Liberal Forum

Vegas » 29 Jun 2025, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 7:56 pm

I noticed that he doesn't answer questions much either. Like BV, he prefers to throw 600 of them out without answering a single one himself.

what question have I thrown out?

besides this one

Ill wait   

this is funny coming from a guy that consistently copies and pastes the same replies over and over   

Mrkelly » 30 Jun 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:50 am

what question have I thrown out?

besides this one

Ill wait   

this is funny coming from a guy that consistently copies and pastes the same replies over and over   

 

Here's one:

Hey ****, do you agree 9 mm should not be allowed?

Asked yesterday.  

​​​​​​​

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:52 am

Here's one:

Hey ****, do you agree 9 mm should not be allowed?

Asked yesterday.  

 

  That’s not a question that I have “thrown out” 
​​​​​​​

Mrkelly » 30 Jun 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:54 am

  That’s not a question that I have “thrown out” 


 

You haven't answered it either.    

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:46 am

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.

The answer is

"You DON'T make reference to 9mm. I lied, again...I do that a lot."
 

Mrkelly » 30 Jun 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:54 am

  That’s not a question that I have “thrown out” 
 

With such strict rules about questions, and his steadfast refusal to answer any, I'm surprised Sheilagh hasn't pried the question mark from his keyboard...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:16 am

The answer is

"You DON'T make reference to 9mm. I lied, again...I do that a lot."
 

 

Try again ya lying flabby *** bastard:

Your words as linked above.  

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:18 am

Try again ya lying flabby *** bastard:

Your words as linked above.  

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

I see no mention of 9mm.


 

Mrkelly » 30 Jun 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:54 am

:LOL:  That’s not a question that I have “thrown out” 
​​​​​​​

You always throw out questions nobody will answer honestly defending their relative hypothetical lifestyle larger than time adapting since conceived.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:23 am

I see no mention of 9mm.


 

 

 

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

You are referring to the 9 MM with " like the Colt AR-15,...." Unless you want to tell me what like is referring to.  Or what "They" is referring to.  

Thanks for playing. 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:28 am

You are referring to the 9 MM with " like the Colt AR-15,...." Unless you want to tell me what like is referring to.  Or what "They" is referring to.  

Thanks for playing.

No, I'm  not.

I never mentioned 9mm.

You did.


You can't read.


 

ANOTHER MASSIVE TINY THREADFAIL.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:32 am

ANOTHER MASSIVE TINY THREADFAIL.

You are a person that failed to comprehend how you exist in plain sight equally inhabiting space by chromosomes not contextual ideology, daily here.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:30 am

No, I'm  not.

I never mentioned 9mm.

You did.


You can't read.


 

 

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  
 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:36 am

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.

You are interpreting.

I don't answer to your interpretations.

You can't read.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:47 am

You are interpreting.

I don't answer to your interpretations.

You can't read.
 

 

THere is no interpretation needed.  The question asked was about the 9 MM.

You answered 

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

If you were not referring to the 9 mm you would not have said "LIKE the Colt AR 15....".  You would have said "The Colt AR 15....".

Now there is a case.  You lied,  Admit it. 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:47 am

You are interpreting.

I don't answer to your interpretations.

You can't read.
 

You won't navigate actual life, in real time, either.

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 7:53 am

THere is no interpretation needed.  The question asked was about the 9 MM.

You answered 

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

If you were not referring to the 9 mm you would not have said "LIKE the Colt AR 15....".  You would have said "The Colt AR 15....".

Now there is a case.  You lied,  Admit it.

Post this "question".

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 8:06 am

Post this "question".

 

It is posted in the OP and has bee reposted numerous times. 

Just tell me what i s "Like the AR 15" and what they refers to when you say this:

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 8:08 am

It is posted 

Take the L...