Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 07 Jul 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 1:40 pm

Lol. Yes,I take ideas seriously. It's why I post here. 

I am going to take it, then, that you have no particular objection to what GhettoBlaster is quoted in the OP as saying. You just want everyone to know that he has big lips, no regard for parental duties, and one or more bench warrants.

 If you think that it makes a good point …. Go with that 

I will stick with comparing world wide ratios of white folks to the numbers in America to be stupid 

or what the kids call a “red herring”

Mrkelly » 07 Jul 2025, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 5:36 pm

 If you think that it makes a good point …. Go with that 

I will stick with comparing world wide ratios of white folks to the numbers in America to be stupid 

or what the kids call a “red herring”

Yeah, I'm gonna go with that. 

I think to dismiss the great replacement argument out of hand, you must be wilfully blind. You have to WORK at it. 

Maybe you can explain the oceans' racism. Sea level has risen 8 CM (3 inches) in the past 30 years in France - but in Mauritania (nonwhite, victims, needing rehoming in white countries), it's more like 4.5 feet. Not inches - feet.  

Those three inches France suffered in 3 decades? Heck, that's just three YEARS' rise in the Maldives. And Bangladesh? A foot or more, in the same time France got 3 inches. Y'see, water DOESN'T find its level, in leftist science. In LEFTIST science, water is racist. EVERYTHING is racist. And the solution always involves erasure of the borders of majority white nations. 

EVERY WHITE NATION ON EARTH is being favored by the racist oceans. What are the **** odds?

When you can name ONE WHITE COUNTRY whose citizens are not being chided, threatened, tricked, bullied, or bribed to open their borders to veritable invasions by nonwhites, then and only then you get to smirk at those who suggest that (((someone))) is trying to replace whites in their sundry homelands. Considering that you can literally SEE IT HAPPENING; considering that it is impossible to hide, and so it is justified by appeals to liberalism and finger-wags against racism; you have to be pretty **** gay - possibly aggressively, man-raping gay - to just smirk it off with facile accusations of racism. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm

Yeah, I'm gonna go with that. 

I think to dismiss the great replacement argument out of hand, you must be wilfully blind. You have to WORK at it. 

Maybe you can explain the oceans' racism. Sea level has risen 8 CM (3 inches) in the past 30 years in France - but in Mauritania (nonwhite, victims, needing rehoming in white countries), it's more like 4.5 feet. Not inches - feet.  

Those three inches France suffered in 3 decades? Heck, that's just three YEARS' rise in the Maldives. And Bangladesh? A foot or more, in the same time France got 3 inches. Y'see, water DOESN'T find its level, in leftist science. In LEFTIST science, water is racist. EVERYTHING is racist. And the solution always involves erasure of the borders of majority white nations. 

EVERY WHITE NATION ON EARTH is being favored by the racist oceans. What are the **** odds?

When you can name ONE WHITE COUNTRY whose citizens are not being chided, threatened, tricked, bullied, or bribed to open their borders to veritable invasions by nonwhites, then and only then you get to smirk at those who suggest that (((someone))) is trying to replace whites in their sundry homelands. Considering that you can literally SEE IT HAPPENING; considering that it is impossible to hide, and so it is justified by appeals to liberalism and finger-wags against racism; you have to be pretty **** gay - possibly aggressively, man-raping gay - to just smirk it off with facile accusations of racism.

   
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm

When you can name ONE WHITE COUNTRY whose citizens are not being chided, threatened, tricked, bullied, or bribed to open their borders to veritable invasions by nonwhites, then and only then you get to smirk at those who suggest that (((someone))) is trying to replace whites in their sundry homelands. Considering that you can literally SEE IT HAPPENING; considering that it is impossible to hide, and so it is justified by appeals to liberalism and finger-wags against racism; you have to be pretty **** gay - possibly aggressively, man-raping gay - to just smirk it off with facile accusations of racism.

 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Jul 2025, 1:03 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 1:03 am

“You can’t VOTE out the [[[JWO]]] you moron”

That should be your battle cry going forward 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/will- ... ent-stream
 

Its almost like certain parasites are telling the Japanese to bring in more brown foreigners

 

Cannonpointer » 07 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm

Yeah, I'm gonna go with that. 

