Hey Bub...you know the rules. Yer not supposed use "Insurrection" unless yer accusing a republican.
There is no reason ice agents should be plain clothed and wearing masks. We need our officers in uniform and identifiable.
How is that justice? The guy said honor your oath. How is it justice to arrest him for no crime?nefarious101 » 16 Jul 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ Sweet JustICE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5tzk5zCOeA
remember when the shoe was on the other foot during Covid? what **** hypocrites....
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom roadkill » 16 Jul 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Bub...you know the rules. Yer not supposed use "Insurrection" unless yer accusing a republican.

Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ How is that justice? The guy said honor your oath. How is it justice to arrest him for no crime?
If you are going to call that goon activity justice, tell us what crime the victim committed.
That camera guy wasn't rioting. He wasn't within a half mile of a riot. He was conducting a Constitutionally protected activity, filming in public and petitioning his public servants to honor their oaths.

I voted for Trump - it's not feelinglike a win, with masked hooligans snatching people off the street and pedophiles being protected by the president.
Agreed. This may be deemed somehow necessary short term (dubious conjecture), but clear designation needs to be used. Unmarked cars, people, etc. is only good for springing the trap. After that the uniforms better pop out.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ There is no reason ice agents should be plain clothed and wearing masks. We need our officers in uniform and identifiable.
I want Trump to keep his promise to protect our borders and to restore illegals to their home countries, absolutely. But that NEVER implied I want masked men, not even wearing uniforms, grabbing people randomly and without warrants, and disappearing them.
If you're gonna do a raid, do it in a uniform, with a badge. Otherwise, and reasonable person has a right to defend his life against a not police goon.
You think it's about "principle".Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ There is no reason ice agents should be plain clothed and wearing masks. We need our officers in uniform and identifiable.
I want Trump to keep his promise to protect our borders and to restore illegals to their home countries, absolutely. But that NEVER implied I want masked men, not even wearing uniforms, grabbing people randomly and without warrants, and disappearing them.
If you're gonna do a raid, do it in a uniform, with a badge. Otherwise, and reasonable person has a right to defend his life against a not police goon.
Speaking of you being a **** idiot:Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ You think it's about "principle".
You're a **** idiot
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
The simple fact is, anyone standing on American soil has a right to shoot and kill aggressors. Cops, no.DeezerShoove » 16 Jul 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Agreed. This may be deemed somehow necessary short term (dubious conjecture), but clear designation needs to be used. Unmarked cars, people, etc. is only good for springing the trap. After that the uniforms better pop out.
Otherwise this **** WILL come back and haunt all of us.
you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
You're a **** idiot to glean that **** from my post.Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ You think it's about "principle".
You're a **** idiot
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ The simple fact is, anyone standing on American soil has a right to shoot and kill aggressors. Cops, no.
Gang members, yes.
And the pretense in the gay communityof which neffie is a member that no actual citizen will ever be caught up in a raid? That's sandwich making gay, right there. That is gay homosexual queer, cubed, on steroids.
Getting the right to cheer for a police state is a nice trick by the fatimus orangutan.
Copies me again. Thereby proving he has no thoughts of his own.Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
Trump has been far more subdued than I would be when it comes to crashing federal agencies.DeezerShoove » 16 Jul 2025, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑ That type of dumb move is not limited to one side.
Remember "getting rid of the filibuster" stuff that harpy dems clamored for?
Corey Booker forget about that oh-so-important ****.
Defunding the police? Another great trendy buncha ****.
One thing I know WILL NOT be regretted in the future: Crashing the educational leviathan at the federal level.
That can only bring about improvements since it has consistently proven to be terrible at the national level.
Squashing that type of thing should be part of any threshold decision: Proven to be bad over time.
When some loudmouth is pissed about a singular event, you don't say, "Shut it all down!"
Impulse control is important. Like uniforms and badges.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ I voted for Trump - it's not feelinglike a win, with masked hooligans snatching people off the street and pedophiles being protected by the president.

nefarious101 » 16 Jul 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I see you're not used to laws being enforced.....
By nonpolice.