Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 5:47 am

Ghetto's ex wife took up with her Hebrew divorce attorney and now the fruit of Ghetto's withered loins call him "Daddy" and sport yarmulkes...

I am laughing my *** off and don't even have the context in  Hebrewish yarlpullkitts.

Best Day BV.. I IM'd @Punch  ​​​​​@roadkill  they are prepubescent punk trolls for banning us from their thread.  PHOOK 'EM!

Looking forward to the three day weekend to celebrate freedom lost.  If I could declare independence from MAGA I would.  Texas can leave if it wants.  We keep or move all miltary out and there SSB's go directly into stimulus for the poor normal people in the Land of Non Lunacy...   I really think I should run for office, I could go policy wild better than Quite Frankly.
 
The Doom Azzes can't touch us...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo

 
 

jerrab » 30 Jun 2025, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:59 pm

and........................ when the civil rights act was passed........................

they all became.................................... 

REPUBICANS.

You mean 2 did. NONE of the other DHIMOCRAPS leaders became Republicans that you will find

That's all you will ever find and if you think otherwise, YOU'RE A **** IDIOT!!

Well, you are a **** IDIOT, so there's that.

jerrab » 30 Jun 2025, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:52 pm

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way ... his-voters
Former KKK Leader David Duke Says 'Of Course' Trump Voters Are His Voters///////

 former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, who supports Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, because Duke represents the way in which white supremacists attach themselves to Trump's campaign.Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke is running for U.S. Senate and tells NPR that he believes he'll be getting the votes of Donald Trump supporters.And he reiterated his own support for Trump, saying he's "100 percent behind" the Republican presidential candidate's agenda."As a United States senator, nobody will be more supportive of his legislative agenda, his Supreme Court agenda, than I will," Duke said.

So??

TRUMP doesn't support Duke and has SAID AS MUCH, DICKUPMYASS!!

JohnnyYou » 01 Jul 2025, 1:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 1:52 am

I don't know who controls your belief system..   It seems to be base hate to me.

The truth is hate to those who hate the truth      

*GHETTO BLASTER » 01 Jul 2025, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 7:52 am

The truth is hate to those who hate the truth     :)  

What truth is held by honoring reasonable doubt about how evolving actually happens every day each person rather die in character than survive by hearts beating in series parallel time displaced here now as specifically ancestrally positioned so far?

Eternally separated without exceeding adapting at the same time equally surviving one heart beat at a time with personal brains navigating exactly how they are behavior currently here.

It is a crying shame civilized means obedient to power of suggestion by those promising artificial tomorrows 7 days a week managing all 5 ancestral lineages' 5 generation gaps to believe nobody can know what tomorrow is defending relative time logistic projecting evolving dawn to dust defining tomorrow midnight to noon each rotation as noon to midnight is what is left today.

See dawn to dusk is left defined as yesterday factually when dawn to dusk is just the half of the planet rotating facing the sun at the core of the solar system per rotation of the planet dawn to dawn, revolving around the star every 365.2422 rotations every revolution as 3rd planet from the star life is perpetually balancing outcomes left alive now.

JohnnyYou » 01 Jul 2025, 1:50 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 1:50 am

You seem to never understand that political ideologies flip flopped in the Jim Crow Era.

I can use the same argument that Republicans have always been flaming liberals.

Democrats are as much KKK as much as Republicans are Buddhists..

That's the same tired excuse the left always uses.  You say things were different back then? No they weren't. The dems had to change their tactics but there goal is the same.  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Jul 2025, 12:14 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 12:14 am

There are plenty of Dems who mean well but their belief system is  the product of a JWO controlled public information system that includes TV, public schools and entertainment

Maybe some day they'll see the light...


 

JohnnyYou » 01 Jul 2025, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 6:00 am

I am laughing my *** off and don't even have the context in  Hebrewish yarlpullkitts.

Best Day BV.. I IM'd @Punch  ​​​​​@roadkill  they are prepubescent punk trolls for banning us from their thread.  PHOOK 'EM!

Looking forward to the three day weekend to celebrate freedom lost.  If I could declare independence from MAGA I would.  Texas can leave if it wants.  We keep or move all miltary out and there SSB's go directly into stimulus for the poor normal people in the Land of Non Lunacy...   I really think I should run for office, I could go policy wild better than Quite Frankly.
 
The Doom Azzes can't touch us...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo

What thread are you taking about you dunce?   lol   I can understand why someone would want to ban you but it wasn't me. I don't believe I have those powers.
 

roadkill » 01 Jul 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 9:22 am

That's the same tired excuse the left always uses.  You say things were different back then? No they weren't. The dems had to change their tactics but there goal is the same.

