Liberal Forum

One in particular is video evidence. There was a time where we could always trust video. Video never lies. Pictures can be edited, but nobody thought it would be possible to manipulate video without easily noticing. These days, AI can create just about any fake video that looks 100% authentic. 

There are plenty of disadvantages, but there are two in particular that concern me: 

1.  People may begin doubting authentic videos, weakening the reliability of video evidence. Real wrongdoers can claim incriminating videos are fake, avoiding accountability. That could easily be reasonable doubt. 

2. Future generations may find it impossible to know what actually happened in our time. Students or researchers could create fake documentary evidence for claims.

What is recorded as fact today will last for generations onward...yet, what if it was AI and not reality?
 

Vegas » 28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm

One in particular is video evidence. There was a time where we could always trust video. Video never lies. Pictures can be edited, but nobody thought it would be possible to manipulate video without easily noticing. These days, AI can create just about any fake video that looks 100% authentic. 

There are plenty of disadvantages, but there are two in particular that concern me: 

1.  People may begin doubting authentic videos, weakening the reliability of video evidence. Real wrongdoers can claim incriminating videos are fake, avoiding accountability. That could easily be reasonable doubt. 

2. Future generations may find it impossible to know what actually happened in our time. Students or researchers could create fake documentary evidence for claims.

What is recorded as fact today will last for generations onward...yet, what if it was AI and not reality?

We believe truth over facts 

Vegas » 28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm

One in particular is video evidence. There was a time where we could always trust video. Video never lies. Pictures can be edited, but nobody thought it would be possible to manipulate video without easily noticing. These days, AI can create just about any fake video that looks 100% authentic. 

There are plenty of disadvantages, but there are two in particular that concern me: 

1.  People may begin doubting authentic videos, weakening the reliability of video evidence. Real wrongdoers can claim incriminating videos are fake, avoiding accountability. That could easily be reasonable doubt. 

2. Future generations may find it impossible to know what actually happened in our time. Students or researchers could create fake documentary evidence for claims.

What is recorded as fact today will last for generations onward...yet, what if it was AI and not reality?
 

you want to eliminate reasonable doubt every artificial intelligence creates facts supports 24/7 ideas life isn't self evident time alive?

Navigate your history of adapting in plain sight by heartbeat acquired since the zygote stage of your personal evolving chromosomes here now.

It reveals so much you missed serving humanity promising better tomorrows by intellectual doubt of all you were since a fertilized cell.

Buck Naked » 29 Jun 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:12 am

We believe truth over facts 

Are not truths syllables same as facts showing how people never accepted their natural time living eternally separated in their actual biological time here?

Caught cha denying to yourself again trying to keep everyone else doing the same behavior cradle to grave.

the world is but a stage, but this atmosphere is home to each reproduction lived eternally separated since personal conception.

Vegas » 28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm

One in particular is video evidence. There was a time where we could always trust video. Video never lies. Pictures can be edited, but nobody thought it would be possible to manipulate video without easily noticing. These days, AI can create just about any fake video that looks 100% authentic. 

There are plenty of disadvantages, but there are two in particular that concern me: 

1.  People may begin doubting authentic videos, weakening the reliability of video evidence. Real wrongdoers can claim incriminating videos are fake, avoiding accountability. That could easily be reasonable doubt. 

2. Future generations may find it impossible to know what actually happened in our time. Students or researchers could create fake documentary evidence for claims.

What is recorded as fact today will last for generations onward...yet, what if it was AI and not reality?

I heard a story someone faked being the CEO of a company and they wired 5 Million to his account.  

My youtube feed is getting flooded with the Doomsday AI Skynet speculations.  I saw a video  about your exact concern in your post this am.  I wouldn't be surprised if the damn thing could crawl the web and tattoo MS13 on the knuckles  of Abrego Garcia on every photo on the internet.

 
 

BuckNaked » 29 Jun 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 9:12 am

We believe truth over facts

What?

Vegas » 28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm

One in particular is video evidence. There was a time where we could always trust video. Video never lies. Pictures can be edited, but nobody thought it would be possible to manipulate video without easily noticing. These days, AI can create just about any fake video that looks 100% authentic. 

There are plenty of disadvantages, but there are two in particular that concern me: 

1.  People may begin doubting authentic videos, weakening the reliability of video evidence. Real wrongdoers can claim incriminating videos are fake, avoiding accountability. That could easily be reasonable doubt. 

2. Future generations may find it impossible to know what actually happened in our time. Students or researchers could create fake documentary evidence for claims.

What is recorded as fact today will last for generations onward...yet, what if it was AI and not reality?

Sums up with a question. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:23 pm

Sums up with a question.

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 
 

Vegas » 28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2025, 9:33 pm

One in particular is video evidence. There was a time where we could always trust video. Video never lies. Pictures can be edited, but nobody thought it would be possible to manipulate video without easily noticing. These days, AI can create just about any fake video that looks 100% authentic. 

There are plenty of disadvantages, but there are two in particular that concern me: 

1.  People may begin doubting authentic videos, weakening the reliability of video evidence. Real wrongdoers can claim incriminating videos are fake, avoiding accountability. That could easily be reasonable doubt. 

2. Future generations may find it impossible to know what actually happened in our time. Students or researchers could create fake documentary evidence for claims.

What is recorded as fact today will last for generations onward...yet, what if it was AI and not reality?

jerrab » 29 Jun 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:29 pm

I don't understand.

AI Overview
The image displays a colorful, abstract design that resembles a twisted or spiraling pattern, often associated with fractal art or optical illusions.
It features vibrant purple, blue, and yellow-white hues arranged in a radial, swirling form against a black background.
The design creates a sense of depth and movement, characteristic of visual illusions or computer-generated fractal images.
Similar patterns are used in various artistic and design contexts, including digital art and abstract photography.

----------------------
what  I like about ai are the instantaneous descriptions and close matches
 

Vegas » 29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm

I don't understand.

my next post explains

Vegas » 29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:30 pm

I don't understand.

search with google lens

Vegas » 29 Jun 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:15 am

What?

Buck naked hates facts..  Because they are Truth.

Like the fact his brain is fried on Ecstacy
 

Vegas » 29 Jun 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 11:15 am

What?

that’s a famous quote Biden said 

BuckNaked » 29 Jun 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 1:55 pm

that’s a famous quote Biden said

        That makes sense.

jerrab » 29 Jun 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:29 pm

Kind of gay if you ask me
 

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 2:35 pm

Kind of gay if you ask me

I didn't. 

jerrab » 29 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 2:48 pm

I didn't.

Fair enough....uh, do you make these hypnotic hypnosis digital images?
 

MR-7 » 29 Jun 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 2:51 pm

Fair enough....uh, do you make these hypnotic hypnosis digital images?

kaleidoscope