Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am

Firing an AR-15 at distances of 600 to 1000 yds.

Go to 27 mins for the results at 1,000 yds.

https://youtu.be/oUWvdHxEJfo?si=T4_Ar84-2Lp02-9p

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 2:43 pm

 Completely misses the point.

If only the little coward wasn't so vague
 

This can only be so because your OP and your video, particularly the part you wanted everyone to watch, was as usual vague and pointless as well. 
 

Skans » 25 Jun 2025, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 4:16 pm

This can only be so because your OP and your video, particularly the part you wanted everyone to watch, was as usual vague and pointless as well.

Are you a brick?

Tell me what you saw....
 

*Huey » 25 Jun 2025, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 2:58 pm

Dude, you stepped into some else's conversation, had no clue what it was about, got curb stomped, and whined about it.

Tiny,

You cannot make a case...

You have conceived one....there are indications of pre-natal development.   


Now it swirls around the drain.
 

Vegas » 25 Jun 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 3:40 pm

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

@Deezer Shoove  

Do you agree that this isn't spam?

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 5:18 pm

@Deezer Shoove  

Do you agree that this isn't spam?

       This is what you have stooped to now. You are so desperate to evade this question that you want it called spam. Questions aren't spam. It would be if I repeatedly posted it in the same post. I am simply quoting you and posting. 

You are so **** desperate to evade. All you do is evade. EVADE! EVADE! EVADE!

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am

Firing an AR-15 at distances of 600 to 1000 yds.

Go to 27 mins for the results at 1,000 yds.

https://youtu.be/oUWvdHxEJfo?si=T4_Ar84-2Lp02-9p

Crooks and MAGA Eye Ear Sharp Shooter

David Copperfield Ear Piercing in the huddle?

Cruising to Mercury where the Blue is True.  And @31st Arrival   relativistic effects happen.

No hope @roadkill  will understand the punchline of a black eye on The Ayatollah So..

https://youtu.be/A9e7R_k5Gn4?si=bN2xt3MkNWS3LlG9

Told ya..

Elon's Rockets can't make it off the test stand. He blew it up to collect on the insurance..

https://youtu.be/WOypE0DHeJc?si=82ln_K4mnLmDjOIZ
 
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 5:17 pm

Tiny,

You cannot make a case...

You have conceived one....there are indications of pre-natal development.   

Now it swirls around the drain.

the case was over before you involved yourself.  As usual I **** kicked you around like a soccer ball.  Get your daughter to help you and post something legit that shows the AR 15 does not fire a round that is categorized as an intermediate round. 

That is all youn gotta do.  Go ahead, bring it on.  Anything other than that is just you running.

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 4:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 4:57 am

the case was over before you involved yourself.  As usual I **** kicked you around like a soccer ball.  Get your daughter to help you and post something legit that shows the AR 15 does not fire a round that is categorized as an intermediate round. 

That is all youn gotta do.  Go ahead, bring it on.  Anything other than that is just you running.

There is no case...you wouldn't know a case from a goiter.

There's just you waging another battle with yourself.
 

That is all youn gotta do.

You gotta make a case.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 5:27 am

There is no case...you wouldn't know a case from a goiter.

There's just you waging another battle with yourself.

You gotta make a case.

I did.  Go back to that thread and try again.  That is where the record is.  There is NO ARGUMENT that the 5.56 NATO round is not an intermediate powered cartridge.  

As the source I posted shows.  

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:29 am

I did.  

Weapon v. Cartridge.

If the 5.56 can't knock a bird out of the sky, why are millions buying AR-15s to take on the gubmint?

Are they even dumber than you are?

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:34 am

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:29 am

I did.  

Weapon v. Cartridge.

If the 5.56 can't knock a bird out of the sky, why are millions buying AR-15s to take on the gubmint?

Are they even dumber than you are?

 

Why are you so afraid to go back to the thread where the info is?  You have a history of starting a new thread and reframing the issue.  I am not afraid of the record.  But it appears you are.  I will bump if for you.  

 

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:41 am

Why 

Answer the question, Coward.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:42 am

Answer the question, Coward.

 

I just bumped the thread.

Your question is idiocy.  
 

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:44 am

I .

You didn't post a case in the thread.

You were challenged to do so...

Of course, you ran.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:47 am

You didn't post a case in the thread.

You were challenged to do so...

Of course, you ran.

The thread has been bumped.  And stop lying, ROTC.

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:50 am

The thread has been bumped.  And stop lying, ROTC.

Bump your "case", Quimmie...

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:55 am

Bump your "case", Quimmie...

I did.  Have a it.

Stop lying.  I am don on this thread, Office Boy.  

*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2025, 6:58 am

I did.  Have a it.

Stop lying.  I am don on this thread, Office Boy.

Where is it?

Stop lying.