Yep, for over 50 years now!!

And this is coming from the #1 HATER of the CIVIL RIGHTS BILLS until he found a way to TWIST **** into getting BLACKS voting for DHIMOCRAPS!!!

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2016/07/ ... otes-2.jpg
 

*Beekeeper » 01 Jul 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 9:35 am

Yep, for over 50 years now!!

And this is coming from the #1 HATER of the CIVIL RIGHTS BILLS until he found a way to TWIST **** into getting BLACKS voting for DHIMOCRAPS!!!

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2016/07/ ... otes-2.jpg

And yet Johnny and Bv are still feeding at the same pig trough.   

roadkill » 01 Jul 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 10:18 am

And yet Johnny and Bv are still feeding at the same pig trough.

Yep. So is jerraB and a host of others too!!

*Beekeeper » 01 Jul 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 10:26 am

Yep. So is jerraB and a host of others too!!

I've come to a decision..."Off With Their Heads!"         

Vegas » 30 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 5:21 pm

The dims have always found ways to enslave blacks. Even after the civil war. During the reconstruction period, they required black people to sign yearly labor contracts; if they refused, they could be arrested for vagrancy and fined or forced into unpaid labor. They prohibited black people from renting or owning land in certain areas, and restricted their movement and ability to testify against whites. That list goes on and on to the present day.

Democrats prove they are out of touch...

"‘It’s stupid’: Americans ridicule Democrats’ multi-million-dollar study on men"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55Eid0dLAvs
 

jerrab » 30 Jun 2025, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 8:18 pm

--------------------------------------------------
Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Political Realignment:

• This shift, often referred to as the "Southern Strategy" or the "flip," was a major political realignment that fundamentally reshaped both parties.

I laugh every time this gets posted!

A little research will show it took 30 years for all those blue southern states to flip majority red.
 
Democrats had to come up with something to hide their racist past, idiots bought it!

roadkill » 01 Jul 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 9:33 am

What thread are you taking about you dunce?   lol   I can understand why someone would want to ban you but it wasn't me. I don't believe I have those powers.

It was this one..  I guess @Punch  didn't like getting punched with an prepubescent punk label. I no longer get the Ronjul Eyes...


viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96458

roadkill » 01 Jul 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 9:22 am

That's the same tired excuse the left always uses.  You say things were different back then? No they weren't. The dems had to change their tactics but there goal is the same.

Which party supports White Christian Nationalism today?

Fuelman » 01 Jul 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 11:04 am

I laugh every time this gets posted!

A little research will show it took 30 years for all those blue southern states to flip majority red.
 
Democrats had to come up with something to hide their racist past, idiots bought it!

show the research

Fuelman » 01 Jul 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 11:04 am

I laugh every time this gets posted!

A little research will show it took 30 years for all those blue southern states to flip majority red.
 
Democrats had to come up with something to hide their racist past, idiots bought it!

--------------------------------------------

Here's a breakdown:

• Civil Rights Act of 1964: This landmark legislation outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, including segregation in public places and employment.
• LBJ's Role: As a Democratic president, Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law, despite opposition from some members of his own party, particularly from the Southern states.
• Democratic Defection: The passage of the Civil Rights Act, championed by Johnson and supported by a majority of Republicans in Congress, led to a shift in the political landscape. Many white Southern Democrats, who opposed the federal government's intervention in civil rights, began to leave the Democratic Party and join the Republican Party.
• The "Southern Strategy": This shift is sometimes referred to as a component of the "Southern Strategy," in which the Republican Party appealed to white Southern voters who were disaffected with the Democratic Party's support for civil rights.
• Long-Term Impact: This resulted in a transformation of the South's political alignment, with many areas that were previously strongholds for the Democratic Party becoming reliably Republican. This contributed to the broader ideological shift within both parties, with the Democratic Party becoming more associated with liberalism and the Republican Party with conservatism. 

In short, President Johnson's signing of the Civil Rights Act, a defining moment in the Civil Rights Movement, played a significant role in the realignment of political allegiances in the South, leading some Democrats to join the Republican Party and contributing to the ideological divergence between the two major parties. 

•  
•  
•  

JohnnyYou » 01 Jul 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 11:08 am

Which party supports White Christian Nationalism today?

Why?  Yer question sounds like a campaign ad.   

Probably the party that supports Black Christian Nationalism today.    

Hey Johnny...got any other lame gotcha questions?      
 

jerrab » 01 Jul 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 11:13 am

show the research

You will learn more if you check it out for yourself.

The voting history of each of those Southern blue states after the civil rights movement pretty much proves the point.