Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 5:43 am

Elaborate on that, @*VegasVagina...

You first. I think it's finally time. 


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

jerrab » 30 Jun 2025, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 8:20 pm

your question has no factual basis.

You didn't know that the kkk went to the repubs after the civil rights act? That is basic history 101.

jerrab » 30 Jun 2025, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2025, 6:30 pm

how many kkk are democrats today?

how many are republicans?

I answered that and you continue to dance around my question. I have a rule with people who do that. If they don't answer my questions, then I am under no obligation to answer theirs. @Blackvegetable  knows this all too well. 


I'll remind you: Which party owns and controls the ghettos? 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 5:47 am

Ghetto's ex wife took up with her Hebrew divorce attorney and now the fruit of Ghetto's withered loins call him "Daddy" and sport yarmulkes...

"Daddy"?

Just because Trump is yer "Daddy" doesn't mean you can use my copyright for free.  Go Copyright something in yer own hood like "Pimp", or something.       
 



 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 01 Jul 2025, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 7:52 am

The truth is hate to those who hate the truth    

The left never got in the groove...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ITMm7mzmphw
 
 

Vegas » 01 Jul 2025, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 3:26 pm

I answered that and you continue to dance around my question. I have a rule with people who do that. If they don't answer my questions, then I am under no obligation to answer theirs. @Blackvegetable  knows this all too well. 

I'll remind you: Which party owns and controls the ghettos?

you have not given any facts.

what ghettos??

don't ask vague questions and expect answers this is what sol would do.


 

Vegas » 01 Jul 2025, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 3:22 pm

You didn't know that the kkk went to the repubs after the civil rights act? That is basic history 101.

yes they were like all pre civil rights democrats and went republican and still are today.

Fuelman » 01 Jul 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 1:12 pm

You will learn more if you check it out for yourself.

The voting history of each of those Southern blue states after the civil rights movement pretty much proves the point.

go ahead  and show it,

Fuelman » 01 Jul 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 1:12 pm

You will learn more if you check it out for yourself.

The voting history of each of those Southern blue states after the civil rights movement pretty much proves the point.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had a significant impact on voting rights in Georgia. While the Act primarily addressed discriminatory voting practices through provisions like Title I, the subsequent Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) provided stronger enforcement mechanisms and had a more direct impact on increasing Black voter registration and participation in the South, including Georgia. 
Key Impacts of the Civil Rights Act (and subsequent VRA):

• Prohibition of discriminatory voting practices: The Civil Rights Act outlawed the discriminatory voting practices adopted in many southern states after the Civil War, including literacy tests as a prerequisite to voting. The VRA specifically banned literacy and "understanding or interpretation" tests, a key driver in increasing Black voter registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

yep, go ahead and show how georgia voted in 1965.
 

jerrab » 01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm

you have not given any facts.

what ghettos??

don't ask vague questions and expect answers this is what sol would do.

@*VegasVagina is good with slogans...

Bad with math...
 

jerrab » 01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm

you have not given any facts.

what ghettos??

don't ask vague questions and expect answers this is what sol would do.

Another **** Vegas thread?

Surprising 

jerrab » 01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm

you have not given any facts.

what ghettos??

don't ask vague questions and expect answers this is what sol would do.

What ghettos? Come on, Jerra. Pick one. 

jerra b » 01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm

you have not given any facts.

what ghettos??

don't ask vague questions and expect answers this is what sol would do.


 

Why won't evolution theorists like creation theologists discuss how chromosomes flow through series parallel reproductions only exist in current ancestral lineages when adapting in space daily here each with a sole brain and heart evolved from their single fertilized cell containing their specific DNA conceived to decomposed corpse so far?

It is a timeless question about how 8.2 billion ancestors occupying space daily here divided between 5 ancestral lineages and 5 generation gaps hypothetical 24 hours a day 7 days a week never exceeding adapting as one of a kind now.

Vegas » 02 Jul 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 9:58 am

What ghettos? Come on, Jerra. Pick one.

you pick one.

 

Vegas » 02 Jul 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 9:58 am

What ghettos? Come on, Jerra. Pick one.

you are a carbon copy of sol


------------------------------------------------

Why won't evolution theorists like creation theologists discuss how chromosomes flow through series parallel reproductions only exist in current ancestral lineages when adapting in space daily here each with a sole brain and heart evolved from their single fertilized cell containing their specific DNA conceived to decomposed corpse so far?

It is a timeless question about how 8.2 billion ancestors occupying space daily here divided between 5 ancestral lineages and 5 generation gaps hypothetical 24 hours a day 7 days a week never exceeding adapting as one of a kind now.

jerrab » 02 Jul 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 10:28 am

you are a carbon copy of sol

 

Jerra. If you don't want to answer, then fine. I am used to that with @Blackvegetable  . But at least have the decency to admit that. 

Vegas » 02 Jul 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 10:30 am

Jerra. If you don't want to answer, then fine. I am used to that with @Blackvegetable  . But at least have the decency to admit that.

Where did you get the definition - in my words - of Survivorship bias?

jerra b » 02 Jul 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 10:28 am

you are a carbon copy of sol


------------------------------------------------

Why won't evolution theorists like creation theologists discuss how chromosomes flow through series parallel reproductions only exist in current ancestral lineages when adapting in space daily here each with a sole brain and heart evolved from their single fertilized cell containing their specific DNA conceived to decomposed corpse so far?

It is a timeless question about how 8.2 billion ancestors occupying space daily here divided between 5 ancestral lineages and 5 generation gaps hypothetical 24 hours a day 7 days a week never exceeding adapting as one of a kind now.

wow. great editing.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 10:31 am

Where did you get the definition - in my words - of Survivorship bias?

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 02 Jul 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 10:32 am

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered


 

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered