Liberal Forum

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:21 pm

This part if pretty cool:

"If somebody were to get out, there's nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. Only alligators and pythons are waiting," he said during an interview with Fox News correspondent Danamarie McNicholl on Tuesday.

It will be an awesome place.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:28 pm

right after that $5,000 check arrives.     

^^^^MORE LIES  FROM THE ANGRY LITTLE MAN......bless his little heart      
 

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm

LMAO!

Question on the Jury Verdict Forum calls you a liar.  Making **** up?  I posted facts, Timmy.

This jury did not award Ms. Carroll more than $2 million for groping her breasts through her clothing, wrongful as that might have been. There was no evidence at all of such behavior. Instead, the proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm. Mr. Trump’s argument therefore ignores the bulk of the evidence at trial, misinterprets the jury’s verdict, and mistakenly focuses on the New York Penal Law definition of “rape” to the exclusion of the meaning of that word as it often is used in everyday life and of the evidence of what actually occurred between Ms. Carroll and Mr. Trump.

There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s sexual assault damages.

The Structure of the Verdict

Both parties submitted proposed “special verdict” forms to distribute to the jury. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, which governs jury verdict forms and questions, “[t]he court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding on each issue of fact.”40 A special verdict stands in contrast to a general verdict form, which typically asks jurors to answer only the ultimate questions of liability and the damages amounts, if any.

The Court here used a special verdict form that was substantially similar to the parties’ proposed forms, consisting of factual questions going to liability and damages, organized by the two claims. Neither party raised any objection to the Court’s verdict form nor demanded that any specific questions other than those on the special verdict form be submitted to the jury. In accordance with Rule 49, the Court “g[a]ve the instructions and explanations necessary to enable the jury to make its findings on each submitted issue” contained in the verdict form.41 Accordingly, the meaning of the jury’s answers to each question on the verdict form depends upon the instructions given as to what it had to conclude in order to answer the questions.
......

Accordingly, the jury’s negative answer to Question 1 means only that the jury was unpersuaded that Mr. Trump’s penis penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina. It does not mean that he did not forcibly insert his fingers into her – that he “raped” her in the broader sense of that word which, as discussed above, includes any penetration by any part of an accused’s body (including a finger or fingers) or any other object.67

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf



Your groveling unconditional surrender may not be enough to save you....

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 9:30 am

The US labor landscape is being roiled as high-profile workplace raids by immigration agents kitted out in military gear scare off workers who lack permission to be in the country and leave employers unsure of how they’ll manage without them. Unauthorized immigrants make up an estimated 5% of the US workforce, with the concentration particularly high in construction, food processing and other areas that face chronic labor shortages.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features ... s-cracking

 

Oh, the poor babies!!! 
How DARE those evil immigration agents frighten criminal illegals with no regard for our laws!
And I feel SO SORRY for those employers who will be wringing their hands with woe that they now have to follow the law and hire ONLY legal employees!

You are truly such an unmitigated buffoon that it's laughable!
Your **** head is so far up your *** you can probably see through your nipples!
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:46 pm

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:30 pm

LMAO!

Question on the Jury Verdict Forum calls you a liar.  Making **** up?  I posted facts, Timmy.

This jury did not award Ms. Carroll more than $2 million for groping her breasts through her clothing, wrongful as that might have been. There was no evidence at all of such behavior. Instead, the proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm. Mr. Trump’s argument therefore ignores the bulk of the evidence at trial, misinterprets the jury’s verdict, and mistakenly focuses on the New York Penal Law definition of “rape” to the exclusion of the meaning of that word as it often is used in everyday life and of the evidence of what actually occurred between Ms. Carroll and Mr. Trump.

There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s sexual assault damages.

The Structure of the Verdict

Both parties submitted proposed “special verdict” forms to distribute to the jury. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, which governs jury verdict forms and questions, “[t]he court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding on each issue of fact.”40 A special verdict stands in contrast to a general verdict form, which typically asks jurors to answer only the ultimate questions of liability and the damages amounts, if any.

The Court here used a special verdict form that was substantially similar to the parties’ proposed forms, consisting of factual questions going to liability and damages, organized by the two claims. Neither party raised any objection to the Court’s verdict form nor demanded that any specific questions other than those on the special verdict form be submitted to the jury. In accordance with Rule 49, the Court “g[a]ve the instructions and explanations necessary to enable the jury to make its findings on each submitted issue” contained in the verdict form.41 Accordingly, the meaning of the jury’s answers to each question on the verdict form depends upon the instructions given as to what it had to conclude in order to answer the questions.
......

Accordingly, the jury’s negative answer to Question 1 means only that the jury was unpersuaded that Mr. Trump’s penis penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina. It does not mean that he did not forcibly insert his fingers into her – that he “raped” her in the broader sense of that word which, as discussed above, includes any penetration by any part of an accused’s body (including a finger or fingers) or any other object.67

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf



Your groveling unconditional surrender may not be enough to save you....

 

Oh, in the broader sense of the word.  Not according to what constituted rape at the time under NY law.

Game over.  The jury was not persuaded. Thanks!  Don't bother me again about this, Lil Timmy.

Zeets2 » 20 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm

Oh, the poor babies!!! 
How DARE those evil immigration agents frighten criminal illegals with no regard for our laws!
And I feel SO SORRY for those employers who will be wringing their hands with woe that they now have to follow the law and hire ONLY legal employees!

