Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 11 Jul 2025, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:33 am

I didn't read any of it once I saw who the "source" is. I mean, U of all people know the "The source matters". U said so.

His personal rules don't apply to others. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm

 

Oh, so we missed something here!!

Are you having a really bad day now??

*Huey » 11 Jul 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 2:18 pm

His personal rules don't apply to others.

@Blackvegetable  

Vegas » 11 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm

STFU with this noise. You will do absolutley anything, and I mean anything, to evade. Tough ****, coward. This isn't going anywhere. You insist that you know what it is, so I am holding you accountable.

I've provided you the definition, in my own words...

You insist that you know what it is, so I am holding you accountable.

And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm

I've provided you the definition, in my own words...

And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.

And he did it again. His stupidity is unparalleled. We already went through this about 600k times you dumb mother ****. 
Do you seriously not remember? 

1. Your definition is vague. All answers meet your definition, but there is only one right answer.
2. If you believe in your definition, then use it to answer. 

How many god damn times....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:19 am

How Netanyahu Prolonged the War in Gaza to Stay in Power

Through interviews with more than 110 officials in Israel, the United States and across the Arab world, as well as a review of dozens of government records and other documents, we reveal how Netanyahu’s actions first made Israel more vulnerable to the October disaster and then helped to prolong and expand the ensuing war. Unexpectedly, the war’s expansion allowed Israel to defeat Hezbollah and bruise Iran. But its extension in Gaza brought relentless misery for Palestinians, led to the deaths of Israeli hostages and allowed Netanyahu to defer a political reckoning.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/maga ... aways.html

why does it take so **** long for people to recognize The Obvious?

Having spent much of his time in office appeasing hard liners to stay there, Bibi was on the verge of being nailed for corruption...then Hamas threw him a life line.

His response to Oct. 7th has been largely self serving, and as he spent the political currency, opinion in Israel shifted....

But you can always rally global Hawks and their dimwit minions against Iran....it's an easy sell to slack jaws, FOX demographic wind socks and other cretins. 

The Kumbaya Krowd is on board the minute you start talking "penetration" and "bunker buster"....

So Netanyahu wages war with Iran - enabled by The Big Dunce...whose participation is a Yuge Success, regardless of any actual damage assessment - or you are spitting on Sgt. York and America.

Let a steady breeze stoke the fire of the bolgia wherein those two yutzes spend eternity riding a rotisserie...

I have to say this sudden position taking is refreshing. This isn't just cheap and patently homosexual sniping from the bushes. This is calling out the pink team - even if it's the lavender team doing the outcalling. I see you had permission for this opinion from the New York Times. Which signals to me that Bibi's time has come, and Trump is no more going to save Bibi than he will Bolsonaro (whom I like, naturally - but that gets him no free coffee). 

Yes, the right is queer as folk for pounding Iran. The cartoons inside their empty heads - though very badly drawn - are quite effective in erasing their humanity. 
 

*Beekeeper » 11 Jul 2025, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:22 am

It appears that no one really cares about your claim without ANY real evidence it's true.

Where are the names and the actual interviews of these so called "110 officials"?? Either it's invented or your NY Slimes are liars. I suspect both are at play here.

Hitchen's Razon aptly applies here.

Sometimes the medium is the message, sonny. 

But you would never understand that.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:28 am

As Netanyahu convalesced in his pajamas in the hospital in July 2023, a senior general brought him a troubling intelligence assessment. The report warned that Israel’s enemies, including Hamas, had taken note of the country’s domestic turmoil, set off by Netanyahu’s divisive plan to weaken the judiciary, and were preparing an attack.

Netanyahu ignored this and other warnings, and his government went ahead with the overhaul, passing a law hours later that limited the judiciary’s power, setting off more unrest. Two days later, Hamas’s leaders once again noted the turmoil in Israel — and decided the time was right to proceed with a long-planned attack.

Minutes after the attack began in October 2023, at the nadir of his political career, Netanyahu was already planting the seeds for his personal survival act. “I don’t see anything in the intelligence,” Netanyahu said in one of his first phone calls that day. It was his first deflection of blame and an early hint of how Netanyahu would try to prolong his political life by blaming the security and intelligence chiefs for failing to prevent the attack

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/maga ... aways.html

I believe that, in the main, Hawks SUCK at "defending Heimat"

The intelligence services of every nation around israel - nations we are instructed by faux and other MSM garbage heaps to view as teeth-gnashingly dedicated to the death of every jew on earth - was warning israel something big was in the works. And Bibi, to his credit, paid attention. He removed the troops that would be responsible to respond to this action to more distant locations. This allowed the carnage to be greater, the outrage to be greater. 

He also invoked the Hannibal Directive, and the number of israelis that died from jewish bullets was likely greater than those who died at the hands of Hamas. 

You cane easily spot the jewish bullets, as a small piece of led is nicked from each. Every time the IDF fires 37 bullets, they get enough led by this method to make one bullet for free. Sounds petty as hillary,. but It all adds up. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 9:28 pm

The intelligence services of every nation around israel - nations we are instructed by faux and other MSM garbage heaps to view as teeth-gnashingly dedicated to the death of every jew on earth - was warning israel something big was in the works. And Bibi, to his credit, paid attention. He removed the troops that would be responsible to respond to this action to more distant locations. This allowed the carnage to be greater, the outrage to be greater. 

He also invoked the Hannibal Directive, and the number of israelis that died from jewish bullets was likely greater than those who died at the hands of Hamas. 

You cane easily spot the jewish bullets, as a small piece of led is nicked from each. Every time the IDF fires 37 bullets, they get enough led by this method to make one bullet for free. Sounds petty as hillary,. but It all adds up.

Great post. Sadly, you are talking to the forum ****. You know as well as I do that he doesn't have the intellectual capacity to read past the first 5 words of this. He will strikethrough it all, call you a **** moron, then ask 6 million questions. 
 

MR-7 » 11 Jul 2025, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:33 am

I didn't read any of it once I saw who the "source" is. I mean, U of all people know the "The source matters". U said so.

For you, the source kills the story. But if you had keener understanding of your world, the source would BE the story.

It doesn't make a **** whether the story is "true" - and it is, in spades, and the whole **** world knows it except for you western bubble bois. What MATTERS is the very thing you are complaining about: WHO IS SAYING IT.

It's one thing if this story is running in Rolling Stone, Daily Kos, Huffpo,Democracy Now!, The Nation, The New Republic, etc. But the jew york times - very freindly to israel - is widely considered america's newspaper of record. When it decides to "go after" someone, it means the water is chummed. It means that person's powerful friends have decided to look the other way - wink and nod time has chimed. And if nothing else, this fact should register with you. A bell has been rung, and the tone of that bell is outside your aural perception - and that really ought to concern you. But I strongly doubt that it will.

The source being the new york times is not the problem with the story. It IS the story. 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:56 am

Read it again.

The presumptions are staggering...  

MR-7 » 11 Jul 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 7:12 am

Oh, no one is running Mary. I will not answer any of your request/questions...till you have answered the one question I have asked you MANY, MANY, and I mean MANY times that you refuse to answer. You are obviously SCARED of the question. But here it is again.

Name one, just one (out of the many, many, cable network news stations), that has EVER been in the number one position for, oh let's say, the last TWENTY years. Here is a hint BITCH...Google is your friend.

If he can answer it with google, it is a rhetorical question. That's the kind of **** questions HE asks. 

No one is obligated to answer rhetorical questions. I tell him that fairly regularly. Now I'm telling you that. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 9:28 pm

The intelligence services of every nation around israel - nations we are instructed by faux and other MSM garbage heaps to view as teeth-gnashingly dedicated to the death of every jew on earth - was warning israel something big was in the works. And Bibi, to his credit, paid attention. He removed the troops that would be responsible to respond to this action to more distant locations. This allowed the carnage to be greater, the outrage to be greater. 

He also invoked the Hannibal Directive, and the number of israelis that died from jewish bullets was likely greater than those who died at the hands of Hamas. 

You cane easily spot the jewish bullets, as a small piece of led is nicked from each. Every time the IDF fires 37 bullets, they get enough led by this method to make one bullet for free. Sounds petty as hillary,. but It all adds up.

Do you mean "lud"?


 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 9:22 pm

I have to say this sudden position taking is refreshing. This isn't just cheap and patently homosexual sniping from the bushes. This is calling out the pink team - even if it's the lavender team doing the outcalling. I see you had permission for this opinion from the New York Times. Which signals to me that Bibi's time has come, and Trump is no more going to save Bibi than he will Bolsonaro (whom I like, naturally - but that gets him no free coffee). 

Yes, the right is queer as folk for pounding Iran. The cartoons inside their empty heads - though very badly drawn - are quite effective in erasing their humanity.

You've never seen me voice support for Bibi's 'strategy' relative to Palestinians.

I doubt I've expressed any such sentiment in decades. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 10:00 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 10:00 pm

You've never seen me voice support for Bibi's 'strategy' relative to Palestinians.

I doubt I've expressed any such sentiment in decades.

More than likely because Trump is pro-Israel (mostly). If Trump is pro-whatever, we all know what you are going to do.

*Huey » 11 Jul 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 11:23 am

THe source is a paper that was silent and then downplayed the Holocaust.

Oh, give it a **** rest. The NYT of the 1930s isn't on trial here. The **** thing was owned by Adolf Ochs - the son ofa rabbi.

Whining that a jewish paper didn't do enough for jews in the 1930s in order to discredit that same still-jewish newspaper's attack on a jew in the 2020s is a bit **** much, don't ya think? I mean, there's reaching, and then there's REEEEEACHING..,

The story that you're missing is that the NYT is taking potshots at Bibi. In a word, sell.If you're holding any Bibi, **** sell. 
 

*Huey » 11 Jul 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 11:47 am

Take a stand first.  Was the NY Times silent on the holocaust?

I'm your huckleberry. 

Tell me when "The Holocaust" started. What day? If you're going to demand people say whether the NYT was silent on it, you need to define this holocaust and give it some **** time parameters.

I know that is a lot to ask, since you masters keep adding to the list - I think it's up to three or four billion dead gefilte-brefs at this point. But the bullying wasn't the burying, and if you're gonna use hot button words and then demand answers about them, you need to give us a year when you believe this holocaust began. Do you think it began with Krystal Nacht, or do you think the first batch of crispy critters fired the starter's pistol? When do you believe it went from forced apartheid to conscripted labor and then to mass extermination? They didn't start exterminating people the day the national socialists won, ya know. 

And please - bear in mind I lost two uncles at Auschwitz - so don't go calling me Aunty Smite. 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 12:04 pm

I have no idea.

Now answer the question.

When you chose to quote the NYT, how could you NOT have pre-buttressed your defenses of that paper's handling of the Holocaust?

There are likely papers available in peer reviewed journals which compare the NYT's behavior during the holocaust to that of other papers similarly situated. That you did not have a meta-study or two on hand demonstrates poor preparation for an objection to your source that anyone with a standard jeweler's loop and a penchant for collecting gnats could have predicted. 

The minute I saw you reference that paper, I naturally thought, oh **** - here come the anti-semite smears in 3,2...
 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 12:43 pm

It's not about me, or The Holocaust....or even The NYT..
 

Okay, I have been laughing for quite a while as I have responded to all of this silliness about the holocaust. 

I like taters and you like rice, so CLEARLY, why do you want to murder jews?

But this right here - the fact that you even hadda SAY this **** right here - is some knee slappin, rip-roarin hilarity in Pointerville. 

I know most the *** on this board think I'm an angry man - on account of my constant anger and all. But I get more **** mirth from this place than any three of y'all other *** combined - and the sentence I isolated in your post is a perfect example of what I find hilarious here. It's like emotional slapstick up in here on the regular. 
 

RebelGator » 11 Jul 2025, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 12:50 pm

You don't know much do you?
 

They could write a whole book about what he don't know.