Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 9:58 am

That is you, again.

Post the title to that thread.

 

You have a question to answer. 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:01 am

You have a question to answer.

No.

You have a retraction, and numerous apologies, to offer.

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:00 am

I just answered another of your questions.  Your turn.

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

No, you didn't. 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:05 am

No.

You have a retraction, and numerous apologies, to offer.

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:10 am

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

Already answered.

You've confirmed receipt.

But I'll do so again......with your pledge that you will never bitch about "repeating" again.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:13 am

Already answered.

You've confirmed receipt.

But I'll do so again......with your pledge that you will never bitch about "repeating" again.
 

 

If you were talking ONLY about the AR 15 you would not have used the words you did.  How could YOU, of all people, be so grammatically incorrect? 

 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:18 am

If you were 

Stop interpreting.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:44 am

Stop interpreting.

 

Just answer the question:

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:48 am

Just answer the question:

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

Already answered. You've confirmed receipt. But I'll do so again......with your pledge that you will never bitch about "repeating" again.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:49 am

Already answered. You've confirmed receipt. But I'll do so again......with your pledge that you will never bitch about "repeating" again.

 

You answer was a lie.  You would have noy been using words to indicate both of them.  So yes, you want 9 MM banned from civilian use.
 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:53 am

You answer was a lie.  

You acknowledge that you've been answered.

Asserting it is easy...

So far, all you've demonstrated is that you're lying.

Take the pledge..

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:55 am

You acknowledge that you've been answered.

Asserting it is easy...

So far, all you've demonstrated is that you're lying.

Take the pledge..

 

 

Try again:

Just answer the question:

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

And no, you never answered that question.  This was one of the easiest lies of  yours to expose. 


*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

What they are your referring?  
 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 10:58 am

Try again:


 

You've made a liar of yourself, again.

You better just take the pledge...

Resolve the ambiguity. 

*Huey » 29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2025, 12:51 pm

No you didn't.  Here is what you were asked:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic.

You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch.  

BV claimed he was talking about NATO 5.56.  Lied his *** off than he PG'd the post with this info.  What a ****** move.  He ain't ****.

Dumb ****,

I said it in reference to the NATO 5.56.

viewtopic.php?p=2766018#p2766018

And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

we need to address these lies...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 11:00 am

You've made a liar of yourself, again.

You better just take the pledge...

Resolve the ambiguity. 

 

Try again:

Just answer the question:

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

And no, you never answered that question.  This was one of the easiest lies of  yours to expose. 


*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

What they are your referring?  

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 11:01 am

we need to address these lies...

 

Not until you expalin this:

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

Those are expressions that indicate more than one. 

*Huey » 30 Jun 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 11:10 am

Not until you expalin this:

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

Those are expressions that indicate more than one.

You better just take the pledge... Resolve the ambiguity. 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 11:13 am

You better just take the pledge... Resolve the ambiguity.

Guess I am going to start using PG again on this thread.    

Mrkelly » 30 Jun 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:50 am

what question have I thrown out?

besides this one

Ill wait   

this is funny coming from a guy that consistently copies and pastes the same replies over and over 

The one that Huey provided. Duh.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 11:13 am

You better just take the pledge... Resolve the ambiguity. 

 

In  your response to my 9mm comment when you say "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate" what are you referring to?

Those are expressions that indicate more than one.

Those are expressions that indicate more than one.

I am just curious.  If in fact when replying to my 9mm comment you talking ONLY about the Ar 156, why use "LIKE the AR 15",  "it was designed and optimized for combat", and " they are inappropriate".  You are indicating more than one firearm.

And know you lie about it.