It's sunday morning, I suppose I could point out what you still are but it's hard to find the energy..murdock » 29 Jun 2025, 3:53 am » wrote: ↑ Hey janet, you are STILL a stupid mother ****. Corporal dick sucker!
You're a **** imbecile. An 80 IQ **** idiot. Always will be.Jantje_Smit » 29 Jun 2025, 4:04 am » wrote: ↑ It's sunday morning, I suppose I could point out what you still are but it's hard to find the energy..
![]()
https://i.postimg.cc/h4J89NB7/south-park-motorcycle.gif
:Live long knowing there are persons alive that completely understand how evolving actually happens from experiencing living eternally separated by each heartbeat added so far. Your New World Order has completely corrupted too many ancestral lineages so far.
Die you **** spewing cocksucker.31stArrival » 29 Jun 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ :Live long knowing there are persons alive that completely understand how evolving actually happens from experiencing living eternally separated by each heartbeat added so far. Your New World Order has completely corrupted too many ancestral lineages so far.
Every artificial reality is imploding now. Context and reasonable doubt(hope, faith, charity, promised 365.2422 tomorrows every next rotation living here since personally conceived by previous generation gaps of parenting people your direct ancestry so far won't protect your soul time denying what you been since conceived anymore.
As usual I looked it up before posting it as fact........Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 2:05 am » wrote: ↑ Is that a fact.
A "military strike" ya say? Can Trump nuke Russia? Is that not a "military strike"? Would that not be the executive starting a war without congressional approval?
What about China? Can Trump bomb Beijing? If not, why not? I'm a bit behind on my own civics. Educate me, please. Where do Trump's legitimate "military strike" authorities begin and end? We're not talking about sending an excursion after some stateless pirates or a band of border jumping rustlers, here. We're talking about BOMBING A COUNTRY, which is a formal act of war. Can you point me to the particular Amendment that changed the Constitution's clear language on who has war making authority?
Here's another thingamabob: The UN Charter is a treaty. It is the foundational treaty of the United Nations, establishing the organization's structure, principles, and goals. It was signed on June 26, 1945, and came into force on October 24, 1945. It is binding on all UN member states, as joining the UN requires signing the treaty. The United States are obligated by that treaty. As such, the UN Charter's prohibitions and agreements are LAW OF THE LAND. Would you like to see what it says about bombing folks? It prohibits even the mere THREAT of force against any state's territorial integrity or political independence, except in specific situations like self-defense or when authorized by the UN Security Council. Neither case existed in any hetersexual sense when trump acted as israel's little bitch against iran.
The US is also signatory to the Hague Conventions, which require that hostilities should not begin without prior warning, either through a declaration of war or an ultimatum - no cowardly sneak attacks on countries. Iran was told they had two weeks and then was hit with a surprise attack by a president who acted unilaterally, without congressional approval, in violation of the Hague Conventions and other treaties which form the basis of the "rules based order" (international law) that US politicians like to run their mouths about.
Trump's actions were lawless on many, many levels. AOC is like that broken clock. That is, she's right. But her party is as neocon as the *** repuke party, and it will never dare punish trump for following their master's orders.
Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 1:45 am » wrote: ↑ What - you haven't jacked to that? I mean, it was grudge sex. But, yeah. Of course I jacked to that. I assumed that you did, too.
Oh, wait. That's right. You jack to Bibi Nutsinyouboo. You're a big *** for jew cock. Why would a guy like you cast a lustful eye on a hot portarican hor?
For the record, I jacked to that low IQ alaskan governor MILF, too. The one with the retarded kid - can't remember her name. The pageant queen type - ran for vp with a george bush doppelganger whose name I also forget.
That was grudge sex, too. Stupid broads only excite me if I'm being mean to them.
You know very well these doom azzes can't get past your first sentence.Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 2:05 am » wrote: ↑ Is that a fact.
A "military strike" ya say? Can Trump nuke Russia? Is that not a "military strike"? Would that not be the executive starting a war without congressional approval?
What about China? Can Trump bomb Beijing? If not, why not? I'm a bit behind on my own civics. Educate me, please. Where do Trump's legitimate "military strike" authorities begin and end? We're not talking about sending an excursion after some stateless pirates or a band of border jumping rustlers, here. We're talking about BOMBING A COUNTRY, which is a formal act of war. Can you point me to the particular Amendment that changed the Constitution's clear language on who has war making authority?
Here's a civics thingamabob that I've read about: All treaties to which the US is signatory are law of the land, co-equal with our Constitution. Did you know that one?
Here's another thingamabob: The UN Charter is a treaty. It is the foundational treaty of the United Nations, establishing the organization's structure, principles, and goals. It was signed on June 26, 1945, and came into force on October 24, 1945. It is binding on all UN member states, as joining the UN requires signing the treaty. The United States are obligated by that treaty. As such, the UN Charter's prohibitions and agreements are LAW OF THE LAND. Would you like to see what it says about bombing folks? It prohibits even the mere THREAT of force against any state's territorial integrity or political independence, except in specific situations like self-defense or when authorized by the UN Security Council. Neither case existed in any hetersexual sense when trump acted as israel's little bitch against iran.
The US is also signatory to the Hague Conventions, which require that hostilities should not begin without prior warning, either through a declaration of war or an ultimatum - no cowardly sneak attacks on countries. Iran was told they had two weeks and then was hit with a surprise attack by a president who acted unilaterally, without congressional approval, in violation of the Hague Conventions and other treaties which form the basis of the "rules based order" (international law) that US politicians like to run their mouths about.
Trump's actions were lawless on many, many levels. AOC is like that broken clock. That is, she's right. But her party is as neocon as the *** repuke party, and it will never dare punish trump for following their master's orders.
