Liberal Forum

31stArrival » 29 Jun 2025, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 7:59 pm

Humanity always does, you never will. The irony here is you screw yourself siding with humanity's governance of artificial tomorrows 7 rotations of the planet 365.2422 every year without a calendar being your intellectual guide every heartbeat forward.

Remember humanity is the collective ideologies within this species, not this species as genetically alive.

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:05 am

I'll just take your word we can take their word.

Where do they stand on israel, these experts of yours?

This is precisely why I have always trusted the experts. They know what's going on - we don't.

Thanks for reminding me.

Oh, I couldn't agree more. The republicans were trying to hamstring Biden - he should have been free to do what he saw fit, based on what his epxerts were advising.

Wait. Iran was about to send missiles flying at us?

Were they two weeks out from a nuke? Is that your position?

1. He can order U.S. forces into military action if, in his judgment, the safety or strategic interests of the United States are threatened.  Period.
2. He must inform Congress of these actions within 48 hours of the event.
3. The troops cannot be committed for more than 60 days, without Congressional approval.  He may use an additional 30 days to re-deploy the troops.
4. Until a new Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) is passed by Congress, our last three presidents have all used the AUMF passed after 9/11/2001 as broad permission to fight all terror groups and acts of terror, anywhere in the world.  This is the justification for the thousands of troops presently deployed to Iraq and Syria, and for other Special Operations missions in places like Somalia and Yemen."

roadkill » 29 Jun 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:46 am

It's ok...I understand now that yer old lady left you to hate ducks instead...      

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOtdR0nvumk

murdock » 29 Jun 2025, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 8:25 pm

**** you and your whole babbling piece of **** family!
 

31stArrival » 30 Jun 2025, 5:03 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:03 am

Did you know every reality is Actual Time(at) being alive governed by Intellectual Tyranny(it) by leaderships educating each brain navigating from their personal location living here now to believe no Intellectual Soul(is) can understand Chromosome Reproductions' Actual Position(crap) about adapting in plain sight?

I witness the results in every post you place.

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 1:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:44 am

You're either joking, or you're on dope.

Okay, I take it back. I agree with AOC. She IS a silly girl. And trump is a traitor who violated the Constitution for his lover and who lied to his voters (most of whom are queer and don't mind. Homosexuals live a lie anyway).

The fat orange queer started a war - illegally. Whatever does or does not flow from that - and it is WAY too **** early for anyone to be making claims, - he remains a criminal, a liar, and a stooge for a foreign country. Those who support his treason remain gay and socialist, America-second stooges.

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 1:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:44 am

You're either joking, or you're on dope.

I certainly agree that his actions are grounds for impeachment, Constitutionally. Our founders never envisioned a gay president, much less one who presumes to unilaterally start wars for the guy whose dick he sucks. That is why they gave the LEGISLATURE - NOT THE EXECUTIVE - the power to make war. Trump purloined that power.

But we're a long way down a dirty, **** road that most of you neocon *** have paved with the turds that israel has scraped off their dick from your cock-greedy bungs. Trump is just the most recent in a long line of presidents to presume to start wars without congressional approval - or to massage that "approval" through criminal fraud.

Okay, I take it back. I agree with AOC. She IS a silly girl. And trump is a traitor who violated the Constitution for his lover and who lied to his voters (most of whom are queer and don't mind. Homosexuals live a lie anyway).

The fat orange queer started a war - illegally. Whatever does or does not flow from that - and it is WAY too **** early for anyone to be making claims, - he remains a criminal, a liar, and a stooge for a foreign country. Those who support his treason remain gay and socialist, America-second stooges.

Punch » 30 Jun 2025, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:53 am

"I agree with AOC." quote from Cannonpointer. He sucks her socialist dick. You heard it here first.

murdock » 30 Jun 2025, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:47 am

You are the MOST **** spewing piece of **** in the world. Please, catch fire you miserable cock sucker.

murdock » 30 Jun 2025, 12:55 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 12:55 am

Democrats need to be separated and locked away. The child molesting **** idiots are dangerous...however in a free country...duck duck go!

Punch » 24 Jun 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2025, 4:15 pm

I know a few bleeding hearts that side with AOC. (I'm not naming names, but Cannonpointer is one of them)

Donald Trump issues warning to AOC after impeachment push
(Full article at above link)

U.S. President Donald Trump challenged Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to try impeaching him, and said the democratic socialist should be more focused on keeping hold of her seat instead. Ocasio-Cortez, also known as AOC, had said Trump's ordering of strikes on Iran without congressional approval was grounds for impeachment. "She better start worrying about her own Primary, before she thinks about beating our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, whose career is definitely on very thin ice!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "She and her Democrat friends have just hit the Lowest Poll Numbers in Congressional History, so go ahead and try Impeaching me, again, MAKE MY DAY!"
AOC fired back at Trump on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday afternoon saying, "Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me - I'm just a silly girl. Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war. It only took you 5 months to break almost every promise you made."
On Saturday, the president announced strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in response to the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, a U.S. ally. On June 13, Israel struck Tehran, Iran's capital, and other cities to disrupt its nuclear capabilities, and Iran retaliated with strikes of its own, the majority of which were intercepted by Israeli defense systems.
Over the past 24 hours, the U.S. brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was announced by President Trump, following a 12-day conflict marked by U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and Iranian missile attacks on Israel and a U.S. base in Qatar. Despite the ceasefire, both nations have accused each other of violations, with continued missile exchanges and airstrikes casting doubt on the truce's stability.

