Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm

Too stupid.

A) How is that quantified?

B) WTF would he know about it?
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm

Too stupid.

Yeppers....a last-minute thing there to get more votes by "appeasing" the auto industry. 

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.



 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm

****.

To demonstrate that you understand what it is, post an example.

        More copouts. ^^^

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm

they used my definition, you **** pilchard.

    Prove it. 

@Cannonpointer  whose definition did you use? Not that this **** will believe it. 


 

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:35 pm

        More copouts. ^^^

I don't see an example 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:37 pm

I don't see an example

More stalling. ^^^ I prove I posted two and you are banned for a year. Deal?

1. You will now say the usual - those weren't examples without providing any evidence that you debunked them.
^^^ Then for this, you will lie and say that you did debunk them, but won't provide evidence.

So **** predictable..
 

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:40 pm

More stalling. ^^^ I prove I posted two and you are banned for a year. Deal?

1. You will now say the usual - those weren't examples without providing any evidence that you debunked them.
^^^ Then for this, you will lie and say that you did debunk them, but won't provide evidence.

So **** predictable..

All I have to do is assert it.
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 2:09 pm

Share that with us.

What can be asserted without evidence...

@Blackvegetable  Where's that link?
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:42 pm

All I have to do is assert it.

The rules don't apply to narcissists ^^^

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:43 pm

The rules don't apply to narcissists ^^^

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

C
 

MR-7 » 12 Jul 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:51 pm

C

I can't say yet. He is looking for someone else to answer, so he doesn't have to. If he ever gets around to it, which is unlikely, then I will reveal the answer. 

I'll give you a hint - you see his definition? It applies to A, B, C, and D. But there is only one correct one.       

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:43 pm

The rules don't apply to narcissists ^^^


 

Post the rule in question. 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:01 pm

I don't see any reason to...

You never do.
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2025, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 4:40 pm

You never do.

That's a lie.


 

MR-7 » 12 Jul 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:51 pm

C

Tell @*VegasVagina how you figured that out.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 4:41 pm

That's a lie.

I bow to your expertise on that subject, Pook. 

Vegas » 12 Jul 2025, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 3:54 pm

I can't say yet. He is looking for someone else to answer, so he doesn't have to. If he ever gets around to it, which is unlikely, then I will reveal the answer. 

I'll give you a hint - you see his definition? It applies to A, B, C, and D. But there is only one correct one.     

Explain how A satisfies my definition...

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:22 pm

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhd ... _src=embed

REPORTER: Can you explain how you calculated your latest round of tariffs? Was there a formula that was used? 

TRUMP: The formula was a formula based on common sense

https://www.thedailybeast.com/aoc-calls ... risis-dig/

“Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?” the New York congresswoman wrote on X Friday.

Aaron Rupar is a far left lying hack. Which is why Bv adores him.          
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 4:43 pm

Tell @*VegasVagina how you figured that out.

If he asks me, I will. But not from your demand.
 

MR-7 » 12 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm

I agree...you are short, and full of ****