Liberal Forum

Booger StarLink Phish is a Bytch

We got purple Maiz here.. It's sweet


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGoDaYj ... OI&index=4

Sorry if you don't get it Charlie..

JohnnyYou » 21 Jun 2025, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 5:27 pm

we deal with them everyday..

That's the problem with idiots....they're emboldened and ubiquitous...

MR-7 » 21 Jun 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 3:36 pm

You eat a dick too, bitch.

You first ***

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 11:20 am

Many?

Oh, yea...

Da Common Sense...

**** idiots.

That’s another one 

BuckNaked » 21 Jun 2025, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 7:35 pm

That’s another one

A federal appeals court panel on Wednesday refused the Justice Department’s effort to put itself on the hook for an $83.3 million defamation award advice columnist E. Jean Carroll won at trial from President Trump.  It’s the latest setback for the president in his efforts to fight Carroll’s lawsuits at the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Last week, the 2nd Circuit upheld her earlier $5 million jury award. 

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... al-denied/

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 7:42 pm

A federal appeals court panel on Wednesday refused the Justice Department’s effort to put itself on the hook for an $83.3 million defamation award advice columnist E. Jean Carroll won at trial from President Trump.  It’s the latest setback for the president in his efforts to fight Carroll’s lawsuits at the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Last week, the 2nd Circuit upheld her earlier $5 million jury award. 

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... al-denied/

No that’s not one 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm

I don't need a substitute.

I'm sure he uses "the real thing"...
 

ROG62 » 22 Jun 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:37 pm

I'm sure he uses "the real thing"...

But you don't deny that you're an idiot, do you?

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 3:33 pm

But you don't deny that you're an idiot, do you?

I do deny it, tinyfeet...next...
 
 

ROG62 » 22 Jun 2025, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 6:26 pm

I do deny it, tinyfeet...next...

Rog,

This is quite alarming.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:24 pm

Rog,

This is quite alarming.

Let me guess.. You are a size 13??

Bigfoot could step on ROG and squish him like a grape and he still wouldn't have faith of the creature's existence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cs3Pvmmv0E

 
 

JohnnyYou » 23 Jun 2025, 3:27 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2025, 3:27 am

Let me guess.. You are a size 13??

Bigfoot could step on ROG and squish him like a grape and he still wouldn't have faith of the creature's existence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cs3Pvmmv0E

We can't be slowed down by a big bunch of lip
And nobody cares about your paranoid trip
You know death and the devil sure got it easy today
Souls come so cheap some people give theirs away
You've got to break out, you've got to prove you're alive
What makes you think that the weak survive
And if you don't have the stomach
For all this radical crap
Then have the guts to stand for something
Or you're gonna be trapped
Trapped
Trapped in a world that you never made

https://youtu.be/-SS3Oe7LmKQ?si=YNyCcL10H97B_2TC
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 8:01 am

Savor the flavor of Reich Wing Media idiocy..

https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1067223-pete-hegseth-silences-senator-after-she-crosses-the-line-with-outrageous-question?utm_source=alert-t-Gmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=alert-rc&utm_content=747e2c47e25e88dd883ee1a00fac3b7b#google_vignette

Pete Hegseth Silences Senator After She Crosses The Line With Outrageous Question!

According to NBC News, the hearing took a contentious turn when Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) posed a provocative question to Hegseth, seemingly aimed at portraying President Trump as authoritarian. Hirono asked, “If ordered by the President to shoot peaceful protesters in the legs, would you carry out such an order?”

This inquiry appeared to suggest that the President might endorse violence against individuals exercising their First Amendment rights....

Hegseth, unfazed by the senator's line of questioning, responded decisively, “Senator, as I have said before, of course, I reject the premise of your question. And the characterization that I would be given unlawful orders, it’s all meant to smear the commander in chief, and I won’t fall for it.” His retort effectively dismissed Hirono's insinuations, underscoring his loyalty to the President and the rule of law

Meanwhile, on Planet Earth....

