Liberal Forum

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 11:23 am

Sir, once again your spin is confusing...on that particular bay you imply you were not making reference to the 9mm.  But today you claim you are.  About a month later.

How strange.....

SIr, with respect and pity, I suggest you get your excuses straight.

.on that particular bay you imply you were not making reference to the 9mm.  But today you claim you are

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 9:07 am

*Huey » 18 Jul 2025, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 8:42 am

Now you claim I didn’t lie.  You implied 9mil is a weapon designed for combat, just like the AR 15.

Now you claim I didn’t lie. You implied

No.

 

Huey » 18 Jul 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 9:15 am

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2025, 9:07 am

No.

Sure you did.

There is no doubt these are your words.  (This is how a man does it)


*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

I post about the 9 mil.  You say it "like the Colt Ar 15......."
 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:32 am

ANOTHER MASSIVE TINY THREADFAIL.

Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

no spam  »   no spam  » wrote:  no spam
no spam
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

no spam

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

liberalforum /viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:01 am

Um, Sir, I must point out your words are posted in full, with no edits, in context, with a link, and VERBATIM.  As a man would do it.  

Sir, you will point out the lie.

In the mean time you words indicate you think that the 9mm is not appropriate for civilian use.

Since you said like the AR 15 that means you want it banned.

I guess you are not an honorable man.

JohnnyYou » 11 Sep 2025, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2025, 1:08 pm

Gun talk is a massive subject?

JohnnyYou » 11 Sep 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Sep 2025, 1:09 pm

I am just glad they don't  sell nuclear bombs at Walmart...

When do you get your aircraft carrier?

There is a line somewhere  who gets what weapons.  You want none.