Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 11:12 am

LMAO!  This is why I have to repeat myself.  You keep repeating the same lie.

1.  Even you admitted I was 33 miles from your cowardly ***.

2.  You did not know where I stayed until at least a YEAR LATER.  You were never asked to meet me in Braintree.  Not once, Cowardly Too Far.

I'm off to the store. And I am carrying a firearm loaded with a round that was designed for combat. Well, maybe not because they are polymer tipped defense rounds and are a no no on the battlefield.

Cowardly Too Far.

This HAS to be good..... 

I'm off to the store. And I am carrying a firearm loaded with a round that was designed for combat. Well, maybe not because they are polymer tipped defense rounds and are a no no on the battlefield.

nothing sqealing little quimmie cowardly too far about that....

 

Have no clue what that means.  But no, it is only 2 miles away.  Look at the address you have on me and then get direction to Harris Teeter.  Or just expand the map I sent you.  Then look to the NE.  Oh, for idiots like you that would be up a little to the right.

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 12:17 pm

Less than intermediate.  But using BV's logic it is high powered because it was designed for combat.  

Tiny, 

You may stop lying at any time...

You can't,  but you have my permission.
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:24 pm

Tiny, 

You may stop lying at any time...

You can't,  but you have my permission.

Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

Just applying your logic.

 

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm

Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

Just applying your logic.

That's NOT my logic..

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
 

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:24 pm

Have no clue what that means.  But no, it is only 2 miles away.  

Where is the answer to the question asked?

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:40 pm

Where is the answer to the question asked?

        He is back at it. Refusing to answer questions while demanding answers to his. 

1. Copy that to use for your projections ^^^

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm

That's NOT my logic..

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

Gotcha, ya stupid ****

So according to this illiterate gun moron rounds like FMJ 9 mil, 45 ACP, 45 Long Colt, 7.62, etc are not appropriate for civilian use.

Keep in mind military rounds are FMJ.  Not hollow points or any other round that is designed to penetrate and then fragment. That is due to the rules of landfall and The Hague Conventions.

LMAO!  This is why I have to repeat myself.  You keep repeating the same lie.

In addition to the various advantages afforded by FMJ rounds, the Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III, prohibits the use in international warfare of bullets that easily expand or flatten in the body.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_meta ... mmunition)


So cool.  The only time I use FMJ is when on the range.  They are called range rounds.  I carry defense which do fragment when you hit something.  They are far more devastating to the human body than FMJ.

Get the **** out of myth face with this ****.  You are not smart enough to be in this conversation.  

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:24 pm

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 11:12 am

LMAO!  This is why I have to repeat myself.  You keep repeating the same lie.

1.  Even you admitted I was 33 miles from your cowardly ***.

2.  You did not know where I stayed until at least a YEAR LATER.  You were never asked to meet me in Braintree.  Not once, Cowardly Too Far.

I'm off to the store. And I am carrying a firearm loaded with a round that was designed for combat. Well, maybe not because they are polymer tipped defense rounds and are a no no on the battlefield.

Cowardly Too Far.

This HAS to be good..... 

I'm off to the store. And I am carrying a firearm loaded with a round that was designed for combat. Well, maybe not because they are polymer tipped defense rounds and are a no no on the battlefield.

nothing sqealing little quimmie cowardly too far about that....


 

Have no clue what that means.  But no, it is only 2 miles away.  Look at the address you have on me and then get direction to Harris Teeter.  Or just expand the map I sent you.  Then look to the NE.  Oh, for idiots like you that would be up a little to the right.

 

Not sure what question you are whining about now.  Since you finally, and hilariously, answered the question about banning round designed for combat I certainly will answer if  if tell me what you want answered.  Remember this is a one for one deal.  If you can't live with that, **** off.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm

That's NOT my logic..

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

I bet you're one of those **** idiots that think 5.56 rounds tumble.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:22 pm

You assert you came within 33 miles.

Where did you stop, get off the train, and huddle in terror?

I'd like to see you in alligator Alcatraz.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:22 pm

Where did you stop, get off the train, and huddle in terror?

We got off early and huddled in terror because we heard your mom was coming for our dicks!

murdock » 28 Jun 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:26 pm

We got off early and huddled in terror because we heard your mom was coming for our dicks!

Lorena the Black Vegetable Bobbit?