Punch » 24 Jun 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑
I know a few bleeding hearts that side with AOC. (I'm not naming names, but Cannonpointer is one of them)
Donald Trump issues warning to AOC after impeachment push
(Full article at above link)
U.S. President Donald Trump challenged Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to try impeaching him, and said the democratic socialist should be more focused on keeping hold of her seat instead. Ocasio-Cortez, also known as AOC, had said Trump's ordering of strikes on Iran without congressional approval was grounds for impeachment. "She better start worrying about her own Primary, before she thinks about beating our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, whose career is definitely on very thin ice!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "She and her Democrat friends have just hit the Lowest Poll Numbers in Congressional History, so go ahead and try Impeaching me, again, MAKE MY DAY!"
AOC fired back at Trump on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday afternoon saying, "Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me - I'm just a silly girl. Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war. It only took you 5 months to break almost every promise you made."
On Saturday, the president announced strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in response to the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, a U.S. ally. On June 13, Israel struck Tehran, Iran's capital, and other cities to disrupt its nuclear capabilities, and Iran retaliated with strikes of its own, the majority of which were intercepted by Israeli defense systems.
Over the past 24 hours, the U.S. brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was announced by President Trump, following a 12-day conflict marked by U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and Iranian missile attacks on Israel and a U.S. base in Qatar. Despite the ceasefire, both nations have accused each other of violations, with continued missile exchanges and airstrikes casting doubt on the truce's stability.
I know a few bleeding hearts that side with AOC
You mind is always on the fence between personal chromosomes eternally separated in plain sight and syllables of social consensus suggesting that isn't possible every day alive..
Yeah, that was good stuff. Gotta love a hot ditz.Jantje_Smit » 29 Jun 2025, 3:23 am » wrote: ↑ That would be Sarah Palin.. damn, that brings memories, at the time I was still siding with the liberals, thinking they were the good guys.. I know.. lol.. we had some fun with that one, I thought it wouldn't be possible to find a a more clueless VP candidate.. I was so wrong about that, oh boy..
![]()
Your link leads to deep state *** and horse ****. I saw none of my points being "summarily dismissed." I saw all of them being ducked... ^*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ As usual I looked it up before posting it as fact........
.https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/doe ... ns-in-iran
https://robertcliftonrobinson.com/2025/ ... -approval/
One such action by a past President was given the name "Operation Just Cause" ....![]()
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law- ... val/IranOn June 21, 2025, the U.S. military attacked three nuclear sites in Iran. Congress did not approve the action and has not declared war. Iran hadn't attacked any U.S. targets, but the Trump administration claimed that Iran's nuclear program meant that attacks were imminent.The administration could try to frame any retaliatory strikes by Iran as justification to proceed without Congressional approval under the War Powers Act, at least for a limited time.Congress could pass legislation limiting the president's war powers, but would need to gather enough support to override an almost certain veto from Trump. Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie submitted such a resolution in the House on June 17.
I have no doubt the legality of the air strike was looked at closely by people who know the law backwards and forward before it was allowed to take place.
All the points you just raised were considered and summarily dismissed........
Oh, I have little doubt she could lay me up for sure. She could **** me into the ground and then do a fancy pageant walk on top of me - in heels. And I would hold every wound in high esteem.roadkill » 29 Jun 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ She out performed Obama on the campaign trail. I heard you wound up in a wheel chair after you two met.
It's ok...I understand now that yer old lady left you to hate ducks instead...Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I have little doubt she could lay me up for sure. She could **** me into the ground and then do a fancy pageant walk on top of me - in heels. And I would hold every wound in high esteem.
But alas, my only scrapes and scars were from my own palm.
I am quite sure that the points you made were considered by the legal experts and dismissed.Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ Your link leads to deep state *** and horse ****. I saw none of my points being "summarily dismissed." I saw all of them being ducked... ^
I'll just take your word we can take their word.*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ I am quite sure that the points you made were considered by the legal experts and dismissed.
This is precisely why I have always trusted the experts. They know what's going on - we don't.*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ The decision makers also have the advantage of being privy to the latest intel that neither you or me or the Associated Press have.,,
Oh, I couldn't agree more. The republicans were trying to hamstring Biden - he should have been free to do what he saw fit, based on what his epxerts were advising.*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ The president needs a way to bypass Congress if he thinks that we need to take immediate action no matter how many treaties are in place.
Wait. Iran was about to send missiles flying at us?*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Argue all you want about how you think this emergency system is being abused but the fact remains that The President in every instance gets to make an opinion based decision to act preemptively instead of being forced to wait until he sees enemy missiles flying at us.

You should know, you allowed your natural brain to be limited to believe your time alive isn't self evident that you never existed equally alive since conception.murdock » 29 Jun 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ Why do people insist on believing everything the proven liars in the media say? Day in day out, swallowing it whole...smh.
They were too closeCannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ I'll just take your word we can take their word.
Where do they stand on israel, these experts of yours?
This is precisely why I have always trusted the experts. They know what's going on - we don't.
Thanks for reminding me.
Oh, I couldn't agree more. The republicans were trying to hamstring Biden - he should have been free to do what he saw fit, based on what his epxerts were advising.
Wait. Iran was about to send missiles flying at us?
Were they two weeks out from a nuke? Is that your position?
31stArrival » 29 Jun 2025, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You should know, you allowed your natural brain to be limited to believe your time alive isn't self evident that you never existed equally alive since conception.
Humanity always does, you never will. The irony here is you screw yourself siding with humanity's governance of artificial tomorrows 7 rotations of the planet 365.2422 every year without a calendar being your intellectual guide every heartbeat forward.