I think to dismiss the great replacement argument out of hand, you must be wilfully blind. You have to WORK at it. 

Maybe you can explain the oceans' racism. Sea level has risen 8 CM (3 inches) in the past 30 years in France - but in Mauritania (nonwhite, victims, needing rehoming in white countries), it's more like 4.5 feet. Not inches - feet.  

Those three inches France suffered in 3 decades? Heck, that's just three YEARS' rise in the Maldives. And Bangladesh? A foot or more, in the same time France got 3 inches. Y'see, water DOESN'T find its level, in leftist science. In LEFTIST science, water is racist. EVERYTHING is racist. And the solution always involves erasure of the borders of majority white nations. 

EVERY WHITE NATION ON EARTH is being favored by the racist oceans. What are the **** odds?

When you can name ONE WHITE COUNTRY whose citizens are not being chided, threatened, tricked, bullied, or bribed to open their borders to veritable invasions by nonwhites, then and only then you get to smirk at those who suggest that (((someone))) is trying to replace whites in their sundry homelands. Considering that you can literally SEE IT HAPPENING; considering that it is impossible to hide, and so it is justified by appeals to liberalism and finger-wags against racism; you have to be pretty **** gay - possibly aggressively, man-raping gay - to just smirk it off with facile accusations of racism.

I wondered about some of this, so I took a look

sea level has risen about the same around the world 

Maldives and bangladesh sit a couple of feet above sea level 

France sits around 375 meters above sea level 

I see why they are more effected by any rise

no report to be found of a racist ocean raising by “feet”
 
 

Mrkelly » 09 Jul 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 7:00 am

I wondered about some of this, so I took a look

sea level has risen about the same around the world 

Maldives and bangladesh sit a couple of feet above sea level 

France sits around 375 meters above sea level 

I see why they are more effected by any rise

no report to be found of a racist ocean raising by “feet”

You are spouting pure ****. I demand links. 

**** that - I'll PROVIDE links, you lying ***. 

Here's France, you lying ***:

https://www.google.com/search?q=How+muc ... e&ie=UTF-8
Sea levels in France have risen, and are projected to continue rising. Over the past century, the average ocean level has risen by 17 cm. However, the rate of rise has accelerated in recent decades, with an estimated 8.5 cm (3") rise since the 1990s. 

Here's Maldives, you lying ***:

https://www.google.com/search?q=How+muc ... s-wiz-serp
Sea level rise in the Maldives has been a concerning issue, with rates varying over time but generally showing an increasing trend. Since the 1950s, sea levels have risen at a rate of 0.03-0.06 inches (0.8-1.6 millimeters) per year. More recent data indicates a faster rate of rise, with some studies citing over 30mm per year between 2017 and 2020 >>>>>  30 mm per year = almost 1.2 inches ANNUALLY over the last three years - more than France has experienced in total since the 1990s. 

So the question becomes, WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING OCEANIC RACISM? Hitler, much???

In the time that France has seen THREE inches, Bangladesh has seen over TEN. [Edit: ,you lying ***]

https://www.google.com/search?q=How+muc ... s-wiz-serp
Bangladesh, a low-lying country in the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta known as the Bengal Delta, has experienced a 26.0 cm mean sea level shift at an average rate of 11.6 mm/year over the past two and a half decades.

Why are you DEFENDING Gaia's racism? Hitler? Is that it - Hitler? Be honest. Hitler, yes?

More importantly, why did you feel the need (and show the poor judgment) to lie that you had debunked my thesis, without bothering to provide a link? Were you ashamed of your source? Was your source Hitler? You can tell me if your source was Hitler. I'm a fan. 

 
 

Cannonpointer » 09 Jul 2025, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 8:16 pm

You are spouting pure ****. I demand links. 

**** that - I'll PROVIDE links, you lying ***.

 
Are sea levels rising the same all over the world, as if we're filling a giant bathtub?

