Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am

OK, third round at this calculation. Yes I was off by an order of magnitude yesterday.  I had 14700 gigatons

Humanity burns 1.47 trillion gallons of liquid hydrocarbons a year. That's 181 gallons each for 8.1 Billion souls.  It sounds a reasonable number.

A gallon of gasoline weighs 6.8 lbs. When combusted 20 lbs of CO2 is produced,

1.47 trillion gal/yr*20 lbs co2/gal = 29.4 trillion pounds of CO2/yr. -13.3 Gigatons

Volcanoes make 1 GT a year on an active year. Forest Fires make 2 GT a year.

Anyone who denies anthropogenic effects on climate is a fool. There would be no Oxygen in the air if photosynthesis by plant life hadn't  occured. Humans are changing the balance. We crossed 400 PPM CO2 in the atmosphere in 2010 after Mother Nature had it regulated to under that for 800,000 years. Today we are at 430 ppm and climbing, we increased 30ppm in 15 years. CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, more of it in the air, more heat absorption. The industrial revolution coincided with the increased slope.

Drill Baby Drill Burn Baby Burn is going to fry this planet like an egg on drugs in a pan for our descendants.

I don't always stay cool. But when I do math helps.

Then go live naked in the woods.  Without that fuel yer a goner.

roadkill » 08 Jul 2025, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 7:53 pm

Then go live naked in the woods.  Without that fuel yer a goner.

MAGAmethics!  Are you Betsy Devos boat between her legs?   

killer road lives


https://youtu.be/pdz5kCaCRFM?si=Lphj7qo7fFB10AmA

Phook Science

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDuZqYeNiOA

ROG62 » 08 Jul 2025, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 6:37 pm

I love real science...you know, natural immunity, male and female, we're still emerging from the ice age...it's the pseudoscience you and jerritol crave that I can't get behind...

LOL

https://youtu.be/MH3UpIJPnnc?si=vaCw-rGDrx0sHMut

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 7:13 pm

No James Brown?

Yeaahhoww?

On My Azz

https://youtu.be/MqRLzoyw0bo?si=dC4Gz180-jk_2OmZ

no jb...just pure unadulterated science...
 

ROG62 » 08 Jul 2025, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 8:50 pm

no jb...just pure unadulterated science...

beyond both of our neural networks capability

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z9DwMKvqcc

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am

OK, third round at this calculation. Yes I was off by an order of magnitude yesterday.  I had 14700 gigatons

Humanity burns 1.47 trillion gallons of liquid hydrocarbons a year. That's 181 gallons each for 8.1 Billion souls.  It sounds a reasonable number.

A gallon of gasoline weighs 6.8 lbs. When combusted 20 lbs of CO2 is produced,

1.47 trillion gal/yr*20 lbs co2/gal = 29.4 trillion pounds of CO2/yr. -13.3 Gigatons

Volcanoes make 1 GT a year on an active year. Forest Fires make 2 GT a year.

Anyone who denies anthropogenic effects on climate is a fool. There would be no Oxygen in the air if photosynthesis by plant life hadn't  occured. Humans are changing the balance. We crossed 400 PPM CO2 in the atmosphere in 2010 after Mother Nature had it regulated to under that for 800,000 years. Today we are at 430 ppm and climbing, we increased 30ppm in 15 years. CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, more of it in the air, more heat absorption. The industrial revolution coincided with the increased slope.

Drill Baby Drill Burn Baby Burn is going to fry this planet like an egg on drugs in a pan for our descendants.

I don't always stay cool. But when I do math helps.

You are a fool.....???
Now do your self a favor and calculate how much CO2 is absorbed by the entirety of Earth's Trees, Plants and Fauna .....and then expelling oxygen.....

and while you are at it .....Calculate how much global oxygen rates increase.......
you are being lied too......


​​​​​​


​​​​
 

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 6:29 pm

The Trump  Hammer on science is zero Evangelical 

You hate science.  It does  not align with your "Chistian" values

johnny thinks he's someone to rely on for facts..... 
Johnny thinks MAGA murdered Officer Sicknick [even after that claim was totally debunked years ago].  

Johnny  is also  the bat **** crazy  clown who thinks ****** lag behind the other races intellectually because....

1] for "millennia"  teams of evil White Men have invaded the jungle floor of Sub Saharan Africa, then rounded up and captured millions of Jungle Savages,

2/ then gave them all IQ tests,

3] then murdered just the ones that tested high while allowing only the stupid ones to live.

 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Jul 2025, 11:49 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 11:49 pm

johnny thinks he's someone to rely on for facts..... 
Johnny thinks MAGA murdered Officer Sicknick [even after that claim was totally debunked years ago].  

Johnny  is also  the bat **** crazy  clown who thinks ****** lag behind the other races intellectually because....

1] for "millennia"  teams of evil White Men have invaded the jungle floor of Sub Saharan Africa, then rounded up and captured millions of Jungle Savages,

2/ then gave them all IQ tests,

3] then murdered just the ones that tested high while allowing only the stupid ones to live.

 

And you love the J6 Unsurewrexshunists.. You think they are "Good People". Honestly anyone who believes anything you say is a godamned dumb azz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoaTV7rd1LQ

Majik » 08 Jul 2025, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 9:37 pm

You are a fool.....???
Now do your self a favor and calculate how much CO2 is absorbed by the entirety of Earth's Trees, Plants and Fauna .....and then expelling oxygen.....

and while you are at it .....Calculate how much global oxygen rates increase.......
you are being lied too......

​​​​​​

​​​​

Give me a billion dollars and I will

Or you can just read the graph to know the balance is out of whack. You are fooling yourself and you can't believe it.. You're killing yourself because you think you need it.


 
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2025, 4:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 4:31 am

And you love the J6 Unsurewrexshunists.. You think they are "Good People". Honestly anyone who believes anything you say is a godamned dumb azz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoaTV7rd1LQ

pencil neck schiff needs to be hung upside down from a lamppost by tribunal in D.C. square...
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2025, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 4:42 am

Give me a billion dollars and I will

Or you can just read the graph to know the balance is out of whack. You are fooling yourself and you can't believe it.. You're killing yourself because you think you need it.

post the historical norms for the last 4 billion years...

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am

OK, third round at this calculation. Yes I was off by an order of magnitude yesterday.  I had 14700 gigatons

Humanity burns 1.47 trillion gallons of liquid hydrocarbons a year. That's 181 gallons each for 8.1 Billion souls.  It sounds a reasonable number.

A gallon of gasoline weighs 6.8 lbs. When combusted 20 lbs of CO2 is produced,

1.47 trillion gal/yr*20 lbs co2/gal = 29.4 trillion pounds of CO2/yr. -13.3 Gigatons

Volcanoes make 1 GT a year on an active year. Forest Fires make 2 GT a year.

Anyone who denies anthropogenic effects on climate is a fool. There would be no Oxygen in the air if photosynthesis by plant life hadn't  occured. Humans are changing the balance. We crossed 400 PPM CO2 in the atmosphere in 2010 after Mother Nature had it regulated to under that for 800,000 years. Today we are at 430 ppm and climbing, we increased 30ppm in 15 years. CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, more of it in the air, more heat absorption. The industrial revolution coincided with the increased slope.

Drill Baby Drill Burn Baby Burn is going to fry this planet like an egg on drugs in a pan for our descendants.

I don't always stay cool. But when I do math helps.

You looking for a new job?

Refrigeration contributes to global warming through two primary channels: electricity consumption and refrigerant leakage. Refrigerants, particularly older types like CFCs, can trap significantly more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, contributing to the greenhouse effect. Additionally, the energy required to power refrigerators, especially in commercial settings, can account for a substantial portion of overall emissions. Here's a more detailed breakdown:1. Refrigerants:Refrigerants, like CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) and HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons), are used in refrigerators and air conditioning systems to cool. Many older refrigerants, particularly CFCs, have high global warming potentials (GWPs). This means they can trap significantly more heat than carbon dioxide. Even newer refrigerants like HFCs, while not depleting the ozone layer, still have a considerable GWP and contribute to global warming. Leakage of refrigerants from equipment contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, with some studies suggesting that a small amount of refrigerant can have the same impact as tons of CO2. 2. Electricity Consumption:Refrigerators, especially those used commercially, consume significant amounts of electricity. If the electricity used to power these refrigerators is generated from fossil fuels, it contributes to carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases. Even with renewable energy sources, the embodied energy in the manufacturing and disposal of refrigerators adds to the overall climate impact. 3. Impact and Mitigation:Refrigeration, including air conditioning, is estimated to be responsible for around 10% of global CO2 emissions. This impact is comparable to the emissions from the aviation and shipping industries combined. Efforts to mitigate the climate impact of refrigeration include:Phasing out older, high-GWP refrigerants like CFCs and transitioning to lower-GWP alternatives. Improving the energy efficiency of refrigerators and air conditioning systems. Promoting the use of renewable energy sources to power cooling equipment. Implementing regulations and policies to control refrigerant leaks and promote sustainable practices. In conclusion, refrigeration's contribution to global warming is significant, stemming from both the direct impact of refrigerants and the indirect impact of electricity consumption. However, ongoing efforts to develop and adopt more sustainable technologies and practices are crucial for mitigating these impacts. 
 

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 5:25 am

OK, third round at this calculation. Yes I was off by an order of magnitude yesterday.  I had 14700 gigatons

Humanity burns 1.47 trillion gallons of liquid hydrocarbons a year. That's 181 gallons each for 8.1 Billion souls.  It sounds a reasonable number.

A gallon of gasoline weighs 6.8 lbs. When combusted 20 lbs of CO2 is produced,

1.47 trillion gal/yr*20 lbs co2/gal = 29.4 trillion pounds of CO2/yr. -13.3 Gigatons

Volcanoes make 1 GT a year on an active year. Forest Fires make 2 GT a year.

Anyone who denies anthropogenic effects on climate is a fool. There would be no Oxygen in the air if photosynthesis by plant life hadn't  occured. Humans are changing the balance. We crossed 400 PPM CO2 in the atmosphere in 2010 after Mother Nature had it regulated to under that for 800,000 years. Today we are at 430 ppm and climbing, we increased 30ppm in 15 years. CO2 absorbs infrared radiation, more of it in the air, more heat absorption. The industrial revolution coincided with the increased slope.

Drill Baby Drill Burn Baby Burn is going to fry this planet like an egg on drugs in a pan for our descendants.

I don't always stay cool. But when I do math helps.

I got news for you...

CO₂  is produced by EVERY LIVING thing on the FACE of the earth..   CO₂  naturally flows in and out of the land, ocean and through living things as part of the carbon cycle. Land based plants and phytoplankton in the oceans take in CO₂ in a process called photosynthesis. Soils also store, cycle and emit carbon as part of the carbon cycle. About 30 per cent of the excess CO₂ added to the atmosphere is absorbed by oceans, where the CO₂ is dissolved.  In total, Earth's oceans, land and plants absorb 190.2 billion tonnes of CO₂ per year from the atmosphere.

Of ALL the things people should be "WORRIED" about... CO₂ is WAY down on the list !!
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2025, 4:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 4:31 am

And you love the J6 Unsurewrexshunists.. You think they are "Good People". Honestly anyone who believes anything you say is a godamned dumb azz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoaTV7rd1LQ

Still waiting for you to......

prove your totally ridiculous claim that MAGA murdered Officer Sicknick.................  

explain how an unarmed  MAGA could have dragged Pence past 100s of well armed Federal Agents to a pick up truck that was parked 1/2 mile away, off campus so that MAGA could hang him.

show video of 140 Capitol Cops injured so badly they needed to be carted off on stretchers, given emergency on the scene life support, laying in pools of their own blood, knocked the **** out, etc.

So far all you've been able to come up with is nothing but your usual GAY HYSTERICS.....  
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2025, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 4:42 am

Give me a billion dollars and I will

Or you can just read the graph to know the balance is out of whack. You are fooling yourself and you can't believe it.. You're killing yourself because you think you need it.

here is my proof you have been Lied too............

 There has been no significant increase in atmospheric oxygen levels in the last 75 years. In fact, oxygen levels have remained relatively stable, fluctuating around 21% of the atmosphere, for a very long time. While there have been periods of significant increases and decreases in oxygen levels throughout Earth's history, the last 75 years haven't seen any major shifts. 

Now if there has been no significant increases in oxygen over the last 75 years ......there cannot be a Climate crisis Occurring at all.....
because science says so......
due too the chemical relationship of Co2 in the oxygen making  process  of respiration ........which without ......humanity would go extinct.....

 
 

Majik » 09 Jul 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 3:28 pm

here is my proof you have been Lied too............

 There has been no significant increase in atmospheric oxygen levels in the last 75 years. In fact, oxygen levels have remained relatively stable, fluctuating around 21% of the atmosphere, for a very long time. While there have been periods of significant increases and decreases in oxygen levels throughout Earth's history, the last 75 years haven't seen any major shifts. 

Now if there has been no significant increases in oxygen over the last 75 years ......there cannot be a Climate crisis Occurring at all.....
because science says so......
due too the chemical relationship of Co2 in the oxygen making  process  of respiration ........which without ......humanity would go extinct.....

Do you understand gas pressure and how our planets gravity holds the atmosphere to it?  There is a limit.  The excess blows off if the jar gets full. I saw it on Wilipedia...

I won't disagree plants like higher ppm CO2.   I have noticed changes in the growth of corn in the 25 years I have been watching it grow here.   She's loving it. Yes the carbon sink fights back and the plants grow to eat up the excess.. It worked perfectly for 800,000 years and CO2 was under 400 ppm until 2010.

So no change in the ppm of oxygen..   4% CO2 is lethal to us.  PV=nRT and all that jazz..  I know how to do it but I was a 20 year old party maniac in college last time I did it. Oxygen is 21000 ppm of the atmosphere.  Varying that has a lot of stuff to consider behind it.  

I remember being fully taught the coal and oil would be gone by 2025 in elementary school.  No one foresaw fracking the gas out of the underworld. The graph above (if you can read one) is a pretty strong argument for anthopogenic sources.
 
And we haven't even touched the methane cycle yet. Farts Count!
 
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2025, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 5:26 pm

Do you understand gas pressure and how our planets gravity holds the atmosphere to it?  There is a limit.  The excess blows off if the jar gets full. I saw it on Wilipedia...

I won't disagree plants like higher ppm CO2.   I have noticed changes in the growth of corn in the 25 years I have been watching it grow here.   She's loving it. Yes the carbon sink fights back and the plants grow to eat up the excess.. It worked perfectly for 800,000 years and CO2 was under 400 ppm until 2010.

So no change in the ppm of oxygen..   4% CO2 is lethal to us.  PV=nRT and all that jazz..  I know how to do it but I was a 20 year old party maniac in college last time I did it. Oxygen is 21000 ppm of the atmosphere.  Varying that has a lot of stuff to consider behind it.  

I remember being fully taught the coal and oil would be gone by 2025 in elementary school.  No one foresaw fracking the gas out of the underworld. The graph above (if you can read one) is a pretty strong argument for anthopogenic sources.
 
And we haven't even touched the methane cycle yet. Farts Count!

You are so CO2 indoctrinated that you have forgotten that science is governed by rules....
Rules that make a mockery of your post.......
 

Majik » 12 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm

You are so CO2 indoctrinated that you have forgotten that science is governed by rules....
Rules that make a mockery of your post.......

Hey Majik. Good to see you back. 

Majik » 12 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm

You are so CO2 indoctrinated that you have forgotten that science is governed by rules....
Rules that make a mockery of your post.......

Care to share yours? Mine have a Nuclear Engineering Degree behind them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqLCWkFZCMo

I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides. Your Crystal Ballz look bruised.

https://i.postimg.cc/CLLPdsgt/The-Secret.png