You are truly such an unmitigated buffoon that it's laughable!
Your **** head is so far up your *** you can probably see through your nipples!

frighten criminal illegals with no regard for our laws!

you voted for a felon, you **** idiot.

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm

Oh, in the broader sense of the word.  Not according to what constituted rape at the time under NY law.

Game over.  The jury was not persuaded. Thanks!  Don't bother me again about this, Lil Timmy.

Why did the jury award 2 million dollars?

MR-7 » 20 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:42 pm

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:21 pm

This part if pretty cool:

"If somebody were to get out, there's nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. Only alligators and pythons are waiting," he said during an interview with Fox News correspondent Danamarie McNicholl on Tuesday.

It will be an awesome place.
 

 

From another report about this:

"You don't need to invest that much in the perimeter. People get out, there's not that much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons," Uthmeier said in a video posted on X. "Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide."

https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/flo ... s/3641349/

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:52 pm

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm

Oh, in the broader sense of the word.  Not according to what constituted rape at the time under NY law.

Game over.  The jury was not persuaded. Thanks!  Don't bother me again about this, Lil Timmy.

Why did the jury award 2 million dollars?

 

   Stop bugging about this **** unless you are bringing a case with information.  Not doing your work, Lil Timmy.

Hey, what do you think about Alligator Alcatraz?

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:53 pm

   Stop bugging about this **** unless you are bringing a case with information.  Not doing your work, Lil Timmy.

Hey, what do you think about Alligator Alcatraz?

Tiny,

You are, and have been, completely wrong.

Because you're a moron.

Always answer my questions the first time.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm

^^^^MORE LIES  FROM THE ANGRY LITTLE MAN......bless his little heart    

Bitch at Elon.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:06 pm

Tiny,

You are, and have been, completely wrong.

Because you're a moron.

Always answer my questions the first time.

Lil Timmy, the Jury Verdict Forum says you are wrong..  Lil Timmy, stop bugging me about the ****.  Remember, the judge. did not use the legal definition of rape.  He used the broader definition.  So, with that said the Jury never found him liable or guilty of rape.

And every time you lie I will point that out.

Lil Timmy, you did not say what you thought about Alligator Alcatraz.

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm

Lil Timmy, the Jury Verdict Forum says you are wrong..  

No....it does not...as demonstrated and repeatedly upheld.

I have disputed objective fact.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:15 pm

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm

Lil Timmy, the Jury Verdict Forum says you are wrong..  

No....it does not...as demonstrated and repeatedly upheld.

I have disputed objective fact.

Whom do those words belong to, Lil Timmy?

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 2:27 pm

Post the thread title, brick.

LOL - I did!  Then, I posted a bunch of Illegal Aliens swarming our nation because Biden and you Democrats with your sanctuary cities didn't do **** to stop them!!!
 

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm

Lil Timmy, the Jury Verdict Forum says you are wrong..  Lil Timmy, stop bugging me about the ****.  Remember, the judge. did not use the legal definition of rape.  He used the broader definition.  So, with that said the Jury never found him liable or guilty of rape.

And every time you lie I will point that out.

Lil Timmy, you did not say what you thought about Alligator Alcatraz.

He used the broader definition.

So, with that said the Jury never found him liable or guilty of rape.

I bet you record The Five...

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:18 pm

*Huey » 20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:11 pm

Lil Timmy, the Jury Verdict Forum says you are wrong..  Lil Timmy, stop bugging me about the ****.  Remember, the judge. did not use the legal definition of rape.  He used the broader definition.  So, with that said the Jury never found him liable or guilty of rape.

And every time you lie I will point that out.

Lil Timmy, you did not say what you thought about Alligator Alcatraz.

He used the broader definition.

So, with that said the Jury never found him liable or guilty of rape.

I bet you record The Five...

 

You wouldn't be allowed to make that bet.  You already know.  Typical from you.  Not risking a thing.  Plus, there is nothing wrong with recording The Five.  Not like I am using The Shower Cap Blog, The Tick or Blabber.Buzz.  It aint the first time you used the last one.  What a **** hoot.

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 9:30 am

The US labor landscape is being roiled as high-profile workplace raids by immigration agents kitted out in military gear scare off workers who lack permission to be in the country and leave employers unsure of how they’ll manage without them. Unauthorized immigrants make up an estimated 5% of the US workforce, with the concentration particularly high in construction, food processing and other areas that face chronic labor shortages.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features ... s-cracking

.....and they vote for a rapist felon.

So **** g'ddammned stupid.

The Dairy Queer Dickhead is still clutching his pearls over his Trump Derangement Syndrome


 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 9:30 am

The US labor landscape is being roiled as high-profile workplace raids by immigration agents kitted out in military gear scare off workers who lack permission to be in the country and leave employers unsure of how they’ll manage without them. Unauthorized immigrants make up an estimated 5% of the US workforce, with the concentration particularly high in construction, food processing and other areas that face chronic labor shortages.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features ... s-cracking



.....and they vote for a rapist felon.



So **** g'ddammned stupid. 

 

Sounds like you are for illegals working for slave wages.  

So **** g'ddammned stupid.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jun 2025, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jun 2025, 3:08 pm

Bitch at Elon.

^^^^MORE LIES  FROM THE ANGRY LITTLE MAN......bless his little heart