Liberal Forum

"I'm not playing your question game!"


https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/193 ... 09888?s=19
 

Maybe Mike is another victim of August, 2017....
A day that will live in infamy....

I don’t notice anything

This Mike Lee

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mike-lee- ... exts-show/

Texts sent from high-ranking Republican lawmakers between the 2020 election and the attack on the U.S. Capital on Jan. 6 show the level of desperation some felt as misinformation about a nonexistent “rigged election” spiraled out of control. A series of texts from Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) to Mark Meadows, who was White House chief of staff at that time, show how those who vowed to push forward Donald Trump’s lies about the election struggled for substance. The texts, first reported by CNN, were part of a cache of documents obtained by the House Jan. 6 investigators. Among them are a slew of missives sent to Meadows. In one, written on Nov. 7, Lee offered to Meadows “unequivocal support for you to exhaust every legal and constitutional remedy at your disposal to restore Americans faith in our elections.” But he later wrote a more desperate plea. “Just give me something to work with,” Lee wrote. “Please tell me what I should be saying.”


 On the same day, Roy went a step further about just what they needed to prove the unprovable lie. “We need ammo. We need fraud examples. We need it this weekend,” he wrote. On Jan. 1, Roy wrote, “We’re driving a stake in the heart of the federal republic.” The extent of Roy’s support had not been previously known, according to CNN.

 
 

You keep clinging to that

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 6:24 am

"I'm not playing your question game!"


https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/193 ... 09888?s=19
 

Maybe Mike is another victim of August, 2017....
A day that will live in infamy....

 

What was your original source for that?  I know you don't follow right wing nobodies.

The only victim of Aug 2017 is you.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 6:24 am

"I'm not playing your question game!"

https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/193 ... 09888?s=19

Maybe Mike is another victim of August, 2017....
A day that will live in infamy....

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Vegas » 21 Jun 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 11:36 am

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

3 do not fit my definition. 


 

Red hat blind folds

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 2:25 pm

3 do not fit my definition.

which 3?

BuckNaked » 21 Jun 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 11:14 am

You keep clinging to that

What do you mean "that"?

*Huey » 21 Jun 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 11:32 am

What was your original source for that?  I know you don't follow right wing nobodies.

The only victim of Aug 2017 is you.

The only victim of Aug 2017 is you

:die:  

What was your original source for that? 

I bet Mike Lee’s mom is proud of him tonight. Aced the WWJD standard. Aced that ****. I don’t think I could handle disappointing Tina Smith that badly. It’s nice to see Mike Lee slink away in shame, because Mike Lee is a fellow who should slink away in shame a lot more often. This was not Mike Lee’s first shameful act.

https://showercapblog.com/how-hard-can-war-be-really/


Are you gonna make a case this time, or skeedaddle.....again?

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 7:34 am

What do you mean "that"?

Jan 6th

BuckNaked » 22 Jun 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 12:19 pm

Jan 6th

It's now a "that".

**** cretins.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2025, 2:25 pm

3 do not fit my definition.

Whatever. Answer, coward. 




Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Vegas » 22 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 1:52 pm

Whatever. Answer, coward. 


 

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image   I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him.  @Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down. 


This is way overdue.

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 1:59 pm

 

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 22 Jun 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 1:59 pm

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for you

To give some backstory here, I was exposing Veghead's stupid article about his usual presidential rankings. He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. Image  

I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 

@Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down. 

This is way overdue

 I agree.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:02 pm

 

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2025, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 1:41 pm

It's now a "that".

**** cretins.

lol hit a nerve?

BuckNaked » 22 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2025, 2:57 pm

lol hit a nerve?

That's not hitting a nerve..

Watch.

Who won the 2020 election?