Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 01 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm

fuk off Fuk Stick
 

You have a lot in common with Murdock and most people serving greater good tomorrows.

MR-7 » 01 Jul 2025, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 2:23 pm

Have you run a business?

Yes

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 2:38 pm

Yes

without it being a franchise following corporate policies? Your answer makes my brain think you were only a manager of a specific store or district.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 2:38 pm

Yes

So, you were wholesale.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 6:43 am

Markets anticipate the Grifty **** in Q1. In early April, Grifty announces his plans to impose tariffs - triggering panic buying...then he postpones the tariffs until the start of July (beginning of the 3rd quarter) driving even more panic buying into Q2.

MAGA will then preach some drivel about how Grifty defied all predictions to create yugeness, as Q3 starts choking out...to FOX, this will restart the "recession count". But NBER doesn't play that..

However, NBER makes their calls in "hindsight"...it may take a year, or more, before the curtain gets pulled on this scam. Should the call not be made before midterms, the necessary congressional purge may not occur....and, by 2028, we'll look like England in 1978...

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

*Beekeeper » 01 Jul 2025, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 7:27 am

Dow Index
44,094.77
Change
+ 275.50 0.63% 

S&P 500 Index

6,204.95
Change
+ 31.88 0.52% 

NASDAQ Index
20,369.73
Change
+ 96.27 0.47% 

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/19397 ... 0236742050

https://x.com/townhallcom/status/193978 ... s-n2659713

"It's almost like the "experts" were wrong!"

The thread title indicates it's almost like the author is concerned that he'll get the wake up call...      



 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 8:53 am

I don't understand why people who don't answer questions insist that you answer ALL of theirs....

Fox News dominates Q2, beats broadcast networks in ratings

During the quarter, Fox News averaged 3.015 million viewers and 350,000 in the key 25-54 demographic, edging past ABC’s 2.977 million and NBC’s 2.704 million. The network also saw 1.8 million total-day viewers and 223,000 in the demo, marking its second-highest-rated second quarter ever, behind only 2020.

Programs like The Five remained standouts, continuing its run as the most-watched, non prime-time cable news show for 15 consecutive quarters with nearly 4 million viewers and a 52 percent year-over-year increase in the demo.
 
 
 

Vegas » 01 Jul 2025, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 3:26 pm

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

  there is the copy and paste that you post time and time again 

One of them that I was talking about   

Mrkelly » 01 Jul 2025, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 3:54 pm

  there is the copy and paste that you post time and time again 

One of them that I was talking about 

And he still hasn't answered.         

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 6:43 am

Markets anticipate the Grifty **** in Q1. In early April, Grifty announces his plans to impose tariffs - triggering panic buying...then he postpones the tariffs until the start of July (beginning of the 3rd quarter) driving even more panic buying into Q2.

MAGA will then preach some drivel about how Grifty defied all predictions to create yugeness, as Q3 starts choking out...to FOX, this will restart the "recession count". But NBER doesn't play that..

However, NBER makes their calls in "hindsight"...it may take a year, or more, before the curtain gets pulled on this scam. Should the call not be made before midterms, the necessary congressional purge may not occur....and, by 2028, we'll look like England in 1978...

Congrats go out to you


BV the Dairy Queer Dickhead has a severe form of TDS

He's had it since June 16th of 2015 when BV's President Donald Trump came down the golden escalator.

Wow...BV the Dairy Queer dickhead just had his TDS 10 Year Anniversary 

MR-7 » 01 Jul 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 10:39 am

@Blackvegetable  Make sure you show us those FACTS to refute this!

He can't. ALL he has is what his handlers BLEW UP HIS *** and none if addresses the reality and facts I posted.

He's doing what he does best when his *** get CURB STOMPED....

https://media.tenor.com/YebVIVDe700AAAA ... hiatus.gif

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm

Must be rocket science, then.
 

brown, don't be a **** idiot...
 

ROG62 » 01 Jul 2025, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 10:24 pm

brown, don't be a **** idiot...

Then answer, Cretin.

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2025, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 5:47 am

Then answer, Cretin.

viewtopic.php?p=2766764#p2766764
 
 

MR-7 » 02 Jul 2025, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 5:52 am

viewtopic.php?p=2766764#p2766764

You dumb piece of ****..

It's an ad.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2025, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2025, 6:43 am

Markets anticipate the Grifty **** in Q1. In early April, Grifty announces his plans to impose tariffs - triggering panic buying...then he postpones the tariffs until the start of July (beginning of the 3rd quarter) driving even more panic buying into Q2.

MAGA will then preach some drivel about how Grifty defied all predictions to create yugeness, as Q3 starts choking out...to FOX, this will restart the "recession count". But NBER doesn't play that..

However, NBER makes their calls in "hindsight"...it may take a year, or more, before the curtain gets pulled on this scam. Should the call not be made before midterms, the necessary congressional purge may not occur....and, by 2028, we'll look like England in 1978...

SEEK HELP FOR YOUR TDS ASSHOLE

Blackvegetabley t » 02 Jul 2025, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 6:10 am

You dumb piece of ****..

It's an ad.

Here's what you DON'T seem to want to include in all you hate filled ****!!!

The TARIFFS are working EXACTLY as planned and keeping AMERICAN JOBS in AMERICA instead of in FOREIGN COUNTRIE'S FACTORIES MAKING CARS!! Instead of looking at the Jap or German piece of ****, AMERICAN CARS are now the ones being looked at and BOUGHT!! That's how TARIFFS WORK, MORON ASSHOLE!!

So AMERICAN BUILT CAR SALES ARE RISING as the ones from FOREIGN COUNTRIES ARE DECLINING!! PERFECT way to keep AMERICAN JOBS BUILDING CARS!!!
 
Your boy DOOMBERG isn't going to tell you that since it DEFEATS THE NARRATIVE he wants his LEMMING MORONS to regurgitate!!

And it's NOT AN AD he linked to, ****!! It's actual FACTS you refuse to acknowledge.

*Beekeeper » 02 Jul 2025, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 7:06 am

Here's what you DON'T seem to want to include in all you hate filled ****!!!


 

You posted an ad, ya dumb ****.

 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jul 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 7:33 am

You posted an ad, ya dumb ****.

You call THIS....

In 2025, the number of small businesses in the United States is expected to continue growing, with a projected increase of 0.28% in the past year, according to SellersCommerce. This growth is part of a larger trend, with a total of 34,836,451 small businesses as of 2025, representing 99.9% of all businesses in the US. 
Key Trends and Factors:

• Continued Growth:
  Small businesses are anticipated to maintain their strong presence in the US economy, contributing significantly to GDP, employment, and exports, according to CAKE.com. 
• Economic Optimism:
  Many small business owners are optimistic about their financial prospects in 2025 and plan to grow their businesses, according to Goldman Sachs. 

An AD??

You're a **** MORONIC PIECE OF IDIOT ****, ASSHOLE!!

THOSE ARE CALLED FACTS FROM A SOURCE!!

*Beekeeper » 02 Jul 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2025, 7:38 am

You call THIS....

In 2025, the number of small businesses in the United States is expected to continue growing, with a projected increase of 0.28% in the past year, according to SellersCommerce. This growth is part of a larger trend, with a total of 34,836,451 small businesses as of 2025, representing 99.9% of all businesses in the US. 
Key Trends and Factors:

• Continued Growth:
  Small businesses are anticipated to maintain their strong presence in the US economy, contributing significantly to GDP, employment, and exports, according to CAKE.com. 
• Economic Optimism:
  Many small business owners are optimistic about their financial prospects in 2025 and plan to grow their businesses, according to Goldman Sachs. 

An AD??

You're a **** MORONIC PIECE OF IDIOT ****, ASSHOLE!!

THOSE ARE CALLED FACTS FROM A SOURCE!!

Yes, I do.

You're a **** *******. You ran to google, picked something that looked good to you, and made an *** of yourself.

IT'S AN AD SELLING PICKS&SHOVELS TO PROSPECTORS.


**** rube.