Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 7:39 pm

I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides. 

https://i.postimg.cc/CLLPdsgt/The-Secret.png

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?
 

 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jul 2025, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 7:50 pm

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?

So what is the fast Nwettran Absorption Cross Section of Plutonium 241?


If you even know the UOM I will be impressed.

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 7:58 pm

So what is the fast Nwettran Absorption Cross Section of Plutonium 241?

If you even know the UOM I will be impressed.

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?       
 

JohnnyYou » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
20 minutes ago
I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides. 

Even AI knows what a Nwetran is..

AI Overview
The fast neutron absorption cross-section of Plutonium-241 is not explicitly stated in the provided search results, but it is known to be greater than that of Plutonium-239. Specifically, the neutron absorption cross-section of Pu-241 is about one-third greater than that of Pu-239. While the exact value for fast neutrons isn't given, it's implied that it's in the range of barns, with most absorption reactions leading to fission.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Fissile Material:
.
Plutonium-241 is a fissile isotope, meaning it readily undergoes fission when it absorbs a neutron.
Neutron Absorption:
.
It's more likely to absorb a neutron than even-numbered isotopes of plutonium and more likely to fission upon neutron absorption.
Fast Fission:
.
While fast neutrons have a reduced interaction probability compared to thermal neutrons, fast fission is still possible and is used in some fast neutron reactors.
Comparison to Pu-239:
.
The neutron absorption cross-section of Pu-241 is about 1/3 greater than that of Pu-239, according to Wikipedia and chemeurope.com.
Fission Probability:
.
About 73% of neutron absorptions in Pu-241 result in fission, while the rest lead to radiative capture (producing Plutonium-242).

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 8:01 pm

Even AI knows what a Nwetran is..

AI Overview
The fast neutron absorption cross-section of Plutonium-241 is not explicitly stated in the provided search results, but it is known to be greater than that of Plutonium-239. Specifically, the neutron absorption cross-section of Pu-241 is about one-third greater than that of Pu-239. While the exact value for fast neutrons isn't given, it's implied that it's in the range of barns, with most absorption reactions leading to fission.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Fissile Material:
.
Plutonium-241 is a fissile isotope, meaning it readily undergoes fission when it absorbs a neutron.
Neutron Absorption:
.
It's more likely to absorb a neutron than even-numbered isotopes of plutonium and more likely to fission upon neutron absorption.
Fast Fission:
.
While fast neutrons have a reduced interaction probability compared to thermal neutrons, fast fission is still possible and is used in some fast neutron reactors.
Comparison to Pu-239:
.
The neutron absorption cross-section of Pu-241 is about 1/3 greater than that of Pu-239, according to Wikipedia and chemeurope.com.
Fission Probability:
.
About 73% of neutron absorptions in Pu-241 result in fission, while the rest lead to radiative capture (producing Plutonium-242).

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?        

JohnnyYou » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
20 minutes ago
I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides. 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jul 2025, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 8:03 pm

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?        

JohnnyYou » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
20 minutes ago
I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides.

Blue circle on the right.. Cf is 1010 Barns.  Compare it to  239 and THINK!

https://i.postimg.cc/CLLPdsgt/The-Secret.png

What is the half life of Plutonium 241? Is 239's longer?  By how much?

241 is BackPack Nuke baseball sized.  14.5 year half life is super duper expensivo.


Think about how much money we spend arming for your Evangelistic End of Days.

So @GHETTO BLASTER   care tto share your Dora the Explorer adventure on the Chart of Nuclides?

There is a ton of crap in there.
 

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 8:05 pm

Blue circle on the right.. Cf is 1010 Barns.  Compare it to  239 and THINK!

https://i.postimg.cc/CLLPdsgt/The-Secret.png

What is the half life of Plutonium 241? Is 239's longer?  By how much?

241 is BackPack Nuke baseball sized.  14.5 year half life is super duper expensivo.

Think about how much money we spend arming for your Evangelistic End of Days.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
6 minutes ago
Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?        

JohnnyYou » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
20 minutes ago
I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides.
 

I am witnessing two educated idiots arguing over manifested details in context interpreting content both never accept their actual time lived so far since personal location in this atmosphere was established separated when conceived by separate ancestral lineages limited to eternally separately every rotation alive after birth always trying to control the outcome of life never same details twice since inception of their own ancestral lineages so far..

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 7:39 pm

Care to share yours? Mine have a Nuclear Engineering Degree behind them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqLCWkFZCMo

I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides. Your Crystal Ballz look bruised.

https://i.postimg.cc/CLLPdsgt/The-Secret.png

what is the relationship between Co2 and o2.......???????
Genius.........
 

*31stArrival » 13 Jul 2025, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 6:17 am

I am witnessing two educated idiots arguing over manifested details in context interpreting content both never accept their actual time lived so far since personal location in this atmosphere was established separated when conceived by separate ancestral lineages limited to eternally separately every rotation alive after birth always trying to control the outcome of life never same details twice since inception of their own ancestral lineages so far..

What do you have against me pointing out facts............

 

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 8:05 pm

Blue circle on the right.. Cf is 1010 Barns.  Compare it to  239 and THINK!

https://i.postimg.cc/CLLPdsgt/The-Secret.png

What is the half life of Plutonium 241? Is 239's longer?  By how much?

241 is BackPack Nuke baseball sized.  14.5 year half life is super duper expensivo.

Think about how much money we spend arming for your Evangelistic End of Days.

Where did you get your degree again........
Hahahaha.........
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jul 2025, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 7:50 pm

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?
 

 

ROG62 » 13 Jul 2025, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 8:26 pm

what's even more ridiculous is how much effort poor johnny put into trying to worm his way out of that lie......  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Jul 2025, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 8:29 pm

what's even more ridiculous is how much effort poor johnny put into trying to worm his way out of that lie......

brown's prodigy...  
 

JohnnyYou » 12 Jul 2025, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 8:10 pm

So @GHETTO BLASTER   care tto share your Dora the Explorer adventure on the Chart of Nuclides?

There is a ton of crap in there.

Did you REALLY  just say that knowing how to read the chart of nuclides is a SECRET...?        

JohnnyYou » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
20 minutes ago
I do know a few secrets. Like how to read The Chart of Nuclides. 
 

Majik » 13 Jul 2025, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 7:47 pm

What do you have against me pointing out facts............

 

the facts you point out defy how evolving actually genetically exists daily here. Evolving is an ongoing process each\periodic element universal combination plus each reproduction is experiencing occupying space in series parallel time adapting in time individually unique as defined by chromosomes, not context and social consensus of what people choose to believe possible tomorrow.

the singularity of eternally separated so far. That doesn't fit into 24/7 possibilities life isn't self evident time adapting per heartbeat and brain navigating specifically here now.

Minds obey reasonable doubt cradle to grave regardless the ancestor was just conceived, just born, just became 1 of 2 parents, 1 of 4 grandparents, 1 of 8 great grandparents, 1 of 16 great great whatever rotation of the planet those events occurred, occurring, haven't happened yet.

This atmosphere is home to 8.2 billion sole replacements relative to specific generation gaps, ancestral lineages(race) within a species developed geographically since inception of life beyond periodic elements combined and eroded apart like chromosomes conceived and decompose after dead.

I discuss universal constant changes never duplicating passed results now. That is all I am saying is humanity has corrupted every ancestor believing life exceeds series parallel time developing between fertilized cell and decomposed corpse by the moment here.

Simple correct and inaccurate ways to discuss actual time alive. Reality doesn't honor actual time evolving since personally added to one's ancestral lineage. It honors people ignoring all they been since conception by honoring who they become in character on the world of staged by context social outcomes after birth.

the so called original sin. Never admitting all one is since evolving began their time alive now.

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2025, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2025, 5:26 pm

 Oxygen is 21000 ppm of the atmosphere.  Varying that has a lot of stuff to consider behind it.  

I remember being fully taught the coal and oil would be gone by 2025 in elementary school.  No one foresaw fracking the gas out of the underworld. The graph above (if you can read one) is a pretty strong argument for anthopogenic sources.
 
And we haven't even touched the methane cycle yet. Farts Count!

The approximate ratio of oxygen (O2) to carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth's atmosphere is 525:1 by volume, or 20.95% O2 to 0.04% CO2. This means for every molecule of CO2, there are roughly 525 molecules of O2. By mole fraction, the atmosphere is approximately 78.08% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, and 0.04% carbon dioxide. 
Are you catching on yet?
​​Or are you always this slow .....?????


 

*31stArrival » 14 Jul 2025, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2025, 7:09 am

the facts you point out defy how evolving actually genetically exists daily here. Evolving is an ongoing process each\periodic element universal combination plus each reproduction is experiencing occupying space in series parallel time adapting in time individually unique as defined by chromosomes, not context and social consensus of what people choose to believe possible tomorrow.

the singularity of eternally separated so far. That doesn't fit into 24/7 possibilities life isn't self evident time adapting per heartbeat and brain navigating specifically here now.

Minds obey reasonable doubt cradle to grave regardless the ancestor was just conceived, just born, just became 1 of 2 parents, 1 of 4 grandparents, 1 of 8 great grandparents, 1 of 16 great great whatever rotation of the planet those events occurred, occurring, haven't happened yet.

This atmosphere is home to 8.2 billion sole replacements relative to specific generation gaps, ancestral lineages(race) within a species developed geographically since inception of life beyond periodic elements combined and eroded apart like chromosomes conceived and decompose after dead.

I discuss universal constant changes never duplicating passed results now. That is all I am saying is humanity has corrupted every ancestor believing life exceeds series parallel time developing between fertilized cell and decomposed corpse by the moment here.

Simple correct and inaccurate ways to discuss actual time alive. Reality doesn't honor actual time evolving since personally added to one's ancestral lineage. It honors people ignoring all they been since conception by honoring who they become in character on the world of staged by context social outcomes after birth.

the so called original sin. Never admitting all one is since evolving began their time alive now.

Ethics doesn't work unless those you are in conflict with recognize those ethics........
So, quit being a Turing machine and ad something of REAL substance........
So...Why do you want to decrease our oxygen levels ....¿??????????
Via your climate indoctrination .......????
 
 

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 6:18 am

The norm has been well under 400 ppm for 800,000 years.

And it was well over that for 800 million. What's your **** point?

JohnnyYou » 08 Jul 2025, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2025, 6:18 am

Bubbles trapped in ice have confirmed it.

Bubbles is Michael Jackson's monkey, you twerp.