Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I KNEW it.
I knew you were this stupid. ^
Not gonna fix it for ya, weakness. You're too stupid to know the answer - and you will remain ignorant, if it is up to me to school you.
Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I KNEW it.
I knew you were this stupid. ^
Not gonna fix it for ya, weakness. You're too stupid to know the answer - and you will remain ignorant, if it is up to me to school you.
She won't lose, because the pedo-protecting president isn't going to sue, because he **** himself during discovery.*Huey » 16 Jul 2025, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑ not the money to defend her but the money to pay if she loses.
And yes, the Epstein **** is a big problem. They had files and tapes and now they don’t.
If you agreed with me, you insipid fruit, I would slit your wrists.*Beekeeper » 16 Jul 2025, 5:38 am » wrote: ↑ Imagine what it would feel like if people actually agreed with you.
Oh, look - a squirrel.*Beekeeper » 16 Jul 2025, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑Seeing how you think you are going to "fix it" for me, you might want a few facts to help you along, rambus.Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I KNEW it.
I knew you were this stupid. ^
Not gonna fix it for ya, weakness. You're too stupid to know the answer - and you will remain ignorant, if it is up to me to school you.
The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein - WSJ
Try his LAWYER that knows things YOU have no clue about. Then get back with us.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ She won't lose, because the pedo-protecting president isn't going to sue, because he **** himself during discovery.
She - and anyone in america - has every right to call him a raspist. The NEWS CHANNELS do not have the right to make false statements about things that did or did not happen in time and space. Things like, "Trump was convicted of the crime of rape by this jury on this date in this trial. You see, THAT is falsifiable. THAT can be disproved. And THAT makes it defamation. That Trump just "is a rapist" (not a convicted rapist, but a rapist) is not only a matter of personal opinion, and is not only NOT falsifiable, it is more likely than not, based on the evidence. And more likely than not is the standard in a civil trial.
"Convicted of rape" means was found liable beyond any reasonable doubt. "Is a rapist" means quacks like a duck. And the pedo president quacks exactly like a duck. "I just walk up to 'em and grab 'em by the ******. Derp. Did you get that? You need me to repeat it? I'm gonna run for president one day."
I will laugh my *** off if the orange fatty tries to sue AOC.
But he won't. He won't.
I clicked out of maudlin curiosity.*Beekeeper » 16 Jul 2025, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ Seeing how you think you are going to "fix it" for me, you might want a few facts to help you along, rambus.
The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein - WSJ
Try his LAWYER that knows things YOU have no clue about. Then get back with us.
Oh, I absolutely agree - ya never do. I never do. He's as full of surprises as a chubby retarded 9 year old.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ I clicked out of maudlin curiosity.
How sad they can spin a *** like that, you ***.
It was not about sex. It was about blackmail.
Pretty sure there's a list, you easily gaslighted sack of stupid.
Interesting to learn that epstein's lawyer is your measure of credibility, you **** half a shaved ***.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, look - a squirrel.
This has WHAT to do with the fact that trump doesn't have the ball sac tosue AOC?
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ If you agreed with me, you insipid fruit, I would slit your wrists.
What - not my fault you're suicidal.
To you.
I can almost hear the sobbing as you say this ****. ^
Sorry, I was too busy answering fan mail, fruitcake.*Beekeeper » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Did you imagine what it would feel like if people actually agreed with you??

Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ I can almost hear the sobbing as you say this ****. ^![]()
Tamp it down and keep your nose to the stone, son.*Beekeeper » 16 Jul 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ When did I give you permission to talk like that to me?? Because that's way below my standard for a response.
No, I meant it to buck you up in your time of disappointment.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I meant it to buck you up in your time of disappointment.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I meant it to buck you up in your time of disappointment.