Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:11 pm

Mine...all of them.

Prove it. 

 

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:13 pm

Prove it.

Post the rule on proving.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:14 pm

Post the rule on proving.

    Post the rule about posting rules. 

Look at you stall. Just look at you.Stall! Stall! Srall!


Hey, I have a "are these your words?" that you can have to copy to your "Vegas" folder that it's downloaded on your computer. Ready? 

"With each delay, you offer yet more proof of your unfamiliarity with survivorship bias—impressive, really."

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:19 pm

    Post the rule about posting rules. 

Look at you stall. Just look at you.Stall! Stall! Srall!

Hey, I have a "are these your words?" that you can have to copy to your "Vegas" folder that it's downloaded on your computer. Ready? 

"With each delay, you offer yet more proof of your unfamiliarity with survivorship bias—impressive, really."

you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.  

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:22 pm

 

Copies me again. More evidence of "No thoughts of his own."
1. More evidence coming





Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:24 pm

Copies me again. More evidence of "No thoughts of his own."
1. More evidence coming


 

Evidence of your lying & cowardice.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:27 pm

Evidence of your lying & cowardice.

Speaking of your lying and cowardice. Check this out: 




Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:28 pm

Speaking of your 

Yes...that is the definition of Survivorship bias in my words. 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 9:17 am

Groan....

OH BROTHER !!

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:31 pm

Yes...that is the definition of Survivorship bias in my words.

This again? Ok. Here we go again. You are getting the video.


1. Your definition is vague. All answers meet your definition, but there is only one right answer.
2. If you believe in your definition, then use it to answer. 

How many god damn times....

↓
↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 12:41 pm

This again? Ok. Here we go again. You are getting the video.

1. Your definition is vague. All answers meet your definition, but there is only one right answer.
 

You aren't qualified to comment.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 1:19 pm

You aren't qualified to comment.

Speaking of you not being qualified, is that why you refuse to answer? 



Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm

Speaking of you not being qualified, is that why you refuse to answer? 

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.


 

Every option includes your definition,

Prove it.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 1:36 pm

Prove it.

After you answer. 

Vegas » 13 Jul 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 1:38 pm

After you answer.

Marching on down the board.. Catch me if you can in the Texas Flood of Lies

https://i.postimg.cc/90K0LsrT/photo-24088.jpg

https://youtu.be/8j3_DUqKyTk?si=H0dG7GsMYZ_LbVcg

 
 

*Huey » 12 Jul 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 9:31 am

EPA website debunks “chemtrails” theory after Texas flood

https://www.yahoo.com/news/epa-website- ... 15656.html

You put the quotes on the wrong word duh. 

It goes on DEBUNKS. 
 

PhiloBeddo » 12 Jul 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 10:20 am

Chem trails? Are you **** retarded. Do you wear a propeller hat? Get a **** life.

You're a weak little bring nothing queer. 
 
 

RebelGator » 13 Jul 2025, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 5:57 am

No, it's called jet engine exhaust.....the same phenomenon exhibited by BV's *** during flight.

You're a retarded asswipe. You're so weak it's just sad.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2025, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2025, 6:00 am

"Being sprayed"?

Don't ******. If you want to suggest that there are ongoing global conspiracies seeking to manipulate the weather, stand up and say it.

Cloud seeding turned 80 recently...

Don't ******, ******. You SEEM to be saying that ongoing global conspiracies seeking to manipulate the weather turned 80 recently.

Is that what you're saying, you panty dancing ***?
 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2025, 12:01 pm

You're a retarded asswipe. You're so weak it's just sad.

Yep, I know because I don't buy into every half-baked conspiratorial ****. You see a Jew behind every bush, surely you can tie that to chem trails.