Liberal Forum

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:30 am

I don't carry rounds designed for combat.  

Here we go again.


Limit yourself to answering questions....the first time.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:30 am

When it comes to selecting the right ammunition for self-defense, understanding the key differences between hollow-point and full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds is crucial.

(You don't understand the difference)


 

Why do you believe this stuff is other than self evident?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:37 am

Why do you believe this stuff is other than self evident?

Have you bothered answering any of Huey's questions or are you going to stick with your usual MO and demand that he answers your 75k questions?

Vegas » 29 Jun 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:41 am

Have you bothered answering any of Huey's questions or are you going to stick with your usual MO and demand that he answers your 75k questions?

This will be amusing.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:42 am

This will be amusing.

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:31 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:30 am

I don't carry rounds designed for combat.  

Here we go again.


Limit yourself to answering questions....the first time.

 

****, that is going to be a one for one proposition.  Now, post one question you want answered on this subject.

Right now I just curb stomped your ***.  You were dumb to claim that any round designed for the battlefield should not be in the hands of civilians.  Now, you question please..

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:46 am

****, that is going to be a one for one proposition.  

No case.

No argument.

No point.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:52 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:46 am

****, that is going to be a one for one proposition.  

No case.

No argument.

No point.

 

You are one **** when you lose.  Why would I carry rounds designed for the battlefield.  

I don't carry rounds designed for combat.  Many with CCPs don't because they are not that great for self defense.  Keep talking....you look dumber by the post.

Read the first sentence then read the snippet I posted:

When it comes to selecting the right ammunition for self-defense, understanding the key differences between hollow-point and full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds is crucial.

(You don't understand the difference)

In contrast, full metal jacket (FMJ) ammunition features a bullet with no exposed lead on the nose or sides. FMJ rounds are commonly used for training purposes due to their affordability and reliability in semi-automatic firearms. However, they are not typically recommended for self-defense scenarios.One of the main drawbacks of FMJ ammunition is its tendency to over-penetrate. Unlike hollow-points, which expand upon impact and transfer all of their energy to the target, FMJ rounds may pass through the intended target and continue traveling, posing a risk to bystanders or property beyond the initial point of impact. This phenomenon is often likened to a pencil punching a hole through a target but then persisting in its trajectory.
 Unless mandated by law, opting for FMJ ammunition for self-defense carries significant considerations. Perfect target isolation and awareness of what lies beyond the target are essential when using FMJ rounds to minimize the risk of unintended consequences.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/h ... led-carry/

You logic is base on your ignorance to the subject.  **** Off, *******.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:53 am

You are one **** when you lose.  Why would I carry rounds designed for the battlefield.  


 

When did this become about you?

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:56 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:53 am

You are one **** when you lose.  Why would I carry rounds designed for the battlefield.  

I don't carry rounds designed for combat.  Many with CCPs don't because they are not that great for self defense.  Keep talking....you look dumber by the post.

Read the first sentence then read the snippet I posted:

When it comes to selecting the right ammunition for self-defense, understanding the key differences between hollow-point and full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds is crucial.

(You don't understand the difference)

In contrast, full metal jacket (FMJ) ammunition features a bullet with no exposed lead on the nose or sides. FMJ rounds are commonly used for training purposes due to their affordability and reliability in semi-automatic firearms. However, they are not typically recommended for self-defense scenarios.One of the main drawbacks of FMJ ammunition is its tendency to over-penetrate. Unlike hollow-points, which expand upon impact and transfer all of their energy to the target, FMJ rounds may pass through the intended target and continue traveling, posing a risk to bystanders or property beyond the initial point of impact. This phenomenon is often likened to a pencil punching a hole through a target but then persisting in its trajectory.
 Unless mandated by law, opting for FMJ ammunition for self-defense carries significant considerations. Perfect target isolation and awareness of what lies beyond the target are essential when using FMJ rounds to minimize the risk of unintended consequences.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/h ... led-carry/

You logic is base on your ignorance to the subject.  **** Off, *******.

 

When did this become about you?

 

 

It is about this claim of yours:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

Just applying your logic.

That's NOT my logic..

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:51 am

YOU said 33 miles as well:

BV 33 miles:  viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521

You rolled hundreds of miles to meet with the blufftard, and he hid in his duplex afraid to come out - after all that barking. 

What a ******. But when you look at the size of those feet, you kinda feel bad for the loud mouth.

I mean, there are actual chianaman women roiling in envy. 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:06 pm

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:51 am

YOU said 33 miles as well:

BV 33 miles:  viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521

You rolled hundreds of miles to meet with the blufftard, and he hid in his duplex afraid to come out - after all that barking. 

What a ******. But when you look at the size of those feet, you kinda feel bad for the loud mouth.

I mean, there are actual chianaman women roiling in envy.

Well, the purpose of the trip was to catch a couple of yankee games in Boston.  He was just a bonus.  
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 10:06 am

Where did you stop and get off the train?

He got off the train hundreds of miles from his home - right down the road from your duplex-cum-spider-hole. 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:08 pm

He got off the train hundreds of miles from his home - right down the road from your duplex-cum-spider-hole.

"Down the road"?

No cars?
 

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 10:10 am

You could stop with the double posts at any time. You have been lying and lying about this for years.  Even YOU claimed I was 33 miles away.  The purpose of the trip was not about you.  Getting to embarrass you after years of threats was just a bonus. Carry on, Pepper Spray.

You're damned lucky it wasn't ME you were coming to challenge.

I'd have EAGERLY attended and delivered a BRUTAL lesson (allergies permitting, of course). 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm

"Down the road"?

No cars?

What is this that I spy with my little eye?

Two questions, fruitcake?
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:10 pm

You're damned lucky it wasn't ME you were coming to challenge.

I'd have EAGERLY attended and delivered a BRUTAL lesson (allergies permitting, of course).

Nah, you remember years ago I told you let's just sit down, have some beer, and talk about how epic it would have been?

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:12 pm

Nah, you remember years ago I told you let's just sit down, have some beer, and talk about how epic it would have been?

       
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm

"Down the road"?

No cars?

Seems U R a coward.
 

Mrkelly » 27 Jun 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 2:29 pm

I forgot about  @Jantje_Smit  

@sooted up Cyndi  would have been a hoot

Slutted up slutty didn't exist, "she" was a construct.