Liberal Forum

*Huey » 24 Jun 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 7:40 am

You should have read the thread first.  Look at his last post

What is your "case", Stalky?


 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 7:42 am

What is your "case", Stalky?

 

• LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
• Trump: 'All planes will turn around and head home'

WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL, June 24 (Reuters) - Iranian and Israeli media reported new Israeli airstrikes on Iran on Tuesday, despite U.S. President Donald Trump having said Israel had called them off at his command to preserve an hours-old ceasefire.
Two explosions were heard in the capital, the judiciary news outlet Mizan reported. Israeli army radio said Israel had struck an Iranian radar site near Tehran.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 7:42 am

What is your "case", Stalky?


 

 

Read his last post and it will become perfectly clear.  In your efforts to play gotcha he has already posted about Trump lashing out at Israel and Iran.  

*Huey » 24 Jun 2025, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 7:52 am

Read his last post and it will become perfectly clear.  In your efforts to play gotcha he has already posted about Trump lashing out at Israel and Iran.

No, Tiny

Post your "case" and take a stand.

Your rule.
 

Mrkelly » 24 Jun 2025, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 7:51 am

• LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
• Trump: 'All planes will turn around and head home'

WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL, June 24 (Reuters) - Iranian and Israeli media reported new Israeli airstrikes on Iran on Tuesday, despite U.S. President Donald Trump having said Israel had called them off at his command to preserve an hours-old ceasefire.
Two explosions were heard in the capital, the judiciary news outlet Mizan reported. Israeli army radio said Israel had struck an Iranian radar site near Tehran.

viewtopic.php?p=2760601#p2760601

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:09 am

viewtopic.php?p=2760601#p2760601

Who wudda thought that Bibi and Putin don’t give a damn about what tRump says

tRump “truthed” this right before the attack 


“ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly “Plane Wave” to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES“

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 7:40 am

I guess you're sucking it...

I ain’t suckin nuttin nappyhead 

BuckNaked » 24 Jun 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:14 am

I ain’t suckin nuttin nappyhead

If you want that blanket, you better pucker up..


https://youtu.be/LkCozyyVtgw?si=69fWUlbDqe79fAq5

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:06 am

No, Tiny

Post your "case" and take a stand.

Your rule.
 

 

I did.

1.  You failed to read the entire thread before your failed gotcha attempt.

2.  He had already posted about before you did.

3.  As I have stated in the past you do not read threads or posts before making an *** of yourself.  


 

*Huey » 24 Jun 2025, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:24 am

I did.

1.  You failed to read the entire thread before your failed gotcha attempt.

2.  He had already posted about before you did.

3.  As I have stated in the past you do not read threads or posts before making an *** of yourself.

that's not a case, cretin

That's a recitation of events.

Is your argument that buck is NOT as credulous an imbecile as you are?
 

Mrkelly » 24 Jun 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:12 am

Who wudda thought that Bibi and Putin don’t give a damn about what tRump says

tRump “truthed” this right before the attack 

“ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly “Plane Wave” to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES“

He's a prop, occasionally a foil, in this production. 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:27 am

that's not a case, cretin

That's a recitation of events.

Is your argument that buck is NOT as credulous an imbecile as you are?
 

 

LMAO!

*Huey » 24 Jun 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:43 am

LMAO!

Run.

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 8:23 am

If you want that blanket, you better pucker up..

https://youtu.be/LkCozyyVtgw?si=69fWUlbDqe79fAq5

what blanket it’s hot as hell 

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 5:43 am

Learn to write, Dumb ****

Coming from the moron who rarely reads and can't write anything intelligent of his own. ^^^

Vegas » 24 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm

Coming from the moron who rarely reads and can't write anything intelligent of his own. ^^^

Let's see a definition of Survivorship bias in YOUR words...

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 12:45 pm

Let's see a definition of Survivorship bias in YOUR words...

             Another desperate attempt at stalling. 

This is the only thing that will stop this.

Option A: Answer it with a defense as to why you chose your answer. This eliminates guesswork
Option B: Finally admit that you have no **** idea what Survivorship Bias is. 


Watch this:
1. Continue to stall with more questions/demands. Then blame me for not answering while you continue to not answer. 

Vegas » 24 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm

             

I agree...

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 12:53 pm

I agree...

And again, you prove my point. You don't read anything. QED.

Have it your way. Let's continue then. 



Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 24 Jun 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 12:55 pm

And again, you prove my point. You don't read anything. QED.

Have it your way. Let's continue then. 

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or


 

Have a native speaker help you with this...

Get back to me...