Liberal Forum

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhd ... _src=embed

REPORTER: Can you explain how you calculated your latest round of tariffs? Was there a formula that was used? 

TRUMP: The formula was a formula based on common sense

https://www.thedailybeast.com/aoc-calls ... risis-dig/

“Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?” the New York congresswoman wrote on X Friday.

 
 

One of them is going to kill people.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm

REPORTER: Can you explain how you calculated your latest round of tariffs? Was there a formula that was used? 

TRUMP: The formula was a formula based on common sense

 

funny how you presented a small part of his answer....here is the rest LOSER.

The formula was a formula based on common sense, based on the deficits, on how we have been treated over the years, and based on raw numbers.

MR-7 » 12 Jul 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:30 pm

funny how you presented a small part of his answer....here is the rest LOSER.

The formula was a formula based on common sense, based on the deficits, on how we have been treated over the years, and based on raw numbers.

In short, ****.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:40 pm

In short, ****.

I agree...you are short, and full of ****
 

MR-7 » 12 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm

I agree...you are short, and full of ****

on how we have been treated over the years

A) How is that quantified?

B) WTF would he know about it?

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhd ... _src=embed

REPORTER: Can you explain how you calculated your latest round of tariffs? Was there a formula that was used? 

TRUMP: The formula was a formula based on common sense

https://www.thedailybeast.com/aoc-calls ... risis-dig/

“Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?” the New York congresswoman wrote on X Friday.

Common sense vs common sense. Speaking of which- @Cannonpointer  and Huey used common sense to get this question, yet you can't get ****. You can't even get it with our own stupid definition. 


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

@Blackvegetable  since you are using the same debunked logic over and over, I thought I would save time and give you the same reply over and over. 



1. Your definition is vague. All answers meet your definition, but there is only one right answer.
2. If you believe in your definition, then use it to answer. 

How many god damn times....

↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=49s

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:53 pm

Common sense vs common sense. Speaking of which- @Cannonpointer  and Huey used common sense to get this question, yet you can't get ****. You can't even get it with our own stupid definition. 


 

they used my definition, you **** pilchard.

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm

@Blackvegetable  since you are using the same debunked logic over and over, I thought I would save time and give you the same reply over and over. 

1. Your definition is vague. All answers meet your definition, but there is only one right answer.
 

****.

To demonstrate that you understand what it is, post an example.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:47 pm

A) How is that quantified?

B) WTF would he know about it?

He got it from biden...you simpleton.   

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm

they used my definition, you **** pilchard.

Share that with us.

What can be asserted without evidence...
 

MR-7 » 12 Jul 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:08 pm

He got it from biden...you simpleton.   

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.

Too stupid.

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:09 pm

Share that with us.

What can be asserted without evidence...

Strap yourself to that see-saw while I get some rags and the garden hose.

CNN — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is tightening her grip on her department’s purse strings, ordering that every contract and grant over $100,000 must now cross her desk for approval, according to a memo exclusively obtained by CNN. 


The sweeping directive issued last week adds an extra layer of review for billions of dollars in funding across the Department of Homeland Security, which includes agencies such as US Customs and Border Protection, the Coast Guard, Secret Service and Federal Emergency Management Agency.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/09/politics ... flood-noem

In essence, they say the order has stripped the agency of much of its autonomy at the very moment its help is needed most. “We were operating under a clear set of guidance: lean forward, be prepared, anticipate what the state needs, and be ready to deliver it,” a longtime FEMA official told CNN. “That is not as clear of an intent for us at the moment.” For example, as central Texas towns were submerged in rising waters, FEMA officials realized they couldn’t pre-position Urban Search and Rescue crews from a network of teams stationed regionally across the country....

But even as Texas rescue crews raced to save lives, FEMA officials realized they needed Noem’s approval before sending those additional assets. Noem didn’t authorize FEMA’s deployment of Urban Search and Rescue teams until Monday, more than 72 hours after the flooding began, multiple sources told CNN. 

Homeland Security officials have defended the federal response in Texas and President Donald Trump’s plan to dismantle FEMA and shift more responsibility for disaster response to states. 

Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokeswoman, told CNN that Noem did not need to authorize additional FEMA resources initially because the department used other DHS search and rescue assets. She added that over time, as a need for FEMA resources arose, those requests received Noem’s approval. “FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,” McLaughlin told CNN in a statement. “The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades.” 

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/18/politics ... hs-funding

Can't wait for those tribunals...
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:37 pm

CNN — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is tightening her grip on her department’s purse strings, ordering that every contract and grant over $100,000 must now cross her desk for approval, according to a memo exclusively obtained by CNN. 

The sweeping directive issued last week adds an extra layer of review for billions of dollars in funding across the Department of Homeland Security, which includes agencies such as US Customs and Border Protection, the Coast Guard, Secret Service and Federal Emergency Management Agency.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/09/politics ... flood-noem

In essence, they say the order has stripped the agency of much of its autonomy at the very moment its help is needed most. “We were operating under a clear set of guidance: lean forward, be prepared, anticipate what the state needs, and be ready to deliver it,” a longtime FEMA official told CNN. “That is not as clear of an intent for us at the moment.” For example, as central Texas towns were submerged in rising waters, FEMA officials realized they couldn’t pre-position Urban Search and Rescue crews from a network of teams stationed regionally across the country....

But even as Texas rescue crews raced to save lives, FEMA officials realized they needed Noem’s approval before sending those additional assets. Noem didn’t authorize FEMA’s deployment of Urban Search and Rescue teams until Monday, more than 72 hours after the flooding began, multiple sources told CNN. 

Homeland Security officials have defended the federal response in Texas and President Donald Trump’s plan to dismantle FEMA and shift more responsibility for disaster response to states. 

Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokeswoman, told CNN that Noem did not need to authorize additional FEMA resources initially because the department used other DHS search and rescue assets. She added that over time, as a need for FEMA resources arose, those requests received Noem’s approval. “FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,” McLaughlin told CNN in a statement. “The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades.” 

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/18/politics ... hs-funding

Can't wait for those tribunals...

And Sarah Huckabee ain't gettin no help in Arkansas for Tornado damage.  The common sense is ruining peoples lives and killibg America.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm

Too stupid.

China is rocking EV's out like crackerjack prizes.  China no longer has to ride a bike to work

While we abandon diplomacy and fire 1300 State Department Officials the PRC is ramping theirs up.

America will be a  third world **** hole country by 2028.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhd ... _src=embed

REPORTER: Can you explain how you calculated your latest round of tariffs? Was there a formula that was used? 

TRUMP: The formula was a formula based on common sense

https://www.thedailybeast.com/aoc-calls ... risis-dig/

“Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?” the New York congresswoman wrote on X Friday.

More Fake news from the Fake news Dickhead

anyone surprised?

didn't think so

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm

Strap yourself to that see-saw while I get some rags and the garden hose.

What ya WON'T do is answer Vegas' question. 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:00 pm

What ya WON'T do is answer Vegas' question.

I don't see any reason to...