Liberal Forum

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 3:58 pm

Mr. Vegetable,  you area a 

you're going to run from your words.

You may as well start now.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 3:59 pm

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 3:58 pm

Mr. Vegetable,  you area a 

you're going to run from your words.

You may as well start now.

 

Mr. Vegetable, not sure what words you are worried I will run from because when you quote you keep deleting my words.  So, hopefully, sir, by tomorrow you will have this all worked out and you will be able to, with precision and specificity not only post those words of mine but exactly what stand you are taking to show what issue you have with them.

You have a lovely evening, Sir.  Has the rain stopped in Salem?   

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 3:55 pm

Mr. Vegetable, when you

You're a tedious little cuck.

Both the AR-15 and the NATO 5.56 were developed, not only for combat, but for a specific type of combat.

This is a history with you were entirely unfamiliar until I explained it to you.

Nod.
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:04 pm

Mr. Vegetable, not sure what words you are worried I will run from 

Pick any...

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:05 pm

Pick any...

Speaking of you running. Check this out, We can always count on a narcissist accusing others of what they are guilty of. 




1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:28 pm

Speaking of you running. Check this out, We can always count on a narcissist accusing others of what they are guilty of. 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

 

Every option includes your definition,

Neither A, B nor D satisfy my definition. 

Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

"Definition" is singular, yet you list two.

You're a **** idiot.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm

Neither A, B nor D satisfy my definition. 

"Definition" is singular, yet you list two.

You're a **** idiot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcMfj0WZ_0M
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm

Neither A, B nor D satisfy my definition. 

"Definition" is singular, yet you list two.

You're a **** idiot.

We already went through this. For God sakes. You are always in a **** loop. Why do you think I have 100% accuracy on you? 


**** your non-answers. I don't give a **** that you don't want to be accountable to an answer, Not my problem

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:43 pm

We already went through this. For God sakes. 

So why persist with your failure?

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:03 pm

So why persist with your failure?

Because it's your failure. 

Post your answer. 

1. You will continue with your process of elimination answer. Thus, you think that will save you from being accountable to the answer. 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:05 pm

Because it's your failure. 

 

I didn't post 3 irrelevant non examples.

I didn't post "definition" and "or".

You're a failure...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:12 pm

I didn't post 3 irrelevant non examples.

I didn't post "definition" and "or".

You're a failure...

You didn't post your answer nor your defense of your answer. 

Shut up already. 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:17 pm

You didn't post your answer nor your defense of your answer. 

Shut up already.

I prefer to leave you and @Buck Naked  in suspense...

nor your defense of your answer. 

when you demonstrate a qualification to judge.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm

I prefer to leave you and @Buck Naked  in suspense...

when you demonstrate a qualification to judge.

Translation: You have no **** clue. 

You aren't leaving me in suspense. I already demonstrated that this is a win-win for me. You answer - I win because you will demonstrate your ignorance. You don't answer- I win, because it demonstrates your ignorance. 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 6:37 pm

Translation: You have no **** clue. 

You aren't leaving me in suspense. I already demonstrated that this is a win-win for me. You answer - I win because you will demonstrate your ignorance. You don't answer- I win, because it demonstrates your ignorance.

I have eliminated three of four options.

Of course, this is not enough for you and your fellow moron.

- I win because you will demonstrate your ignorance. 

YOU ARE USING MY DEFINITION, YOU **** IDIOT.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:17 pm

I have eliminated three of four options.


 

Just stop. We already went through this ****. I am not accepting non-answers. You not want wanting to be held accountable to an answer is not my **** problem.



How many times...how many **** times....over and over and over and over...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=341s
 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:52 pm

Just stop. We already went through this ****. I am not accepting non-answers. 

Tell someone who cares how you feel.

You're too stupid to figure it out from there..

It's win/win for me.

MR-7 » 27 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 1:15 pm

from this forum, at a bar or other place, who would it be? 

I would buy you a beer MR-7..

BV and CanonPointer seem to have wisdom.

I remember making OP's "Where's the NHB Convention? "

Right about now funk soul brother..  I dont think anyone wants to see anybody.  Half the people can't talk, and half the people talk too much.

You are a protected class.  You can post links.  I can't

I know I am going to meet Prince The ghost who was formerly a human musician someday. 

*31stArrival » 27 Jun 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 2:24 pm

Jantje_Smit

He likes playing devil's advocate with me, but I think his brain works naturally adapting in plain sight, but won't admit it in public. he was the person that informed me of sootedupcyndi died last year.

She did not die.

Funny Guy » 30 Jul 2025, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:54 pm

She did not die.

Why would I believe you?