Liberal Forum

nefarious101 » 05 Jul 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2025, 9:00 am

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/ ... ommission/

I....MAKING AMERICA BEAUTIFUL AGAIN

II...EXPANDING ACCESS TO PUBLIC LANDS

III..CONSERVING AMERICAN TREASURES

yes and cut down trees and kill all the birds and animals who have the nerve to live on the lands plus kill all the trees.

jerrab » 06 Jul 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 2:28 pm

yes and cut down trees and kill all the birds and animals who have the nerve to live on the lands plus kill all the trees.

you spend a lot of time fantasizing and predicting that you finally win don't you?

at least you try to stand your ground and not run away like Dribbles does

 

nefarious101 » 06 Jul 2025, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:18 pm

you spend a lot of time fantasizing and predicting that you finally win don't you?

at least you try to stand your ground and not run away like Dribbles does

actually anyone can go into public lands  but that will be stopped soon.


have fun killing all the birds and animals and trees.

jerrab » 06 Jul 2025, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:24 pm

actually anyone can go into public lands  but that will be stopped soon.

have fun killing all the birds and animals and trees.

more fantasizing.....like other pedo=progressives you have no self-control....kind of like an animal

Cannonpointer » 06 Jul 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 2:28 pm

The earth's atmosphere held FIVE TIMES as much C02 when trees evolved photosynthesis. It is currently critically low on C02 - and the people saying otherwise are either duped rubes, or they arte "in on it." If you wonder what they are "in on," google, "Georgia Guide Stones."

If you wonder just how critically low the earth's atmospheric C02 is, simply take note that more than half of America's vegetables spend some or all of their lives in greenhouses being fed extra C02. 

Science. It's not handed out by the talking heads on teevee, rube goldberg. Having a sense of what's what requires EFFORT, you free loading, **** mouthing, empty headed son of a bitch. 

As I understand it,  Earth had maintained less than 400 ppm CO2 for 800,000 years. Bubbles in Ice and tree rings provide evidence, there is other data..  Only a fool cannot see the correlation between the Industrial Revolution and breaking 400 PPM in 2010.  

We are at 428 ppm today.

20 lbs of CO2 for every 6.8 lbs of Gasoline Combusted.  When I last tried to calculate it.. Anthropogenic scources of CO2 were 10% of the total sources.

Approximately 376 million gallons of gasoline are combusted per day in the United States. Globally, this figure is likely significantly higher, with the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reporting a record-breaking 26.9 million barrels of gasoline consumption per day in 2023, which translates to roughly 1.13 billion gallons. 

https://www.co2.earth/daily-co2

Damn.. The AI God phooked up the math!!

AI Overview

No, the concentration of CO2 in Earth's atmosphere was not under 400 ppm for the last 800,000 years. Ice core data shows that CO2 levels fluctuated between about 170 ppm and 280 ppm during that period, according to the World Economic Forum. The recent rise above 400 ppm is a relatively recent phenomenon, primarily caused by the burning of fossil fuels during the industrial era, according to The World Economic Forum and Yale e360

Approximately 376 million gallons of gasoline are combusted per day in the United States. Globally, this figure is likely significantly higher, with the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reporting a record-breaking 26.9 million barrels of gasoline consumption per day in 2023, which translates to roughly 1.13 billion gallons. 

The US alone  put 22.6 Billion pounds of CO2 from our vehcles in 2023. 11,300,000 tons. 11.3 GTons Per phooking Day!..

Annual volcanic eruptions emit significantly less CO2 than human activities. 

• Global volcanic CO2 emissions (including eruptions and non-erupting sources): are estimated to be between 280 to 360 million tonnes (0.28 to 0.36 Gt) per year.
• Human-caused CO2 emissions: are 40 to 100 times greater than the total volcanic emissions.
• The 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption: released approximately 10 million tons of CO2 in 9 hours, but humanity can emit the same amount in just 2.5 hours. 

Cross checking the above claim

AI Overview
Burning 6.8 lbs of gasoline produces approximately 20.06 lbs of CO2. This is because gasoline is primarily composed of carbon and hydrogen, and when burned, these elements combine with oxygen from the air to form carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). The weight of the CO2 produced is greater than the original weight of the gasoline due to the added weight of the oxygen. 
 
 

I did take a course in Atmospheric Chemistry in College. I was taught how R22 was poison to our climate and Al Gore was right.
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm

As I understand it,  Earth had maintained less than 400 ppm CO2 for 800,000 years. Bubbles in Ice and tree rings provide evidence, there is other data..  Only a fool cannot see the correlation between the Industrial Revolution and breaking 400 PPM in 2010.  

600,000 - which is a **** blip. You sciencetards cannot have it both ways. You cannot golly-gee-whiz the math one minute and talk about billions of years the next. It's reminiscent of how everything which looks good for your narrative is climate and everything that looks bad for your narrative is weather.

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm

We are at 428 ppm today.

Critically low.

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm

20 lbs of CO2 for every 6.8 lbs of Gasoline Combusted.  When I last tried to calculate it.. Anthropogenic scources of CO2 were 10% of the total sources.

C02 trails warming. The real science is in. Warm climactic periods are FOLLOWED by rising C02 - not preceeded. Try to get a bit of real knowledge. C02 cannot be at cause in the global warming scam that you stupidly believe in.

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm

Approximately 376 million gallons of gasoline are combusted per day

Just gonna mercy kill the rest of that.

You have no comprehension of the size OR FUNCTION of the system that you are dithering about. C02 is LITERALLY - not figuratively, but LITERALLY - plant food. The more of it you release into the wild, the more plant life you will get. Whole new carbon sinks will come into existence, if we release (or a volcano reases) enough C02 to sustain it.

