Liberal Forum

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:21 am

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

What does  like the Colt AR-15 and they refer to?

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:21 am

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

What does  like the Colt AR-15 and they refer to?

Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

Mrkelly » 30 Jun 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 8:58 am

:LOL:  yet another long *** “I got nuthin “

you guys are funny  :LOL:  

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:25 am

Are these your words?


 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:27 am

Here's another lie..


 

 

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:28 am

These are your words in reference to a comment I made about 9 MM

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:27 am

You lied.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:34 am

Answer the question,  Runny

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:33 am

So you finally admit that it was YOU who referenced 9mm.

Post the pile of gibberish in which you do so...


 

 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:37 am

You first.

You are answering a question with a question.  Doesn't work that way.

What does  like the Colt AR-15 and they refer to?

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:39 am

As did you with this statement:
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

it refers to the subject, 9 MM.  Like is comparing the purpose of the weapon.  THEY is claiming BOTH.....

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:28 am

These are your words in reference to a comment I made about 9 MM

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:43 am

No, Idiot.

I make NO REFERENCE to 9mm.

It is YOUR diversion, attached to a lie.

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:42 am

You'll have to post that rule...

Are you referring to this gibberish?


 



 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:48 am

As did 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:48 am

As did you with this statement:

it refers to the subject, 9 MM.  Like is comparing the purpose of the weapon.  THEY is claiming BOTH.....

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:50 am

Show me 9mm as "the subject".

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:56 am

Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:49 am

Tiny,

Focus.