No, you.
You just responded to the case, you stupid queer, asking what the case is.Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ What is the CASE?
The weapon is clearly high powered if it will kill you at 1000 yds.
Then go ahead and articulate it.Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ You just responded to the case, you stupid queer, asking what the case is.
Everyone sees the case except you - because you think with your emotions, like a broad.
The weapon is clearly high powered if it will kill you at 1000 ydsCannonpointer » 26 Jun 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ No, you.
You made the new thread. He already bade his case in the old one.
Why should he keep trying topound sense into a senseless woman?
A .22 is high powered, you stupid fruit. It will kill me at 100 feet.Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ The weapon is clearly high powered if it will kill you at 1000 yds
can you read it now?
What **** case?Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ He made his case. He called an expert witness.
You short-footed it to a new thread, hoping for better luck.![]()
1000 YARDS...Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ A .22 is high powered, you stupid fruit. It will kill me at 100 feet.
But as categories go, that deadly, high powered .22 which will take my life is not CATEGORIZED as high powered.
Try, son. Just TRY.
Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑1000 YARDS...Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ A .22 is high powered, you stupid fruit. It will kill me at 100 feet.
But as categories go, that deadly, high powered .22 which will take my life is not CATEGORIZED as high powered.
Try, son. Just TRY.
The one that you were emotionally incapable of even hearing - much less assessing and responding appropriately to.
That last one is the longest.
Technically, the ammo that is used is not really 5.56 NATO. It a much higher grain with different characteristics.Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ Firing an AR-15 at distances of 600 to 1000 yds.
Go to 27 mins for the results at 1,000 yds.
https://youtu.be/oUWvdHxEJfo?si=T4_Ar84-2Lp02-9p
*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Technically, the ammo that is used is not really 5.56 NATO. It a much higher grain with different characteristics.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... ing/495652
Vaya con Huevos..
Is it available retail?*Huey » 26 Jun 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Technically, the ammo that is used is not really 5.56 NATO. It a much higher grain with different characteristics.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... ing/495652
You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answeredVegas » 26 Jun 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you ever do your own **** research? Look it up yourself. God damn narcissists. You retards always think you are owed **** from everybody. **** you.
You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answeredBlackvegetable » 26 Jun 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
I've heard that .22 LR pistols have been used to kill cattle at the slaughter yards.Cannonpointer » 26 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ A .22 is high powered, you stupid fruit. It will kill me at 100 feet.
But as categories go, that deadly, high powered .22 which will take my life is not CATEGORIZED as high powered.
Try, son. Just TRY.
*Beekeeper » 26 Jun 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ You DO realize that you just posted stuff that is so far over @Blackvegetable 's capability to understand that you will get the usual **** AND BLOVIATING QUESTIONS, right??