No. Sea level rise is uneven, the two main reasons being ocean dynamics and Earth’s uneven gravity field. First, ocean dynamics is the redistribution of mass due to currents driven by wind, heating, evaporation and precipitation. For example, during La Niña events, sea level goes down because some rain that usually occurs over the ocean shifts to land, and the same phenomenon produces low latitude currents that redistribute seawater. Regional climate cycles, like El Niño and La Niña, and longer-term effects, like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, change ocean circulation, which changes sea level.A visualization of Earth’s gravity field using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data. Gravity is determined by mass; Earth’s mass is not distributed equally, and it also changes over time. Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Texas Center for Space Research

Second, because the distribution of Earth’s mass is uneven, Earth’s gravity is also uneven. Therefore, the ocean’s surface isn’t actually a perfect sphere or ellipsoid; it is a bumpy surface. As the land-based ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica continue to unload their mass (lose ice) from far above sea level and far from the tropics, that mass reaches the sea in the form of meltwater that is then redistributed along Earth’s gravity field.The areas farthest from the melted ice will see the most sea level rise as a result. Conversely, areas nearest to Greenland and Antarctica will see the least amount of sea level rise (and some areas will actually see sea levels drop). Scientists even track the annual cycle of ice sheet mass losses to further refine their sea level rise measurements.Between 1993 and 2018, sea level rose 12 to 15 millimeters per year (about half an inch per year) in some regions, and went down by that amount in others. But on average, it has gone up by about 3 millimeters per year(about 28 millimeters, or 1-1/8 inches, per decade) in that same period. Most of this unevenness is caused by ocean dynamics.

https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/9/are-sea ... t-bathtub/ 

 
 

Mrkelly » 09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm

 
Are sea levels rising the same all over the world, as if we're filling a giant bathtub?

No. Sea level rise is uneven,

Tell that to the lying *** who said this ****:

Mrkelly » 09 Jul 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 7:00 am

I wondered about some of this, so I took a look

sea level has risen about the same around the world

Everytime I argue with a climate cultist, I am arguing with no fewer than three mother ****.

One **** insists that "sea level has risen about the same around the world". The other mother **** says no, I disagree with that mother **** - sea level DOES differ radically from one place to the next, and there's a scientitious reason for it. The third mother **** will explain away the dancing sea level by arguing localized subduction - blithely ignoring that this explanation blasphemously contradicts the climate change explanation for sea level rise. And all THREE of these mother **** will refuse to explain the racism of water.

Pick ONE of these mother ****, please, and agree to argue THAT mother ****'s poisition. Is that too much to ax? Watching you call yourself a liar from one post to the next is exhausting, and it leaves me feeling like I'm butting in on your argument if I respond to one of you.

 
 

Mrkelly » 09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm

 But on average,

"On average" meaning a wee bit in white countries and a gorilla-sized ***-bucket in the of-colored world.

Mrkelly » 09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm

it has gone up by about 3 millimeters per year(about 28 millimeters, or 1-1/8 inches, per decade) in that same period. Most of this unevenness is caused by ocean dynamics.

https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/9/are-sea ... t-bathtub/

Okay,

Please explain why "ocean dynamics" are racist.
 
Fun fact: The Mississippi Delta has seen WAY above average "sea level rise" due to subduction. So why aren't we shipping some *** overseas? What's wrong with OUR ***? 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 09 Jul 2025, 10:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 10:49 pm

Fun fact: The Mississippi Delta has seen WAY above average "sea level rise" due to subduction. So why aren't we shipping some *** overseas? What's wrong with OUR ***?

Excellent point Cannonpointer...very racist, but none the less, very true. Oh, have a nice day Fruity.   
 

Cannonpointer » 09 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 10:25 pm

Tell that to the lying *** who said this ****:

Everytime I argue with a climate cultist, I am arguing with no fewer than three mother ****.

One **** insists that "sea level has risen about the same around the world". The other mother **** says no, I disagree with that mother **** - sea level DOES differ radically from one place to the next, and there's a scientitious reason for it. The third mother **** will explain away the dancing sea level by arguing localized subduction - blithely ignoring that this explanation blasphemously contradicts the climate change explanation for sea level rise. And all THREE of these mother **** will refuse to explain the racism of water.

Pick ONE of these mother ****, please, and agree to argue THAT mother ****'s poisition. Is that too much to ax? Watching you call yourself a liar from one post to the next is exhausting, and it leaves me feeling like I'm butting in on your argument if I respond to one of you.

I’ll stick with the guy that said “sea level has risen about the same around the world”

And not the one that said that the difference can be measured in feet 

hint … that would be you 

Mrkelly » 10 Jul 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 6:50 am

Mrkelly » 09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 8:39 pm

 
Are sea levels rising the same all over the world, as if we're filling a giant bathtub?

No. Sea level rise is uneven,

I’ll stick with the guy that said “sea level has risen about the same around the world”

Stop hitting yourself!  
 

Cannonpointer » 07 Jul 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 1:40 pm

Lol. Yes,I take ideas seriously. It's why I post here. 

I am going to take it, then, that you have no particular objection to what GhettoBlaster is quoted in the OP as saying. You just want everyone to know that he has big lips, no regard for parental duties, and one or more bench warrants.

not that I am prejudiced or anything but it is a lot easier for a black artist than a white artist to get a  start.
 

jerrab » 10 Jul 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 2:51 pm

not that I am prejudiced or anything but it is a lot easier for a black artist than a white artist to get a  start.

What a prejudiced and racist remark you little **** racist. 
 

jerrab » 10 Jul 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 2:51 pm

not that I am prejudiced or anything but it is a lot easier for a black artist than a white artist to get a  start.   

 The good old ”Im not a racist… but” 

a classic if there ever was one

why not just make your statement without a disclaimer?

Mrkelly » 10 Jul 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 4:27 pm

 The good old ”Im not a racist… but” 

a classic if there ever was one

why not just make your statement without a disclaimer?

much respect....  
 

jerrab » 10 Jul 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 2:51 pm

not that I am prejudiced or anything but it is a lot easier for a black artist than a white artist to get a  start.

The jewish establishment sees to that. We are one nation under the star of david. 
 

Mrkelly » 10 Jul 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 6:50 am

And not the one that said that the difference can be measured in feet 

hint … that would be you

Trust the science. 

posting.php?mode=quote&f=3&p=2770062#page-bodyNASA has observed the earth getting warmer and the sea level getting higher.What's the connection?
 Just like mercury in a thermometer, water expands when it's heated. And Earth's ocean is taking in more than 90% of the heat from global warming. That's a lot.Warmer temperatures also cause a lot of the ice to melt, and it ends up in the ocean.
 A child born today can expect the ocean to rise between 1 and 4 feet in their lifetime. In the United States alone, nearly 5 million people live within 4 feet of the local high tide level. That could mean increased flooding from storm surges. And as the ocean rises, its salt water can mix with our rivers and ground water, which is where many people get fresh water for drinking and farming. So there's no question that sea level is rising. NASA can measure it from space.But what are we going to do about it?
 Some communities are taking steps to adapt and others are working to address the cause: global warming. It's a big challenge, but, hey, we better be up for it. Because, right now, good old Earth is the only planet we've got!Credit

Cannonpointer » 10 Jul 2025, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2025, 5:44 pm

Trust the science. 

posting.php?mode=quote&f=3&p=2770062#page-bodyNASA has observed the earth getting warmer and the sea level getting higher.What's the connection?
 Just like mercury in a thermometer, water expands when it's heated. And Earth's ocean is taking in more than 90% of the heat from global warming. That's a lot.Warmer temperatures also cause a lot of the ice to melt, and it ends up in the ocean.
 A child born today can expect the ocean to rise between 1 and 4 feet in their lifetime. In the United States alone, nearly 5 million people live within 4 feet of the local high tide level. That could mean increased flooding from storm surges. And as the ocean rises, its salt water can mix with our rivers and ground water, which is where many people get fresh water for drinking and farming. So there's no question that sea level is rising. NASA can measure it from space.But what are we going to do about it?
 Some communities are taking steps to adapt and others are working to address the cause: global warming. It's a big challenge, but, hey, we better be up for it. Because, right now, good old Earth is the only planet we've got!Credit

  so when you said

“Maybe you can explain the oceans' racism. Sea level has risen 8 CM (3 inches) in the past 30 years in France - but in Mauritania (nonwhite, victims, needing rehoming in white countries), it's more like 4.5 feet. Not inches - feet. “

you meant “they will in their lifetimes “

my bad, I missed that part