Are you just figuring that out Retard? LMAO!Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑You're not answering the question.*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I do not see a link to your citation. Post the link and I will answer. If not, do what you have done for decades since your wife left. Whack off.
Your questions were answered, honestly correctly and in full.
Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑Quimmie,
You are running, again....after welshing....again.
Yes, I have.*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't welshed, Tampon Timmy. You have not HONESTLY answered the question. Plus, it ain't September. Read the challenge, Tampon.
Sorry Charlie.. the can was made a long time ago..Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, I have.
Post the lies in my responses.
If you can't, you lose.
Again.
You have not answered honestly. The honest answer is the Sporter Semi Auto appears on the civilian list and was NEVER military combat issue. Stop lying. Post the link to your citation Tampon. And yes, if within ArmsLength I will call you that. And you won't do ****.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑Yes, I have.*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't welshed, Tampon Timmy. You have not HONESTLY answered the question. Plus, it ain't September. Read the challenge, Tampon.
Post the lies in my responses.
If you can't, you lose.
Again.
Post the link to your citation. I have already posted the link to mine. I bet they are the same, Tampon.Post the link to your citation, Tampon.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑
You now have no reason not to answer questions.
Your rule.
what does the article to which you are referring describe "the many variations of"?
Post the lies in my responses.
*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑You have not answered honestly. The honest answer is the Sporter Semi Auto appears on the civilian list and was NEVER military combat issue. Stop lying. Post the link to your citation Tampon. And yes, if within ArmsLength I will call you that. And you won't do ****.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑Yes, I have.*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't welshed, Tampon Timmy. You have not HONESTLY answered the question. Plus, it ain't September. Read the challenge, Tampon.
Post the lies in my responses.
If you can't, you lose.
Again.
Post the link to your citation. I have already posted the link to mine. I bet they are the same, Tampon.Post » wrote:
You now have no reason not to answer questions.
Your rule.
what does the article to which you are referring describe "the many variations of"?
Try again Tampon. Once I see a link to your AR 15 citation you will have the option of me answering one of your questions.
Tiny,
Tampon, once you post the link to the citation you have been posting (which this is really about) it will be clear. You already have that link. BUT, you are a ****** and refuse to post it.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,
This is about the citation to which YOU are referring.
Idiot.
Tampon, you do not have the link to this citation?Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑And you STILL haven't answered...*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You ied.
Now, what list does the Colt Sporter appear on, military or civilian and when was it standard combat issue?
You know where to find the links to the lists.Are you talking about lists included in the article which begins as follows?Now, what list does the Colt Sporter appear on, military or civilian
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
If so, it is listed among the civilian variants of the original Colt AR-15.The Colt AR-15 was ordered by the USAF in 1962. The original was modified, so as not to be a machine gun.and when was it standard combat issue?
Acknowledge that you've been answered IN FULL, and AGAIN.
Tiny,
Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,
It's not about me...this is about the citation to which YOU refer.
Why didn't you confirm that when asked?*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. You have the link. The following citation is from the link:
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
2. I posted the link in the following post:
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
Both are to the same citation. SO man up Tampon, and stop lying. You have the link. Not only have I boxed you in with the questioning I have given you an epic curb stomping o this issue.
I'll be back tomorrow to see what your next lies are. And yes ArmsLength, I will say to your face and you won't do **** about it. Too afraid of your clients learning who you are on line.
Bye, Lil Timmy.
Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Why didn't you confirm that when asked?
(rhetorical)
How many designs?
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
Answer honestly, and we're outta here...you with another lovely door pri,e...
He's a **** idiot.