Do you really think if there was anything on Trump, the Democrats wouldn't have used it during the Presidential campaign?Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2025, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ But at least he got out front and stopped the evidence of his perversions from being released.
Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2025, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ She is not a news channel. She can call him a rapist - it's her opinion. He doesn't have a case, here.
What law school did u graduate from?Cannonpointer » 13 Jul 2025, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump cannot sue her for having - and voiving - that opinion. The man is on record admitting that he grabs women by the ******.
I KNEW it.*Beekeeper » 15 Jul 2025, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑ Then perhaps with your "superior intellect" you can explain why your boy Stephypoopolous didn't use the "It's my opinion that Trump is a convicted rapist" defense and fight his $16 million dollar payout??
100%, if they would be giving up their own side in the process.Cedar » 15 Jul 2025, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Do you really think if there was anything on Trump, the Democrats wouldn't have used it during the Presidential campaign?
Oh, the money to defend her is on tap - bet on that. The last time I saw Trump sitting for discovery, it looked **** BAD. Have you forgotten that **** show?*Huey » 15 Jul 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑ I guess she his hoping that is true because she does not have millions and millions to pay.
Urmom U.
Good, no one want's your "opinion". And that's all it would be is your "opinion"Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I KNEW it.
I knew you were this stupid. ^
Not gonna fix it for ya, weakness. You're too stupid to know the answer - and you will remain ignorant, if it is up to me to school you.
Good...for a minute I thought you were saying, Your mom University.
Exactly! Make her go back to bar tending and making people a **** drink.

Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2025, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I would beg to differ, but I am not a beggar. So I just differ, is all.
You would have to search high and low to find a *** who has worked harder than trump to convince folks that calling him a rapist is not out of line. Bragging about ****** grabbing, perving on Miss Teen USA contestants, macking on his own daughter. Give me a **** break. There's nothing evil in seeing him through jaundiced eyes. There's something quite evil about pretending he's george worshington crossing the deleware to assault king george's airports.
The *** shredded the pedo-files on his way to starting wwiii. It's time for folks to wake up.
No one wants a president who covers for pedophiles.MR-7 » 15 Jul 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Good, no one want's your "opinion". And that's all it would be is your "opinion"
Yeah, that's fine.DeezerShoove » 15 Jul 2025, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Seeing him piss people off royally is about all I can find appealing.
Watching a halfrican annoy a few folks on one side deserves a carnival barker returning the favor.
Both are giant-ego politicians.
One was/is beloved by people I can't stand... The other, opposite.
There is a school of thought that WWIII won't happen at in the way those other two played out.Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that's fine.
I'm concerned about WWIII, myself. The fat cockroach is making all the right moves to get all the wrong things happening.
No one wants a president who covers for pedophiles.Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ No one wants a president who covers for pedophiles.
Except alphabet people. Know what I mean, Vern-bgtq?
It's certainly plausible. No one wants to go the full monte because the full monte is MAD.DeezerShoove » 15 Jul 2025, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ There is a school of thought that WWIII won't happen at in the way those other two played out.
It will always be constant skirmishes and proxy events. Never ending frictions played out over many decades that result in much the same thing: millions dead, political boundaries altered (to the satisfaction of almost no one), money by the boatload shifting like snowdrifts.
I happen to lend a lot of credence to this simply because after reading about this (can't remember where I saw it many years ago), it seems to be happening. Brinkmanship Forever.
You seem to be unaware the trumptard is protecting the people who **** babies with epstein.MR-7 » 15 Jul 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ No one wants a president who covers for pedophiles.
TRUE! You and I both voted to save the kids....I voted for TRUMP. Who did you vote for?
Except alphabet people.
TRUE! *** love the kiddies.
Know what I mean, Vern-bgtq?
NO!
Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, the money to defend her is on tap - bet on that. The last time I saw Trump sitting for discovery, it looked **** BAD. Have you forgotten that **** show?
New flash: he hasn't.
Trump is gonna take it, and Trump is gonna like it. End of story. That bitch is too busy sitting on the epstein tapes to bother with the portareecan.