth, fame, governing people demanding rights to be left in character chosen after birth on the world stage of events nobody can know the actual time living is balancing at so far.

Doing the same things every generation gap last 400 generation gaps doesn't undo the suggestions handed down all 400 generations.

so what is a physical second coming of understanding where corruption originated? Comprehending compounding chromosomes within the living numbers since inception of original 16 great great grandparent life cycle in the circle of life. up to each great great grandchild being conceived this rotation of the planet.

Eternity is the physical balancing point all things evolving are occupying time today as each remains an ever changing form unable to create or destroy the universe perpetually balancing forward now.

Time and distance lived since added to the continuation of things never same results twice here now. Simple compounding chromosomes works inversely to rule of 72 in compounding yields of every economic theory taxing ancestors to pay to stay in character cradle to grave.