As you know, queer boi, we are talking about the condensation from jet planes.RebelGator » 14 Jul 2025, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you want to retract that statement or have it shoved up your ***?![]()
why is the UK funding it?Blackvegetable » 14 Jul 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I explained why what is referred to as chemtrail is readily explained and debunked as a weather control strategy.
What I saw was you punching yourself and grabbing yourself by the ******. I edamned sure didn't see a light loafered panty waist like you "debunking" a **** thing.Blackvegetable » 14 Jul 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I explained why what is referred to as chemtrail is readily explained and debunked as a weather control strategy.
... to blathe...Blackvegetable » 14 Jul 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Because we had tried and found it unreliable...had it been effective, we wouldn't have agreed not to.
You mean you baselessly claimed that, fruit.Blackvegetable » 14 Jul 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I explained why what is referred to as chemtrail is readily explained and debunked as a weather control strategy.
The claim that "large-scale weather modification experiments cannot be conducted in secret" is pretty damned precious. Of COURSE they cannot. That is why half the **** world understands what they are looking at when the airlines turn our skies into checkerboards right in front of our eyes - and then the lines on those checkerboards soften, expand, thin out, and become a general haze. They are looking at chemtrails. And the dimwits, dullards, and dunces among us are too craven and lazy and cowardly to think for themselves, so they ignore their eyes and their sense and they defer to "experts."Mrkelly » 14 Jul 2025, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ why is the UK funding it?
https://www.ndtv.com/science/fake-news- ... ed-8420972
What's a Fact:The UK government is funding geoengineering research to explore its potential in slowing global warming.The experiments will study the feasibility of reflecting sunlight using particles in the stratosphere.What's Fake:Claims that the UK has been secretly conducting geoengineering experiments for years to control the population.The "chemtrails" conspiracy theory, which suggests planes are spraying harmful chemicals over the public.Experts emphasise that large-scale weather modification experiments cannot be conducted in secret, and the UK's research aims to provide crucial data on geoengineering's potential.
had to bring up “they are not doing it to control the population” for manufactured consent
what most are worried about is all the aluminum that will be/and has been dumped into our atmosphere
again … The UK is gonna do it
say that the claim that they have been dumping aluminum into our atmosphere for decades is BS
what do you think of the UK doing it?
No...
**** your fantasies.Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2025, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑ The claim that "large-scale weather modification experiments cannot be conducted in secret" is pretty damned precious. Of COURSE they cannot. That is why half the **** world understands what they are looking at when the airlines turn our skies into checkerboards right in front of our eyes - and then the lines on those checkerboards soften, expand, thin out, and become a general haze. They are looking at chemtrails. And the dimwits, dullards, and dunces among us are too craven and lazy and cowardly to think for themselves, so they ignore their eyes and their sense and they defer to "experts."
You're a **** idiot...we tried to extend the Vietnamese monsoon season...it wasn't very effective...Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2025, 11:34 pm » wrote: ↑ ... to blathe...
Nice bluff, blufftard. That isn't how science works. "It can't be done - sign the trearty" said no scientist ever except in *** fantasy land.
"We need more money for research" said every scientist always in hetero reality land.
Your weakness is rivaled only by the tininess of your feet, fruitcake.
Tell mama.
it was too successfulBlackvegetable » 15 Jul 2025, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot...we tried to extend the Vietnamese monsoon season...it wasn't very effective...
Had it been, we wouldn't have given it up....it took the US 10 years to ratify the Convention Against Torture.
Don't bother with the hysterical response.
Just nod..
GeorgeWashington » 12 Jul 2025, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ "Cloud seeding" is an 80-year-old technology that adds tiny particles—usually silver iodide crystals—to clouds to trigger rain or snow.
https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107 ... nvolvement.
Demand for water is increasing as U.S. droughts are expected to get more frequent and intense. "Cloud seeding" is an 80-year-old technology that adds tiny particles—usually silver iodide crystals—to clouds to trigger rain or snow.
But the benefits of this technology are unproven. Some states are using cloud seeding, but there is little federal involvement.
This technology assessment looks at how policies might address challenges such as:
Unavailable or unreliable data on effectivenessUnpredictable cloud conditions, which need to be favorable for cloud seedingUncertain safety of using silver iodide more widely
Mrkelly » 15 Jul 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ it was too successful
c)In one instance, the rainfall continued as the cloud moved eastward across the Vietnam border and inundated a U.S. Special Forces camp with nine inches of rain in four hours.
(d)DOD scientists consider that the experiment demonstrated a capacity to raise and maintain rainfall under controlled conditions to the level at which the land is saturated over a sustained period, slowing movement on foot and rendering the operation of vehicles impracticable.
4. In our view, the experiments were undeniably successful, indicating that, at least under weather and terrain conditions such as those involved, the U.S. Government has realized a capability of significant weather modification. If anything, the tests were “too successful”—neither the volume of induced rainfall nor the extent of area affected can be precisely predicted. The only absolute control, therefore, is after the fact, i.e., to halt cloud-seeding missions.
https://history.state.gov/historicaldoc ... 68v28/d274
many US states openly us it … Utah being one of the leaders since the 50s
Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ c) that's failure...
d)."under controlled conditions"
Cloud seeding isn't 100% reliable when done on a small scale, with small planes flying through the clouds.....probability of success diminishes with scale.
In our view, the experiments were undeniably successful,
Fund me!
“it wasn't very effectiveracist
Is that your fantasy, fruity?
Yeah, yeah, queer - and Limpy Peterson got a grubstake from the boys at the Lazy Y.Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2025, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑ You're a **** idiot...we tried to extend the Vietnamese monsoon season...it wasn't very effective...
Uh huh. And what does she say?
What do you do when your step dad rapes you?Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, yeah, queer - and Limpy Peterson got a grubstake from the boys at the Lazy Y.
Don't believe old Limpy ever did end up hitting the mother lode.
But he had more gumption than the we-quit scientitians of your *** fantasies.![]()
![]()
That's a major pile of butt hurt right there, Lucinda.Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2025, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you do when your step dad rapes you?
Tell mama.
Uh huh. And what does she say?
Yeah, yeah, queer