Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Jul 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 9:59 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/us/p ... rmers.html

Kansans created Food for Peace, for 70 years a font of rural income and pride. Now at least one grain broker is trying to sell grain that once fed the world as dog food....

The Trump administration said the programs were inefficient and wasteful, “with dubious results.” It was the latest blow to farmers, particularly in Kansas, where about 80 percent of those on the high plains voted for Mr. Trump and agriculture makes up almost half of the state’s economy. The president’s whipsawing tariffs and cuts to agriculture grants and global food aid have left the state with swollen silos, shrinking markets and volatile prices for crops.....

Wheat prices have fallen by nearly $1.50 per bushel since February, well below the price farmers need to break even. “I would lay a huge amount of that right at the feet of Donald J. Trump,” Mr. Ehmke said.

Mr. Ehmke is a registered Republican, and says that for a Kansas farmer, “changing how you vote is, honest to God, like changing your religion.” But America’s farm sector is already shrinking, and he says Mr. Trump’s moves are bringing that bleak future to pass “a hell of a lot quicker. So I am pissed at him.”..

Mr. Marshall echoed Mr. Musk’s claims that U.S.A.I.D. was rife with “waste, fraud and abuse” and said that “we were sending food over to these foreign countries and corrupt governments and criminals and warlords were stealing it.” The crowd jeered.

 Mr. Marshall’s answer incensed Mrs. Ehmke. “Show me the data, Roger Marshall, about waste, fraud, abuse and warlords,” she said. “This is my living at stake here. What is your plan?”

Clearly Mrs Ehmke doesn't get it.....it's not about facts, it's about slogans.

There is always ACRE Trader..   JD Vance will list your property on the global investment market when you have to foreclose and your family will get dimes on the dollar.

Enjoy The Hate And Discontent.  They are the latest vogue American Qualities. Make America Glad Again 2026..

https://youtu.be/E3r6H9ghsSg?si=-nrg8x_mFLwir8H4

 
 

JohnnyYou » 07 Jul 2025, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 7:04 pm

There is always ACRE Trader..   JD Vance will list your property on the global investment market when you have to foreclose and your family will get dimes on the dollar.

Enjoy The Hate And Discontent.  They are the latest vogue American Qualities. Make America Glad Again 2026..

https://youtu.be/E3r6H9ghsSg?si=-nrg8x_mFLwir8H4

Excellent timing 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jul 2025, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 7:05 pm

Excellent timing

Grifts are like clockwork.  We gotta turn the dials back.

14700 Gigatons of Carbon Dioxide a Year from combustion of 1.5 Trillion Liquid Gallons of Hydrocarbons by humans

1 Gigaton From Volcanoes.  2 From Forest Fires.  I need someone to vet the calculation I have done twice on this rag. Once for CP (He mercy killed it).. Once for ROG (crickets)

ROG's was more concise and it freaked me out. Please I need someone to tell me i missed some orderes of magnitude. Hopefully AI is wrong on the fire and volcano sources. I am pretty sure I got E12,9's,and 6's right.

Maybe Liquified Natural Gas is in the equation.. That may be some relief.. But nahhh...

 
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jul 2025, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 6:43 pm

No need...I've defined it.

You can't. 

Because you're a low grade moron.

And your definition is incomplete and vague...like you. If you want proof that all answers fit your definition, but only one is correct, then you need to answer. Otherwise, you don't get ****. 

Vegas » 07 Jul 2025, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jul 2025, 8:40 pm

And your definition is incomplete and vague

You would have no reason to know....

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 8:55 am

You would have no reason to know....

Allow me to prove it. Answer, so I can nuke you. Coward.

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 10:15 am

Allow me to prove it. 

Start here

He was using a fallacy that is called "survivorship bias." Now, I don't expect people to know offhand what that means. However, given how much Veghead brags that he has superior aptitude in stats...and math in general, there was no need for me to define the fallacy. He should already know since it's a common term in stats. So, what did he think it meant? He took it literally and thought it meant dead presidents. LOL! The bolded quote at the end proves how intellectually superior he is. 
  I am left with no choice, but to publicly embarrass him. 
  @Blackvegetable I will never let you live this gem down. 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:24 am

Start here

Oh look. The narcissists turning it on me again, so he doesn't have to answer. How unlike him. 

Oh look, the narcissist copy/pasting me again, thereby proving he has no thoughts of his own. 

QED.

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:37 am

Oh look. The narcissists turning it on me again, 

You haven't done **** yet..

I've defined the term, in my own words.

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:39 am

You haven't done **** yet..

I've defined the term, in my own words.

Again? Jesus Christ, dude. We already went through that. Not even 10 **** minutes ago.

THEN USE IT TO ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@Deezer Shoove  I promise, this will be the only time I do this. Please give me a pass for this. It won't happen again. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:42 am

Again? Jesus Christ, dude. We already went through that.

and yet you're still pissing and moaning.

 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:42 am

Again? Jesus Christ, dude. We already went through that. Not even 10 **** minutes ago.

THEN USE IT TO ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@Deezer Shoove  I promise, this will be the only time I do this. Please give me a pass for this. It won't happen again. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

  He is insufferable.  

I do not think he possesses the ability to feel shame.
No matter how shameful his phony genius persona tries...
It would be like asking a garden slug to not be slimy. He'd ask "What's slime?"
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:53 am

and yet you're still pissing and moaning.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors