You are a true thespian seeking power, wealth, and fame at heart. Career before understanding your time in life adapting as displaced equally here.
Choke on the horse dick pulled out of your fathers *** dick sucking ***.31stArrival » 01 Jul 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ You are a true thespian seeking power, wealth, and fame at heart. Career before understanding your time in life adapting as displaced equally here.
I have talked to probably 5 or 6 on the phone but I have never met one in person*Huey » 27 Jun 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I was once 33 miles from a forum member, one who threatened me constantly, and he decided cowardice was the better part of valor.
I have met one in the past and it was fun. I won’t say whom it was.
Ancestors Perpetually Evolving descended from A.P.E's as all you have been since the chromosomes of your cellular body arrived when conceived left to adapt in space specifically you regardless who you believe you should have been socially after birth.murdock » 04 Jul 2025, 2:27 am » wrote: ↑ Smelly sue and 31 horse dicks in his *** are your mom and dad.
31 horse dicks up your *** smelly smelly sue is selling you crack!31stArrival » 04 Jul 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑ Ancestors Perpetually Evolving descended from A.P.E's as all you have been since the chromosomes of your cellular body arrived when conceived left to adapt in space specifically you regardless who you believe you should have been socially after birth.
Positions of choices made, people by promises kept, life by the numbers limited to evolve in their own skin one at a time geographically here, specifically positioned, now.
Again I will say in series parallel hearts beating one at a time with personal brains navigating their time alive so far. >Self evident displacement no exceptions or exemptions by intellectual theories or theologies governed mankind last 7,000 years r recorded history of day in and day out results.
Genetic accountability of why, how, what, where, when, which, whom in each ancestor's DNA the specific people lived prior to their conception so far.
Context vs chromosomes. vocabulary vs numbers occupying time in this atmosphere, now.
You really play the victim of tyranny of chromosomes from personal DNA results all the time. Demanding human rights to pretend you are more than your time alive.murdock » 04 Jul 2025, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑ 31 horse dicks up your *** smelly smelly sue is selling you crack!
You need to be locked away. You're the most **** up bastard I've ever seen! Perhaps lightening can fry your **** up ***!31stArrival » 04 Jul 2025, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ You really play the victim of tyranny of chromosomes from personal DNA results all the time. Demanding human rights to pretend you are more than your time alive.
I can explain why you are here one at a time and you cannot prove your time is more than mine evolving per individual heartbeat and brain navigating space exactly where each of us is geographically here now, in plain sight now of our own time displaced.
Total sum of my behavior was mentally feeling out of place in every reality I tried to fit into socially and that includes my own ancestry until I got made as hell at humanity in 2006. This month is the anniversary of my mother's death induced by the American legal system was currently operating then.
I used what I was taught to believe that it is better to get even(balance out) what tries to rule your time alive since birth because living begins with conceived as one of a kind so far.
Success with living eternally separated is being alive each next rotation forward surviving at correcting your own mistakes made previously.
Personal responsibility to understand everything about time living forward isn't the same thing as social duty to keeping evolving easier for all lifetimes within this atmosphere living now all limited to adapting since arriving a fertilized cell in the equal time of 31st parallel to genetic outcomes per ancestral lineage so far.
Cloning doesn't change how evolving happens, and all realities do us control how those alive live daily here by some hypothetical standard of staying in character cradle to grave builds better days in 3 phase denials 4 parts of a day, 4 seasons a year happening 8 times a revolution around the star averaged 3rd rock from the sun with each ancestor of each generation gap live specifically as they existed or now wouldn't be what is left evolving forward so far.
My brain navigates being alive each heart beat forward until it doesn't beat anymore. Your mind obeys linear time logistics as all you want to believe possible is life exceeds your equal time living here now.