Buck Naked » 30 Jun 2025, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 8:57 am

Is she pregnant?   Her *** is huge what happened 

murdock » 29 Jun 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:29 am

Why do people insist on believing everything the proven liars in the media say? Day in day out, swallowing it whole...smh.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 30 Jun 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:15 am

That's a good point murdock. We are reminded of that every day with the liberal fake news. I was also mindful of your mom with your posting "swallowing it hole", and would like to ask, how is she?

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 1:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:44 am

You're either joking, or you're on dope.

I certainly agree that his actions are grounds for impeachment, Constitutionally. Our founders never envisioned a gay president, much less one who presumes to unilaterally start wars for the guy whose dick he sucks. That is why they gave the LEGISLATURE - NOT THE EXECUTIVE - the power to make war. Trump purloined that power.

But we're a long way down a dirty, **** road that most of you neocon *** have paved with the turds that israel has scraped off their dick from your cock-greedy bungs. Trump is just the most recent in a long line of presidents to presume to start wars without congressional approval - or to massage that "approval" through criminal fraud.

Okay, I take it back. I agree with AOC. She IS a silly girl. And trump is a traitor who violated the Constitution for his lover and who lied to his voters (most of whom are queer and don't mind. Homosexuals live a lie anyway).

The fat orange queer started a war - illegally. Whatever does or does not flow from that - and it is WAY too **** early for anyone to be making claims, - he remains a criminal, a liar, and a stooge for a foreign country. Those who support his treason remain gay and socialist, America-second stooges.

Zeets2 » 30 Jun 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 12:43 pm

Once again, you've proven you don't know **** about the law, what constitutes fraud, what it takes to qualify as treason, or what a president is legally allowed to do under the War Powers Act, even after it's been explained to you by Roadkill, which saved me the time to rub your dumb nose in your ignorance once again.  And isn't it funny that you don't even recognize what a hypocritical cretin you are after never uttering a peep about when your gay hero Obama committed an act of war by giving guns to Mexican drug lords in Operation Fast and Furious or in dropping tens of thousands of bombs on Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Iraq, ALL without notification of Congress, just as Biden did by ordering military strikes against the Houthis in Yemen?

Do the country a favor, asshole, and don't vote in the future if you're too dumb to understand how clearly Trump made it that he would stop Iran from getting nukes and NOTHING WAS OFF THE TABLE including military strikes which he stated numerous times throughout his campaign.  Trump DID NOT violate the Constitution, nor did he lie to his voters.  The only reason you objected to HIS military strikes is because they were done in conjunction with Israel's attacks on Iran, and that's something a Jew-hater like you simply can't abide by.

You're better off spending your time stealing greenies from members here instead of providing more proof that you know nothing about the legal powers of the president you voted for.  At least you can show what a successful thief you are rather than continually exposing the depth of your ignorance!

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 2:05 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 2:05 am

Is that a fact.

A "military strike" ya say? Can Trump nuke Russia? Is that not a "military strike"? Would that not be the executive starting a war without congressional approval?

What about China? Can Trump bomb Beijing? If not, why not? I'm a bit behind on my own civics. Educate me, please. Where do Trump's legitimate "military strike" authorities begin and end? We're not talking about sending an excursion after some stateless pirates or a band of border jumping rustlers, here. We're talking about BOMBING A COUNTRY, which is a formal act of war. Can you point me to the particular Amendment that changed the Constitution's clear language on who has war making authority?

Here's a civics thingamabob that I've read about: All treaties to which the US is signatory are law of the land, co-equal with our Constitution. Did you know that one?

Here's another thingamabob: The UN Charter is a treaty. It is the foundational treaty of the United Nations, establishing the organization's structure, principles, and goals. It was signed on June 26, 1945, and came into force on October 24, 1945. It is binding on all UN member states, as joining the UN requires signing the treaty. The United States are obligated by that treaty. As such, the UN Charter's prohibitions and agreements are LAW OF THE LAND. Would you like to see what it says about bombing folks? It prohibits even the mere THREAT of force against any state's territorial integrity or political independence, except in specific situations like self-defense or when authorized by the UN Security Council. Neither case existed in any hetersexual sense when trump acted as israel's little bitch against iran.

The US is also signatory to the Hague Conventions, which require that hostilities should not begin without prior warning, either through a declaration of war or an ultimatum - no cowardly sneak attacks on countries. Iran was told they had two weeks and then was hit with a surprise attack by a president who acted unilaterally, without congressional approval, in violation of the Hague Conventions and other treaties which form the basis of the "rules based order" (international law) that US politicians like to run their mouths about. 

Trump's actions were lawless on many, many levels. AOC is like that broken clock. That is, she's right. But her party is as neocon as the *** repuke party, and it will never dare punish trump for following their master's orders.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 10:39 am

Your link leads to deep state *** and horse ****. I saw none of my points being "summarily dismissed." I saw all of them being ducked... ^

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Jun 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:01 am

I am quite sure that the points you made were considered by the legal experts and dismissed. 
The decision makers also have the advantage of being privy to the latest intel that neither you or me or the Associated Press have.,,
The president needs a way to bypass Congress if he thinks that we need to take immediate action no matter how many treaties are in place.
Argue all you want about how you think this emergency system is being abused but the fact remains that The President in every instance gets to make an opinion based decision to act preemptively instead of being forced to wait until he sees enemy missiles flying at us.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.