Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:36 am

Piles of gibberish can't obscure the absence of a case.




 

theories and theologies are factual gibberish about life exceeding time each reproduction is adapting in space daily here as specifically eternally separated by adapting forward each additional heartbeat forward now.

Huey will protect you by sending my post to peanut gallery as what I said about you applies to every character serving humanity in this atmosphere having picked a side of interpreting life larger than adapting to the moment to die for cradle to grave.

each ancestral lineage and every generation gap is involved even in my own ancestry.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:26 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480


 

Tiny is lying.

 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:43 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:36 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 11:04 am

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

These are your words as link below:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

Where you are repllying to my post about 9 Mil, exactly what is like the AR 15, which I did not mention?

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.

Piles of gibberish can't obscure the absence of a case.

Your opinion is noted.

We are still unaware what  weapon is ike the COTL AE 15 mentionioned in your sentence here:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

Until you clarify Sir, we will just go with the fact you were referring to the 9 Mil and your opinion it is not appropriate for civilian use.

Those are you words, Sir.

 

We are still unaware what weapon is like the COLT AR 15 mentioned in your sentence here:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.

Unless it is a long overdue admission that you've been lying, I have no interest.

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:26 am

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480



 

Tiny is lying.

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:43 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:36 am

Piles of gibberish can't obscure the absence of a case.

Your opinion is noted.

We are still unaware what  weapon is ike the COTL AE 15 mentionioned in your sentence here:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

Until you clarify Sir, we will just go with the fact you were referring to the 9 Mil and your opinion it is not appropriate for civilian use.

Those are you words, Sir.

We are still unaware what weapon is like the COLT AR 15 mentioned in your sentence here:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:59 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.

Unless it is a long overdue admission that you've been lying, I have no interest.

 

Um, Sir, I must point out your words are posted in full, with no edits, in context, with a link, and VERBATIM.  As a man would do it.  

Sir, you will point out the lie.

In the mean time you words indicate you think that the 9mm is not appropriate for civilian use.

Since you said like the AR 15 that means you want it banned.

I guess you are not an honorable man.
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:01 am

Um, Sir, I must point out your words are posted in full, with no edits, in context, with a link, and VERBATIM.  As a man would do it.  

Sir, you will point out the lie.

In the mean time you words indicate you think that the 9mm is not appropriate for civilian use.

Since you said like the AR 15 that means you want it banned.

I guess you are not an honorable man.

The question has been answered repeatedly.

Your "argument" has gone from

Implied


Outright said


Back to implied


to

Indicate


while "round" has become "weapon"



I guess you are not an honorable man.
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.

We are still unaware what weapon is like the COLT AR 15 mentioned in your sentence here:

For when you go back and change this...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:10 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.

We are still unaware what weapon is like the COLT AR 15 mentioned in your sentence here:

For when you go back and change this...

 

Sir, I will be More than happy to change it once you telL US what weapon is LIKE the COLT AR 15 in response to a post that talks of the 9MM, NOT THE COLT AR 15!

You words in context, with a link, in full and verbatim as well as my post:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Go ahead and tell us. Or sir, to use one your charges, keep running from your words.

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am

Sir, I will be More than happy to change it once you telL 

 

You've been told.

But now you must resolve whether you continue to confuse it with a weapon or a round....

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:10 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

 Sir Just wanted to make sure you did not miss this.

We are still unaware what weapon is like the COLT AR 15 mentioned in your sentence here:

For when you go back and change this...


 

Sir, I will be More than happy to change it once you telL US what weapon is LIKE the COLT AR 15 in response to a post that talks of the 9MM, NOT THE COLT AR 15!

You words in context, with a link, in full and verbatim as well as my post:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Go ahead and tell us. Or sir, to use one your charges, keep running from your words.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:16 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am

Sir, I will be More than happy to change it once you telL 


 

You've been told.

But now you must resolve whether you continue to confuse it with a weapon or a round....

 

Sir, I do not in partial quotes.

You did not make the stanchion.  If the was the case you would have said so weeks ago.

Let me educate you on the rounds.  The military full metal jacket ammunition due to Rules of Land Warfare.  We are a signatory to that convention.  Now, that said, if you wish to ban that round, go ahead and fight for it. 

Most of use FMJ as range rounds.  To practice with because it is cheap.  Most of carry DEFENSE rounds that are much more powerful and devastating to your body.  According to the convention about hollow points, etc, they are banned.

So by all means, since you think you are the expert on this, ban FMJ.  Which is the round optimized for combat.

And no, that is not good enough to change my comment.  You had weeks to clarify and come up with that fluff.  You didn't


 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:21 am

Sir, I do not in partial quotes.


 

I don't do effluvium from which you will run.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:23 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:21 am

Sir, I do not in partial quotes.



 

I don't do effluvium from which you will run.

 

 

You have been running for weeks, Sir.

I am right here.  Your NEW spin is you were talking about the round.



You did not make that pin until know.  If the was the case you would have said so weeks ago.

Let me educate you on the rounds.  The military full metal jacket ammunition due to Rules of Land Warfare.  We are a signatory to that convention.  Now, that said, if you wish to ban that round, go ahead and fight for it. 

Most of use FMJ as range rounds.  To practice with because it is cheap.  Most of carry DEFENSE rounds that are much more powerful and devastating to your body.  According to the convention about hollow points, etc, they are banned.

So by all means, since you think you are the expert on this, ban FMJ.  Which is the round optimized for combat.

And no, that is not good enough to change my comment.  You had weeks to clarify and come up with that fluff.  You didn't

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:26 am

You have been running for weeks, Sir.


 

You've been answered REPEATEDLY.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:23 am

I don't do effluvium from which you will run.

Speaking of you running: 


1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:28 am

Speaking of running: 


you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 


Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 
 

It's time.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:27 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:26 am

You have been running for weeks, Sir.



 

You've been answered REPEATEDLY.

 

Sir, you have given one answer, sort of.  

So now you claim it is the road you were talking about.  I think you for wanting to ban FMJ range rounds and allow me token more powerful rounds.  I started a thread about.

Thank you sir.  You are dismissed.  

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:32 am

It's time.

I agree. Now answer. It's been over a month. 



1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:33 am

Sir, you have given one answer, 

Yes, that's how a man does it.
Thank you.
We're done here.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:36 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:33 am

Sir, you have given one answer, 

Yes, that's how a man does it.
Thank you.
We're done here.

 

 

Thank you for allowing me to keep my 9 mil ad the more powerful ammo..

You are my huckleberry, Sir.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:36 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:33 am

Sir, you have given one answer, 

Yes, that's how a man does it.
Thank you.
We're done here.

 

 

PS.  Sir, it does not take man over a month to come up with an excuse.  BUT, I will take you at your words. May I suggest before you make such proclamation you acutely do a little research into FMJ and rounds available to civilians?

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:35 am

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:32 am

LMAO!.  That is the record, VER **** BATIM!  With links and in context.

Where do I make reference to 9mm?

 

Sir, once again your spin is confusing...on that particular bay you imply you were not making reference to the 9mm.  But today you claim you are.  About a month later.

How strange.....

SIr, with respect and pity, I suggest you get your excuses straight.