Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:35 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm

You tell me.  I gave you both answers.  The Colt Shorter Semi Auto is listed in the civilian model list.  The Colt Sporter Semi Automatic was NEVER standard combat issue.

The moment you post those that, and another but that, no spin, no questions, and no lies I will start answering your questions again on a one for one basis.  Until you admit you are wrong no questions will be answered.

Tiny,

The minute you name the article in which the lists appear, you lose.....again.



 

 

That's a question I have already answered.  You quote it all the time.  If you do not now what is at that article maybe you should not post it.

I suggest that you stop asking question of me and just make statements until you do this:

You tell me.  I gave you both answers.  The Colt Shorter Semi Auto is listed in the civilian model list.  The Colt Sporter Semi Automatic was NEVER standard combat issue.

The moment you post those that, and nothing but that, no spin, no questions, and no lies I will start answering your questions again on a one for one basis.  Until you admit you are wrong no questions will be answered.
 

Anybody got any Charlie?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aBG2wtD2sE
 

I sense a giant Sorry Charlie Eggplant in our future.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 1:56 pm

You ied.

Now, what list does the Colt Sporter appear on, military or civilian and when was it standard combat issue?

You know where to find the links to the lists.

And you STILL haven't answered...

Now, what list does the Colt Sporter appear on, military or civilian

Are you talking about lists included in the article which begins as follows?

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

If so, it is listed among the civilian variants of the original Colt AR-15. 

and when was it standard combat issue?

The Colt AR-15 was ordered by the USAF in 1962. The original was modified, so as not to be a machine gun.

Acknowledge that you've been answered IN FULL, and AGAIN.
 
 

 

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

You need to post a link to your citation.  

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm

You tell me.

I asked you to specify to which article you are referring. 

I have no idea...you refuse to tell me.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:45 pm

You need to post a link to your citation.

 Why do I need to do that...

Either your article does, or does not, begin as indicated.

Does it?
 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:37 pm

That's a question I have already answered.  

Why does that matter?

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:54 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:32 pm

That's a question I have already answered.  You quote it all the time.  If you do not now what is at that article maybe you should not post it.

I suggest that you stop asking question of me and just make statements until you do this:

You tell me.  I gave you both answers.  The Colt Shorter Semi Auto is listed in the civilian model list.  The Colt Sporter Semi Automatic was NEVER standard combat issue.

The moment you post those that, and nothing but that, no spin, no questions, and no lies I will start answering your questions again on a one for one basis.  Until you admit you are wrong no questions will be answered.
 

I asked you to specify to which article you are referring. 

I have no idea...you refuse to tell me.

 

FIFY.  Trhy again.  I dont deal in edited posts.  
 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:06 pm

Keep Running Lil Timmy.

From what are you now insisting I'm running?


 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:00 pm

FIFY. 

If it is unresponsive, I don't bother...


You're aware of this condition.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:58 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:37 pm

That's a question I have already answered.  You quote it all the time.  If you do not now what is at that article maybe you should not post it.

I suggest that you stop asking question of me and just make statements until you do this:

You tell me.  I gave you both answers.  The Colt Shorter Semi Auto is listed in the civilian model list.  The Colt Sporter Semi Automatic was NEVER standard combat issue.

The moment you post those that, and nothing but that, no spin, no questions, and no lies I will start answering your questions again on a one for one basis.  Until you admit you are wrong no questions will be answered.
 

Why does that matter?

 

FIFY.  Try again.  I do not deal in edited quotes.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:56 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:45 pm

You need to post a link to your citation.

 Why do I need to do that...

Either your article does, or does not, begin as indicated.

Does it?
 

 

I do not see a link to your citation.  Post the link and I will answer.  If not, do what you have done for decades since your wife left.  Whack off.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:02 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:00 pm

FIFY.

If it is unresponsive, I don't bother...

You're aware of this condition.

No problem.  You lose.  As usual.
 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:06 pm

I do not

Answer the question,  Runny...

This is your "case"..

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:00 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:06 pm

Keep Running Lil Timmy.

From what are you now insisting I'm running?


 

 

That is a question Lil Timmy.  Until you fulfill the requirement you have no question privileges.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:07 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:06 pm

I do not see a link to your citation.  Post the link and I will answer.  If not, do what you have done for decades since your wife left.  Whack off.
 

Answer the question,  Runny...

This is your "case"..

 

 

Try again.  Once you post the link to your citation all will become clear.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm

That is a question Lil Timmy.  

That's right.

Answer it.

Don't be vague...there might be a "follow up" question. 

You know your rule.

Cretin.

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:09 pm

Try again.  

You're not answering the question. 

Your questions were answered, honestly  correctly and in full.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:09 pm

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:08 pm

That is a question Lil Timmy.  Until you fulfill the requirement you have no question privileges.
 

That's right.

Answer it.

Don't be vague...there might be a "follow up" question. 

You know your rule.

Cretin.

 

Try again, Tampon Timmy.

Meltdown Mary is here!
 

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 4:12 pm

Try again, Tampon Timmy.

Meltdown Mary is here!

Quimmie,


You are running, again....after welshing....again.