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary

Former Pentagon chief Esper says Trump asked about shooting protesters
"The president was enraged," Esper recalled. "He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak and 'us' meant him. And he wanted to do something about it.

 "We reached that point in the conversation where he looked frankly at [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Gen. [Mark] Milley and said, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' ... It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air."

The point being that MAGAts and Toadies are the dumbest pieces of **** alive.

It leaks poopoo sometimes gas also 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 8:01 am

Savor the flavor of Reich Wing Media idiocy..

https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1067223-pete-hegseth-silences-senator-after-she-crosses-the-line-with-outrageous-question?utm_source=alert-t-Gmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=alert-rc&utm_content=747e2c47e25e88dd883ee1a00fac3b7b#google_vignette

Pete Hegseth Silences Senator After She Crosses The Line With Outrageous Question!

According to NBC News, the hearing took a contentious turn when Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) posed a provocative question to Hegseth, seemingly aimed at portraying President Trump as authoritarian. Hirono asked, “If ordered by the President to shoot peaceful protesters in the legs, would you carry out such an order?”

This inquiry appeared to suggest that the President might endorse violence against individuals exercising their First Amendment rights....

Hegseth, unfazed by the senator's line of questioning, responded decisively, “Senator, as I have said before, of course, I reject the premise of your question. And the characterization that I would be given unlawful orders, it’s all meant to smear the commander in chief, and I won’t fall for it.” His retort effectively dismissed Hirono's insinuations, underscoring his loyalty to the President and the rule of law

Meanwhile, on Planet Earth....

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary

Former Pentagon chief Esper says Trump asked about shooting protesters
"The president was enraged," Esper recalled. "He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak and 'us' meant him. And he wanted to do something about it.

 "We reached that point in the conversation where he looked frankly at [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Gen. [Mark] Milley and said, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' ... It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air."

The point being that MAGAts and Toadies are the dumbest pieces of **** alive.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 23 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for you



you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 
 

:rofl:  
 

Vegas » 23 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

This is killing me what’s the answer?

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 8:01 am

Savor the flavor of Reich Wing Media idiocy..

https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1067223-pete-hegseth-silences-senator-after-she-crosses-the-line-with-outrageous-question?utm_source=alert-t-Gmail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=alert-rc&utm_content=747e2c47e25e88dd883ee1a00fac3b7b#google_vignette

Pete Hegseth Silences Senator After She Crosses The Line With Outrageous Question!

According to NBC News, the hearing took a contentious turn when Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) posed a provocative question to Hegseth, seemingly aimed at portraying President Trump as authoritarian. Hirono asked, “If ordered by the President to shoot peaceful protesters in the legs, would you carry out such an order?”

This inquiry appeared to suggest that the President might endorse violence against individuals exercising their First Amendment rights....

Hegseth, unfazed by the senator's line of questioning, responded decisively, “Senator, as I have said before, of course, I reject the premise of your question. And the characterization that I would be given unlawful orders, it’s all meant to smear the commander in chief, and I won’t fall for it.” His retort effectively dismissed Hirono's insinuations, underscoring his loyalty to the President and the rule of law

Meanwhile, on Planet Earth....

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/09/10975174 ... -secretary

Former Pentagon chief Esper says Trump asked about shooting protesters
"The president was enraged," Esper recalled. "He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak and 'us' meant him. And he wanted to do something about it.

 "We reached that point in the conversation where he looked frankly at [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Gen. [Mark] Milley and said, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' ... It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air."

The point being that MAGAts and Toadies are the dumbest pieces of **** alive.

Mazie Hirono is unarguably the dumbest **** to ever hold a senate seat.
 

Cedar » 23 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2025, 1:54 pm

Mazie Hirono is unarguably the dumbest **** to ever hold a senate seat.

She sure punked Pete, and the clown in question.

You try that

Blackvegetable » 23 Jun 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2025, 12:14 pm

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors