Liberal Forum

*Huey » 11 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm

And there won't be until you take a clear stand.  The NYT's has a negative history about the Jews.

The NYT was and is owned and run by jews. So, there's that. 

And then there'syour baseline. Which paper did the whole jew thing BETTER than the NYT. And if none, why do you suppose that is? Was the ENTIRE jew-dominated media Aunty Smite?

Please - take your time. Talk to me as if I were a small child, and help me to understand why I should read the NYT's story about Bibi with a grain of salt from the 1930s. If ya REALLY wanna hep me out, tell me whether hollywood and the AMA are also Aunty Smite. And the field of dentistry - pretty big on Aunty Smitism, or not so much?

Was Sigmund Freud an Aunty Smite? I can't find a single bad thing he had to say about the holy cost. Nothing he has to say interests me - harrumph. 
 
 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 2:04 pm

There's no denying that the NY Times has been among the biggest Jew-haters in media, so you're right, they're opinions will ALWAYS be slanted against Israel.

You doubled upon your daily dose of stupid today.

A negative about bibi is NOT an attack on israel.

The NYT is not Aunty Smitic. To this very day, the same JEWISH Ochs-Suzlberger family that controlled it in the 1930s still controls it.

Calling jews aunty smites just makes you look really stupid. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 10:00 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 10:00 pm

You've never seen me voice support for Bibi's 'strategy' relative to Palestinians.

I doubt I've expressed any such sentiment in decades.

I doubt you've taken any position on the issue at all, up until now. 

How would I find something that does not exist?
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 9:57 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 9:57 pm

Do you mean "lud"?

Savor the flavor, you ***.   
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 9:23 pm

Sometimes the medium is the message, sonny. 

But you would never understand that.

Except...

https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.2259503 ... 8f8.u2.jpg

And the "medium" presented no evidence since no court in this nation would call "unnamed sources" as admissible as evidence.

And your attempts to insult requires stooping to a level you dwell on in order to "hit". I refuse.

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 10:54 pm

The NYT was and is owned and run by jews. So, there's that. 

And then there'syour baseline. Which paper did the whole jew thing BETTER than the NYT. And if none, why do you suppose that is? Was the ENTIRE jew-dominated media Aunty Smite?

Please - take your time. Talk to me as if I were a small child, and help me to understand why I should read the NYT's story about Bibi with a grain of salt from the 1930s. If ya REALLY wanna hep me out, tell me whether hollywood and the AMA are also Aunty Smite. And the field of dentistry - pretty big on Aunty Smitism, or not so much?

Was Sigmund Freud an Aunty Smite? I can't find a single bad thing he had to say about the holy cost. Nothing he has to say interests me - harrumph. 
 
 

He doesn't say anything anymore. All he ever said remains in written words and recorded conversations. He is dead. His ideas are what enabled corrupting humans cradle to grave.

*Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2025, 4:24 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 4:24 am

Except...

https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.2259503 ... 8f8.u2.jpg

And the "medium" presented no evidence since no court in this nation would call "unnamed sources" as admissible as evidence.

And your attempts to insult requires stooping to a level you dwell on in order to "hit". I refuse.

Right. You think that happened, and you thinkthat cheap meme applies. 

Because you would not know evidence if it got between you and some random jew-cock you were intent on sucking. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 12:46 pm

Stifle it, coward.

*YAWNS INCESSANTLY*
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2025, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 6:19 am

How Netanyahu Prolonged the War in Gaza to Stay in Power

Through interviews with more than 110 officials in Israel, the United States and across the Arab world, as well as a review of dozens of government records and other documents, we reveal how Netanyahu’s actions first made Israel more vulnerable to the October disaster and then helped to prolong and expand the ensuing war. Unexpectedly, the war’s expansion allowed Israel to defeat Hezbollah and bruise Iran. But its extension in Gaza brought relentless misery for Palestinians, led to the deaths of Israeli hostages and allowed Netanyahu to defer a political reckoning.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/maga ... aways.html

why does it take so **** long for people to recognize The Obvious?

Having spent much of his time in office appeasing hard liners to stay there, Bibi was on the verge of being nailed for corruption...then Hamas threw him a life line.

His response to Oct. 7th has been largely self serving, and as he spent the political currency, opinion in Israel shifted....

But you can always rally global Hawks and their dimwit minions against Iran....it's an easy sell to slack jaws, FOX demographic wind socks and other cretins. 

The Kumbaya Krowd is on board the minute you start talking "penetration" and "bunker buster"....

So Netanyahu wages war with Iran - enabled by The Big Dunce...whose participation is a Yuge Success, regardless of any actual damage assessment - or you are spitting on Sgt. York and America.

Let a steady breeze stoke the fire of the bolgia wherein those two yutzes spend eternity riding a rotisserie...

October 7th was Bebe's Pearl Harbor.  He knew it was coming and used it for persuasion of his people to engage in Gazan Genocide.

At least Joe tried to  make sure the Gazans had full stomachs when our bombs killed them

Thinking is way too hard for so many on this place.  I admit it is more difficult for me navigating the modernpocalypse.  My Dunning Kruger Function is a roller coaster ride.
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 11:03 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 11:03 pm

You doubled upon your daily dose of stupid today.

The NYT is not Aunty Smitic. To this very day, the same JEWISH Ochs-Suzlberger family that controlled it in the 1930s still controls it.

Calling jews aunty smites just makes you look really stupid.

Foolishly attempting to deny it makes you look like a gullible and ignorant fool!
Here, stupid.  Once again I have to educate you and your moronic Jew-haters:

The NY Times’ blatant antisemitism
Advertisers have no business supporting it and truth-loving people have no reason to read it
by James Sinkinson

James Sinkinson is the president of Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME), an organization dedicated to researching Middle East developments and exposing false propaganda that could harm US interests. A passionate advocate for Israel, he frequently provides insightful analysis and works to counter media bias.

(March 14, 2023 / JNS)The New York Times has rarely been good for the Jews or the Jewish state, despite the paper’s nominally Jewish ownership since 1896. At best, the Times’ coverage of Jews and Israel reeks of misinformation and half-truths. At worst, it is openly biased and hateful. A recent study confirms blatant anti-Israel bias on the part of the paper. It shows the Times consistently omits or minimizes critical details about the threats Israel faces. The Times also contains disproportionately negative content about the Jewish state and dramatically understates crimes committed by Palestinian terrorist groups against Jews and Israel.

 

How an anti-Semitic cartoon ended up in The NY Times
CNN Business 5/2/19

NY CNN Business — Reporters in The NY Times (NYT) newsroom could hear the protesters outside on Monday. “Shame on you!” they shouted. Some held signs that accused the newspaper of being anti-Semitic. Others waved American and Israeli flags.The demonstrators packed 8th Avenue in NYC in response to a recent cartoon that was baldly anti-Semitic. The image appeared in international editions of The Times last Thursday. It called to mind “a very dark time in Jewish history,” lawyer Alan Dershowitz said at the protest. “I ask myself, how could it have happened?” That’s what staffers at The Times wanted to know too. In interviews this week, 16 Times staffers described a short-staffed international publication; an opinion section prone to self-inflicted wounds; and an ongoing debate about the newspaper’s biases and blind spots.

 

The New York Times can’t stop lying about Israel
Progressive media has a double standard when it comes to the Jewish state
The Telegraph by David Christopher Kaufman 10/27/23

Looks like you're about the only one who's too dumb to see it for yourself!

  
The shameful record of the NY Times giving unswerving  support to the anti-Semitic, anti-Israel Congressional trio of Rep. Ilhan Omar, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Rashida Tlaib  reinforces that silence is no longer an option.

 
 

Zeets2 » 12 Jul 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 12:23 pm

Foolishly attempting to deny it makes you look like a gullible and ignorant fool!
Here, stupid.  Once again I have to educate you and your moronic Jew-haters:

Looks like you're about the only one who's too dumb to see it for yourself!

Sweet Jesus - JEW FIGHTS? You bring me **** jew fights - jewy jews trying to prove they are jewier than other jewy jews?

They're **** jews, you moron - not Aunty Smites. Get a grip, you hysterical old broad.

And for the record, you idiot, the NYT has a BIG pro-israel slant. Just not big enough for others with a BIGGER pro-israel slant. 

 
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 8:20 am

Right. You think that happened, and you thinkthat cheap meme applies. 

Because you would not know evidence if it got between you and some random jew-cock you were intent on sucking.

Do I also have to tell you that your insults requite stooping below your level? I don't comply.

*Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2025, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:17 pm

Do I also have to tell you that your insults requite stooping below your level? I don't comply.

Oh, you try, fruitcake. You're just not very good at it.
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 12:38 pm

Sweet Jesus - JEW FIGHTS? You bring me **** jew fights - jewy jews trying to prove they are jewier than other jewy jews?

They're **** jews, you moron - not Aunty Smites. Get a grip, you hysterical old broad.

And for the record, you idiot, the NYT has a BIG pro-israel slant. Just not big enough for others with a BIGGER pro-israel slant.

 
 

Cannonpointer » 11 Jul 2025, 10:54 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2025, 10:54 pm

The NYT was and is owned and run by jews. So, there's that. 

And then there'syour baseline. Which paper did the whole jew thing BETTER than the NYT. And if none, why do you suppose that is? Was the ENTIRE jew-dominated media Aunty Smite?

Please - take your time. Talk to me as if I were a small child, and help me to understand why I should read the NYT's story about Bibi with a grain of salt from the 1930s. If ya REALLY wanna hep me out, tell me whether hollywood and the AMA are also Aunty Smite. And the field of dentistry - pretty big on Aunty Smitism, or not so much?

Was Sigmund Freud an Aunty Smite? I can't find a single bad thing he had to say about the holy cost. Nothing he has to say interests me - harrumph. 
 
 

Patterns of behavior in social circle logistics all follow specific intellectual constructs different from natural constructs of human population daily living now regardless the ancestral lineage is black, brown, yellow, red, white or hybrids between the 5 basic characteristics due to geographical locations of their specific ancestral origins to living native to this atmosphere since inception of this species in the last 7,000 years of ancestries never same ancestors lived as conceived twice in two separate generations since inception of the species into current events population changes people alive daily here.

Your mind projects anything else is possible but the one way you exist per heartbeat and brain navigating space in series parallel time now since entering life as unique you by chromosomes conception to decomposed corpse.

Ask yourself these physical absolute questions without theories and theologies, philosophies or psychologies.

What was your origin into being alive daily here?
Which generation have you achieved after birth compared to your siblings and cousins?
When was the rotation of your conception since everyone only celebrates their day of birth?
Who do you rather be in context than all you were since equally added to the species daily here in a specific body, generation gap, ancestral lineage, species limited to time adapting as displaced so far?

When soul searching for whom you should be, pay attention to the sole time you get living between heartbeats and brain navigating personal location while eternally separated by the moment here.

I seem to be the last ancestor alive capable of navigating how eternal separated chromosomes actually inhabit space uniquely alive daily here as an ever changing form that cannot create or destroy the natural balancing universe that sustains my time alive so far.

Thermodynamic principles most principals of reasonable doubt punish anyone describing why and how they exist in equal time daily here.

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 12:38 pm

Sweet Jesus - JEW FIGHTS? You bring me **** jew fights - jewy jews trying to prove they are jewier than other jewy jews?

They're **** jews, you moron - not Aunty Smites. Get a grip, you hysterical old broad.

And for the record, you idiot, the NYT has a BIG pro-israel slant. Just not big enough for others with a BIGGER pro-israel slant.

You're a **** moron, and it's time you realized that! 
It's JEWS stating how biased the NY Times is, and you can't stand that because it proves what an ignorant liar you are!
A Jew can be anti-Semitic if he hates Arabs, and an Arab can be an anti-Semite if he hates Jews, just like you!

Now, would you care to show me examples of that "BIG pro-Israel slant" you claim is at the NY Times?  Because I've never seen it and I've seen DOZENS of examples just like the ones I posted showing how badly the NY Times is biased against Jews, which no doubt is the real reason you love them, asshole!
 

Zeets2 » 13 Jul 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:08 pm

A Jew can be anti-Semitic if he hates Arabs,

Psst. Jackass.

You are not accusing the jew-controlled NYT of hating arabs. How **** dumb are you really, you unwiped *** of a bush ape?

Here is a quick AI, queer. I would do a deeper dive for a deeper poster, but I am already aware that you are a full diaper who is immune to evidence.

Accusations of pro-Israel bias in The New York Times' coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have been raised over the years. Some critics point to specific examples to support their claims. 

Here are some arguments and examples used to support the claim of The New York Times exhibiting pro-Israel bias:

• Terminology and framing:
  • One common criticism is the use of different terminology to describe Israelis and Palestinians involved in the conflict. For example, some argue that the Times has used terms like "hostages" for Israelis captured by Hamas, while describing Palestinians held in Israeli prisons as "prisoners," suggesting guilt for the latter.
  •  
  • Critics have also pointed to the disproportionate use of emotionally charged language. For instance, a study noted that the Times used terms like "massacre" and "slaughter" significantly more often to describe Israeli deaths compared to Palestinian deaths, despite a higher Palestinian death toll in specific periods.
• Emphasis on suffering:
  • Some analyses suggest that the Times' coverage may emphasize Israeli suffering while downplaying Palestinian casualties or their narratives.

 

Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm

Psst. Jackass.

You are not accusing the jew-controlled NYT of hating arabs. How **** dumb are you really, you unwiped *** of a bush ape?

Here is a quick AI, queer. I would do a deeper dive for a deeper poster, but I am already aware that you are a full diaper who is immune to evidence.

Where's the party? Where's the Disco?

https://youtu.be/jLwZvg46jms?si=qCnYdxt7rZPU7c39

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 4:40 pm

Oh, you try, fruitcake. You're just not very good at it.

Did you try to say something that missed again??

Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm

Psst. Jackass.

You are not accusing the jew-controlled NYT of hating arabs. How **** dumb are you really, you unwiped *** of a bush ape?

Here is a quick AI, queer. I would do a deeper dive for a deeper poster, but I am already aware that you are a full diaper who is immune to evidence.

Some analyses suggest that the Times' coverage may emphasize Israeli suffering while downplaying Palestinian casualties or their narratives.

Hey Jackass! 
There is NOTHING inaccurate or biased about the NY Times calling those civilians taken by Hamas on Oct. 7th hostages!  And they immediately threatened them with harm as a negotiating tool against Israel.  They were UNARMED CIVILIANS, you **** moron!  Those Hamas terrorists that Israel captured WERE ENGAGED IN WAR AGAINST ISRAEL using weapons against them, and that makes them PRISONERS, NOT HOSTAGES!  Even an empty bonehead like YOU would be able to see the difference if not for your blind Jew hatred!

Now, are you going to claim that the Oct. 7th murder of over 1200 UNARMED Israeli citizens was anything BUT a massacre or a slaughter?  What would YOU call it, Shakespeare?  Simply because other Jew-hating reporters claim that "SOME ANALYSES SUGGEST" that Palestinian casualties are downplayed is a far cry from the documented evidence of how the Hamas massacre on Oct. 7th differed from ANYTHING the Israeli army ever did!  Can you support your stupid belief with evidence that their IDF EVER tortured, raped, and murdered CIVILIANS in their war effort?  Yes, civilians on both sides of a war often are killed.  But did the IDF EVER set fire to infants and children in front of their parents before beheading them or murder infants in their cribs?  Do they routinely enter the home of civilians and murder children sleeping in their beds? 

So before you try to make such an idiotic claim that the NY Times is unbiased in their reporting, you've got to do a better job than simply coming up with a defense with something that "some analyses suggest"!

Got it NOW, Jew hater?  Of course you don't!  So let me rub these photos into your racist face!:


Blood stains remain on a floor of a nursery in Kibbutz Be'eri

Why don't you tell us how much you enjoyed reliving that day through these pictures, you **** asshole?