OUCH!

murdock » 28 Jun 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:12 pm

I bet you're one of those **** idiots that think 5.56 rounds tumble.

You are referring to the flight of the bullet, which is correct. It does tumble...once it hits the body. This is what makes it deadly...Ball rounds are deadly, contrary to what anyone thinks. Don't ever shoot game with a 5.56 ball round. It will destroy the meat. I carry Ball Ammo in all my weapons, for one simple reason. I know where to place my rounds.

The 5.56 NATO bullet does not tumble in flight1. Instead, it can yaw or tumble upon impact, especially when it hits soft, flexible materials like flesh1. The tumbling is more accurately described as fragmentation and yawing2.

MR-7 » 28 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 2:44 pm

You are referring to the flight of the bullet, which is correct. It does tumble...once it hits the body. This is what makes it deadly...Ball rounds are deadly, contrary to what anyone thinks. Don't ever shoot game with a 5.56 ball round. It will destroy the meat. I carry Ball Ammo in all my weapons, for one simple reason. I know where to place my rounds.

The 5.56 NATO bullet does not tumble in flight1. Instead, it can yaw or tumble upon impact, especially when it hits soft, flexible materials like flesh1. The tumbling is more accurately described as fragmentation and yawing2.

What does an office hole punch do to an ear? Asking for someone with no precision.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOiZP8FS5Ww
 
 

*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 1:50 pm

Not sure 

You don't answer any....what difference does it make?

Do so the first time and we won't be let down by your **** recall.

Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 4:12 pm

You don't answer any....what difference does it make?

Do so the first time and we won't be let down by your **** recall.

If we are going to do a third party like it's 1999..


Why not bring a real Prince back for 2028?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rblt2EtFfC4

*GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Jun 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 12:25 pm

There is very little doubt that Bsee subscribes to Vanity Fair too     

 

31stArrival » 27 Jun 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 2:24 pm

Jantje_Smit

He likes playing devil's advocate with me, but I think his brain works naturally adapting in plain sight, but won't admit it in public. he was the person that informed me of sootedupcyndi died last year.

You get my vote too, and Cyndi's... my brain doesn't cope well with beer ingested plain sight but I'm sure we would have an interesting discussion about the missing point in now being eternity.. not that you would admit it but you know I would prove you wrong..

 
 

Mrkelly » 27 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jun 2025, 2:50 pm

  that’s what I would like to see you say with a straight face

You don't have to worry about that, omh would, that's what would make it fun.. the missing part..

 
 

Jantje_Smit » 29 Jun 2025, 4:49 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 4:49 am

You get my vote too, and Cyndi's... my brain doesn't cope well with beer ingested plain sight but I'm sure we would have an interesting discussion about the missing point in now being eternity.. not that you would admit it but you know I would prove you wrong..

:faint:  
 

the most you can prove is inaccurate by transposition of results or didn't include every detail about life limited to eternally separated within series parallel hearts beating now as ancestors are specifically eternally separated when adapting to space inhabiting the moment here with ever changing forms shaped since conception by whatever the previous generations were within plant or animal results, predator or prey nature of each ancestral lineage, generation gap so far, and specific ancestor living as adapting here now regardless universal geographical location within specific galaxy, solar system, planetary atmosphere, species of life, in a specific food chain, currently living as performing forward in series parallel time of a perpetual balancing outcomes now.

Contextual artificial knowledge is factual interpretations of life being more than it ever was so far. Doesn't matter which language arts is used, context through alphabets to each society here past or current events, chromosomes separating ancestors in an atmosphere, periodic elements combined as universal positions evolving as forms shaped universally here, computer binary code indexing with zero or ones.

The whole is equal to total sum of all its parts here now. This has always been the core of life lived eternally separated when results are eternally separated now.

Complete accountability done ^^^^^^. Brevity is the sole of witnessing one's own time uniquely alive now, between organic 4 event horizons of inception, conception, death, extinction, within a universal position of earth, wind, water, fire, heart, mind, body, intellectual soul is each person's brain navigating time equally displaced so far.

Nuances exist by reasonable doubt misleading every ancestor living in their relative time adapting here occupying time with a beating heart now regardless which generation gap lived or alive. Back to the binary code of zero or one and the concept in economics of zero sum gain.

You really need to change your mind and really accept what you were since a fertilized cell its nucleus is the brain you use to mind social consensus 24/7.