As greenhouse gasses go, C02 is anemic. Water vapor is the big kahuna. And there isn't **** all that humans have to do with water vapor.

Cannonpointer » 06 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm

Just gonna mercy kill the rest of that.

More CO2, more infrared radiation absorption.   

Yeah, just kill the math.  It hurts peoples brains. In the olden days they did math with words.  I am sorry but most of yours sound like meth..

I have been trying to find what the thermal absorpotion cooeficients are for constituents of the atmosphere. I am capable of calculating the thermal masses etc.

I am 2 degree C er. I have seen the average global temperature increase 2 deg C in my lifetime.  I anticipate seeing 2 more deg C within the next twenty years. Show me the last group of humans that have ever seen anything like that.  Of course getting a global average temp is kind of a new measurement..  I need Data.. Not CP's word for it.

I saw 103 for the first time on the old fashioned bulb thermometer on the porch for the first time last year.  I'll be sure to share the 104 with ya.

Stay Cool Dude..  Refrigeration is not a bad industry to be in right now.

 
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm

More CO2, more infrared radiation absorption.

No. Your entire narrative has been utterly debunked. C02 is not a greenhouse gas of any note. To begin with, it is in such small concentrations it has to be measured in parts per MILLION - not per hundred, or even per thousand. In the second place, it is not a freckle on the *** of water vapor or methane. methane is less than TWO parts per million, and it rivals C02 at around 400. But neither touches water vapor - the real driver of trapping heat. Not that heat is a bad thing - that's the other element that you clowns are missing.

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm

Yeah, just kill the math.

OMG you thought that confused gibberrish was math?

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm

I have been trying to find what the thermal absorpotion cooeficients are for constituents of the atmosphere. I am capable of calculating the thermal masses etc.

Yeah? Sounds almost like you are capable of thinking. But I am confident you will prove me wrong directly...

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm

I am 2 degree C er. I have seen the average global temperature increaase 2 deg C in my lifetime.  I anticipate seeing 2 more deg C within the next twenty years.

And there it is.

What was the average temperature of the earth on your birfday, pray tell?
What was the margin of error in that measurement - and how did you determine that margin?

What is the average temperature of the earth today, pray tell?
What is the margin of error in that measurement - and how did you determine that margin?

You silly girls and your high dudgeon narratives - you'll just never, ever learn when to shut the **** up and leave us wondering whether you are idiots.
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 3:45 pm

HEY CHECK OUT THESE BAD *** AA / FUEL ALTEREDS...MAGA!!!  THUNDER IN THE PIPES...!!!  TURN UP THE SOUND...!!!

 

https://youtu.be/qikn-ryMVJU?si=RXkLeEvdZLifxBe5

 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 4:32 pm

600,000 - which is a **** blip. .

Like Elon!

*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm

 

I have seen better rat races..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viqJlVY2eM8

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:23 pm

Like Elon!

Elon is a blip?

Um, okay?

And this rescues your lamne-*** thesis becaaaause...?

Give us the **** margin of error, sciencey guy. 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Jul 2025, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:25 pm

Elon is a blip?

Um, okay?

And this rescues your lamne-*** thesis becaaaause...?

Give us the **** margin of error, sciencey guy.

Hold on.. I am on another thread with Gut Master...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viqJlVY2eM8

I'm back..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBWO5qryzOI

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:27 pm

Hold on.. I am on another thread with Gut Master...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viqJlVY2eM8

Margin of error, internet meme - six of one, abject failure of the other. 

You REALLY shouldn't run you ignorant pie pit about science, child. I get the MSNBC produces some SPARKLING narratives, but there isn't any there, there. 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm

Margin of error, internet meme - six of one, abject failure of the other. 

You REALLY shouldn't run you ignorant pie pit about science, child. I get the MSNBC produces some SPARKLING narratives, but there isn't any there, there.

It came to me this weekend..  Are we missing two musketeers?

Because it sure seems like it is now all for one and none for all..

mehh..  where the phook is teacher?   I need sumptin' 'bout pyramids and fried babblefish. The horse manufacturer has gone metric..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkzeeEU27Mw
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 7:12 pm

More CO2, more infrared radiation absorption.   

Yeah, just kill the math.  It hurts peoples brains. In the olden days they did math with words.  I am sorry but most of yours sound like meth..

I have been trying to find what the thermal absorpotion cooeficients are for constituents of the atmosphere. I am capable of calculating the thermal masses etc.

I am 2 degree C er. I have seen the average global temperature increase 2 deg C in my lifetime.  I anticipate seeing 2 more deg C within the next twenty years. Show me the last group of humans that have ever seen anything like that.  Of course getting a global average temp is kind of a new measurement..  I need Data.. Not CP's word for it.

I saw 103 for the first time on the old fashioned bulb thermometer on the porch for the first time last year.  I'll be sure to share the 104 with ya.

Stay Cool Dude..  Refrigeration is not a bad industry to be in right now.

temperature is not and never has been static..what is the norm? no one knows...

There was five times as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during dinosaur years and fifteen times as much when terrestrial life began, because oceans remove CO2 from the atmosphere and tie it up as calcium carbonate and limestone. Now, all life is on the verge of extinction due to a shortage of CO2 needed for photosynthesis. Greenhouse operators add three to five times as much CO2 to the air to improve plant growth. 

One molecule in 2,500 rounds to zero.* Trapping heat in the atmosphere is an impossibility. There is no significant radiation for carbon dioxide to absorb, because it only absorbs long wave radiation and only cold substances, such as the surface of the Earth, emit long wave radiation. Cold substances emit almost no radiation for carbon dioxide to absorb.

*Biochemical reactions are not a rounding process; heating is.
 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm

 

Looks like something from the Munsters....
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm

 

Is that 1/8 or 1/4 mile?