Someone using your logic would claim that 5% ABV Budweiser is high powered beer because it can kill you if you drink too much of it.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't post a case in the thread.
You were challenged to do so...
Of course, you ran.
Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Firing an AR-15 at distances of 600 to 1000 yds.
Go to 27 mins for the results at 1,000 yds.
https://youtu.be/oUWvdHxEJfo?si=T4_Ar84-2Lp02-9p
Stop right there.
A day later and I don't recall what the video was about. Its not worth watching again, so I'm just going to move on. If you can't state your position in your OP without relying on a long video to do it for you, please, don't expect others to invest that much time in it.
*Huey » 25 Jun 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ It is already a matter of recor.
Butt here it is in a nuitshell:
1. Someone post that that the round was high powered.
2. I then posted sourced info that it is a it was in the category of INTERMEDIATE charged cartridge.
3. You then butted in and posted ****.
4. I said the military is going to a larger round because the round isn't that good.
5. I then posted that even the military and military experts said it was not a good round and sourced it. You basically said a retired Major who shot the thing in combat was full of **** as were the accounts he put in his article.
Show me...1. Someone post that that the round was high powered.
Skans » 26 Jun 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ A day later and I don't recall what the video was about. Its not worth watching again, so I'm just going to move on. If you can't state your position in your OP without relying on a long video to do it for you, please, don't expect others to invest that much time in it.
because your OP and your video, particularly the part you wanted everyone to watch, was as usual vague and pointless as well.
When I sayIf you can't state your position in your OP without relying on a long video
If you have an actual point to make about a firearm or firearm related issue, just make it. Type it out in 2 sentences or less.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ When I say
"Skans, you're a **** idiot!"
You nod.
Ya follah?
Are you done eating?Skans » 26 Jun 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ If you have an actual point to make about a firearm or firearm related issue, just make it. Type it out in 2 sentences or less.
Then it's unanimous.
Forever? No.
You and @*HooooeyVagina could form a co-operative for condiments.
Yeah, ok. Do you a firearms related point you are trying to make?Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ You and @*HooooeyVagina could form a co-operative for condiments.
Save a bundle.
*Beekeeper » 26 Jun 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ It's NOT ME that's trying to FOOL PEOPLE into thinking YOU KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT 5.56 mm rounds of ammunition.
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
I don't believe the Marine Major he quoted was an REMF. He specifically called upon his combat experience.Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Firing an AR-15 at distances of 600 to 1000 yds.
Go to 27 mins for the results at 1,000 yds.
https://youtu.be/oUWvdHxEJfo?si=T4_Ar84-2Lp02-9p
He is. It clearly broke him.
He made his case. He called an expert witness.Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ You never posted a case...
I destroyed it in utero....