Can you imagine how that becomes bi polar disorder in every case of ancestral lineages having it regardless race, creed, color, national origin, gender biases, generation gap, male, female lifetime in the atmosphere so far?
the mind over matter anything else is possible among people that will not accept what isn't ever going to happen once. Life exceeds adapting to the moment here. regardless which God or country people by context governing content with hypothetical tomorrows 7 days a week are in today.
Back to out of sight, out of mind methodology about any ancestor being honest about self evident time life evolves naturally positioned since inception of their ancestral lineages standing their equal time adapting forward now each generation gap forward so far.murdock » 04 Jul 2025, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑ You need to be locked away. You're the most **** up bastard I've ever seen! Perhaps lightening can fry your **** up ***!
Thank you for the confirmation you sick twisted **** stain!31stArrival » 04 Jul 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ Back to out of sight, out of mind methodology about any ancestor being honest about self evident time life evolves naturally positioned since inception of their ancestral lineages standing their equal time adapting forward now each generation gap forward so far.
Power of suggesting anything else is possible tomorrow midnight to noon factually distorts time living dawn to dusk every rotation in history so far.
3 phases of time create the economic rule of 72 between yesterday dawn to dusk is never same results noon to midnight as arriving midnight to noon. all 4 dimensions of each rotation daily here.
Now add the 4 seasons changing climate 8 times a revolution of the planet around the star in the same 365.2422 days a year factually covered up with a February 29 every 4th year.
then there is the factual missing 3 minutes and 56 seconds a rotation of the planet 24/7. It was never missing physically. Just like a **** national debt.
murdock » 04 Jul 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ Thank you for the confirmation you sick twisted **** stain!
Where does the Second Amendment make such distinctions? If it does not,on what jurisprudence do YOU base your argument?Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ That's NOT my logic..
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
Mr. Vegetable, you are one odd duck. Today you claimed you were talking about the round. But two days you were talking about the actual weapon.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑That's NOT my logic..*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat. And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.
Just applying your logic.
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
CP, he is a very confused fellow. Just today he claimed he was not discussing the 9 mil weapon but the round itself. Here is is discussing the weapon. I schooled Mr Vegetable on the fact that the 9 MIL FMJ optimized for the military for combat was not recommended for civilian defense rounds because it is weaker and does not expand. It has a tendency to go thru the target and hit bystanders.Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2025, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑Where does the Second Amendment make such distinctions? If it does not,on what jurisprudence do YOU base your argument?Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ That's NOT my logic..
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
Sorry for the question marks - I know you're vadgelergic.
Either Trump or Jeff Skunk Baxter...
Just run*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ CP, he is a very confused fellow. Just today he claimed he was not discussing the 9 mil weapon but the round itself.
Never.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, you are one odd duck. Today you claimed you were talking about the round. But two days you were talking about the actual weapon.
Here you are calling for a ban on the 9 mil handgun.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑Never.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, you are one odd duck. Today you claimed you were talking about the round. But two days you were talking about the actual weapon.
Here you are calling for a ban on the 9 mil handgun.
You're an idiot.
Mr. Vegetable, you area a fiery LITTLE fellow, aren't you? I had to repost my entire comment because once again you deleted the important bits. See ya tomorrow my small little friend. After I respond to the last comment of yours I am out for the night.Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑Just run*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ CP, he is a very confused fellow. Just today he claimed he was not discussing the 9 mil weapon but the round itself.
*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑CP, he is a very confused fellow. Just today he claimed he was not discussing the 9 mil weapon but the round itself. Here is is discussing the weapon. I schooled Mr Vegetable on the fact that the 9 MIL FMJ optimized for the military for combat was not recommended for civilian defense rounds because it is weaker and does not expand. It has a tendency to go thru the target and hit bystanders.Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2025, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑Where does the Second Amendment make such distinctions? If it does not,on what jurisprudence do YOU base your argument?Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ That's NOT my logic..
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
Sorry for the question marks - I know you're vadgelergic.
It is recommended for range practice and plinking, not self defense. I then thanked him for supporting the fact that I can keep my more powerful and more physically devastating expanding defense rounds.