RebelGator » 25 Jun 2025, 6:05 am » wrote: ↑ He believes you're a gay moron, probably a British one at that.....Tunic Boy.
You don't know what I qualify to participate in. Also, who said anything about "participate"?Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2025, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't qualify to participate in private offerings.
I know how to value a business. ^^^^ Depends on the business. You obviously are not talking about small businesses, or franchise businesses.I also did private valuation. It uses discounted public market comparable multiples.
You could say that about almost everything, including whores and pastors.equities are cheap or expensive only in a relative sense...
I read your stuff.Skans » 25 Jun 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ You don't know what I qualify to participate in. Also, who said anything about "participate"?
I know how to value a business. ^^^^ Depends on the business. You obviously are not talking about small businesses, or franchise businesses.
You could say that about almost everything, including whores and pastors.
LOL - "get an advisor". LMFAO!!!Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ I read your stuff.
Get an advisor.
Confirm his/her credentials (no insurance agents).
Ask them to define 'risk".
Get back to me with their responses.
You could ask 100 people who the people are in this photo and not 1 person would say that is Donald Trump......
$50K back in the 1990s is like $135K todayFuelman » 24 Jun 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Tried that a couple of decades ago, lost $50k.
Today we gladly pay our advisor $8k or so a year.
Why do you believe your desperation matters?*GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Jun 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ You could ask 100 people who the people are in this photo and not 1 person would say that is Donald Trump......
Only TDS stricken BV "sees: Trump.
Don't go into autorant.Skans » 25 Jun 2025, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ LOL - "get an advisor". LMFAO!!!
Advisor: "Now, the first thing we need to do is assess your level of risk tolerance. The more risk you take, the more wealth you will potentially make in the long run. How do you feel about your account losing 20% of its value overnight?"
Skans: It makes me feel like if you aren't actively using this to give it a 50% upside in the next 5 days, YOU'RE FIRED!"
The only desperate person here is you.
Ghetto,*GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Jun 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ The only desperate person here is you.
At this point you might as well "let it all hang out" with the "Gay Trump" and "Trump Raped Carroll" ridiculousness because your reputation can't possibly sink any lower.
Honestly, the only thing I want to hear from an investment advisor on "risk" is this:Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ Don't go into autorant.
Read it again.
Ask them to define 'risk".
Not one single MSM network would touch your "gay Trump" photo with a ten foot pole...Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ Ghetto,
It's attributed.
Grifty has a person specifically tasked with scouring the internet for mentions.
He hasn't even requested a retraction.
There is no controversy..
It's Sweet, Sweet Donnie with his groomer.
Conde Nast has plenty to lose, GhettoImbecile.
Skans,Skans » 25 Jun 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Honestly, the only thing I want to hear from an investment advisor on "risk" is this:
I only work with experienced investors. I expect that you understand what risk is and accept that what I do has more inherent risk than someone pitching the benefits of a balanced portfolio. I expect you to already have other investments or sources of income to survive on, and that's not why you're hiring me. In any given 24 month period of time, I should be increasing the value of your overall investment with me by over 25%. That's what you're paying me for.
....only because your prized photo is not Trump and would be a slam dunk slander case to prosecute
No...not always...
Why doesn't the very sensitive and litigious Grifty not do so?*GHETTOBLASTER » 25 Jun 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ ....only because your prized photo is not Trump and would be a slam dunk slander case to prosecute![]()
You miss the point entirely. I have heard countless advisors give their obligatory, learned-it-from-their-liability-lawyers, speech on risk. What I want to know is what can they do that any other advisor who has access to Morgan Stanley, Chase, Wells, Ameriprise, Merrill, or some other Quack-In-The-Box back-office "team" can't do? That's what people really want to know, right?Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ No...not always...
If your prospective advisor can't provide 3 coherent definitions, and speak intelligently about them, then change the subject to crafts.
You miss mine.Skans » 25 Jun 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ You miss the point entirely. I have heard countless advisors give their obligatory, learned-it-from-their-liability-lawyers, speech on risk.