Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I thinksuspect you suffer from both - but it's not for me to say.
Take a nice long swim in lake beekeeper - physician, heal thyself.
I strongly suspect that it was for my attention. But only YOU can know your true motives.

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I thinksuspect you suffer from both - but it's not for me to say.
Take a nice long swim in lake beekeeper - physician, heal thyself.
Because you are stupid, you genuinely believe that placing a question mark behind a lie makes it a "question."*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ Did you say that for attention or insecurity? That's the question posed at you.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ Because you are stupid, you genuinely believe that placing a question mark behind a lie makes it a "question."
When you insist that there are only two possible motives for my actions, that is a lie.
When you challenge me to select one of the two false options, that is demanding that I honor your lie and participate in it.
I do not give way to lying. I call it out.
I am confident that you have been boxed in, yourself, by this sort of sleaze. And instead of calling it out, as a smart person might, you felt boxed in.You thought it quite clever. You decided to participate in this "clever" strategy, thinking it quite invincible.
The truth will always beat the lie, child. But you do not understand this, because you are stupid.
That you consider my pithy response a "long diatribe" speaks to your attention span and to the amount of discomfort and embarrasment it causes you.*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Long diatribes always lead down the path of insecurity.
Seated.*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑Trying to cover that up with wordy nothingness is one of the main ways phycologists determine your insecurities and how deep they are. Yours appears deep seeded.


Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ That you consider my pithy response a "long diatribe" speaks to your attention span and to the amount of discomfort it and embarrasment it caused you.
Suffering makes time drag a bit.
Seated.
It's deep seated - not seeded.
![]()
![]()
Said the wee fellow who in his very last post demanded that I select which of HIS WORDS were mine - with no intention of irony.
Son, you bring stupid to a new low.
No, child - on both counts.*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Your ego is bigger than life itself here. What's so funny is you THINK you control everyone here with your "I am smarter than thou" BS.
Ah, Jeez, der, Edith.
*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑Is your post directed AT ME for your attention or your insecurity in knowing that you don't have the ability to CONTROL ME??


Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ No, child - on both counts.
1. I do NOT think I control you. If I controlled you, you would be punching yourself for me.
2. My certainty that I am smarter than you is not "BS." You prove me right with every response.
Ah, Jeez, der, Edith.
![]()
![]()
You ran the exact same retarded lie, dumb ***. You beg me to choose between two false options, neither of which applies to my motivation.
You take dummy to a new place, dummy.![]()
![]()
Your stupidity is - in your retarded words -"deep seeded."
Obviously, dummy.
To you.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ Obviously, dummy.
To you.
To you it seems that way.
But we have established that you are stupid.
Your stupidity is "deep seeded."
Egomaniacal. You want the adjectival form, as you are modifying narcissism.
Well, son, if this is true, then it's a win all around. You should be happy. You're winning.*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑is in desperate need of satisfaction. It's why you never "win". Except in your own mind that is. To others, we just laugh at you.
Otherwise, you would have nothing to say.
Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Egomaniacal. You want the adjectival form, as you are modifying narcissism.
That, or a hyphen between egomaniac and narcissism.
Just sayin.
Well, son, if this is true, then it's a win all around. You should be happy. You're winning.
Okay. Thanks for the footwear, bro.
Lucky you!
Okay, buddy.*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑Bringing facts and objective opinion isn't a "win" for anyone. Except for you it seems, because you totally love to berate anyone that has a differing one than you and expresses as much. Truth and facts ALWAYS win. Opinion is only limited to your own ideology and some version of "facts" that may or may not be present.