Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
But…but…that’s going against the FweE MaukeT
But…but…that’s going against the FweE MaukeT
By LowIQTrash
17 Jul 2025 9:14 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Jul 2025 12:56 pm
He's about 85 trade agreements short...*GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Jul 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not OK with you to address more than one issue at a time when it's a Republican President who was capable of handling this simple matter with a phone call.
Let your Butt Hurt flow...!!!
Do you expect this to lower the price of Coke?
18 Jul 2025 1:38 pm
Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ He's about 85 trade agreements short...
Do you expect this to lower the price of Coke?
Hunter Biden does.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Jul 2025 2:09 pm
Any truly woke company like Coca Cola should have voluntarily "done the right thing" to keep their flock of SJW imbibers as healthy as can be..Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ He's about 85 trade agreements short...
Do you expect this to lower the price of Coke?
18 Jul 2025 2:39 pm
This is ****.DeezerShoove » 18 Jul 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ I very rarely look at this stuff but this caught my eye (perhaps because I recalled this thread):
Corn. It's about corn...
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2025/ ... t-tariffs/
It was about protecting the bet ADM made on HFCS.
18 Jul 2025 4:58 pm
Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you know how much sugar we import?
Do you know anything about US price support for sugar?
Yes and there is a tariff that protects domestic sugar production.
The "cost" is minimal. Around a billion a year.
Next.
Maybe you would like a lot of FACTS before you go out on some hate-filled tirade and name calling BS that never gets you anywhere. IF you want a DISCUSSION, we can do that. OTHERWISE, keep your opinion to yourself without a factual basis to support it.
Domestic Production:
- The US produces sugar from both sugarcane and sugar beets.
- Sugarcane accounts for roughly 40-45% and sugar beets 55-60% of domestic sugar production, according to the USDA.
- The US ranks as the world's third-largest importer of sugar, despite producing a significant amount domestically.
- The US utilizes a system of tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) to manage sugar imports.
- These TRQs restrict the amount of sugar that can be imported from certain countries, often based on historical trade patterns, according to the USDA.
- Most imported sugar is raw cane sugar, which needs to be refined for use in food products.
- The US imports sugar from numerous countries, with the Dominican Republic, Brazil, and the Philippines holding the largest shares.
- The US sugar program aims to support domestic producers by limiting foreign competition and increasing prices for consumers.
- This can result in higher costs for food processors and consumers who use sugar in various products.
- The Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates the program costs the US economy around $1 billion per year, according to the GAO.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 4:59 pm
It means you're lying like the left does. That matters if you want to win against them.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 5:00 pm
Mrkelly » 18 Jul 2025, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑So tRump could get sugar put into coke AND expose pedos Cletus?
Does calling people "Cletus" make you feel better about yourself?? Are you that small that you need to make yourself be big with name calling??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 5:01 pm
Mrkelly » 18 Jul 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑what about the kids Cletus… don’t you care?
Excessive sugar intake poses significant health risks, including weight gain, increased risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and certain types of cancer. It can also negatively impact mental health, contributing to depression and mood swings. Furthermore, high sugar consumption is linked to dental problems, skin issues, and even Alzheimer's disease
Supporting the change to sugar means that I care. I care that we have healthier kids and far less diabetics.
I can care about more than one thing, which, based on your very own diatribe, you are unable to do.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 5:04 pm
Awwwwww*Beekeeper » 18 Jul 2025, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Does calling people "Cletus" make you feel better about yourself?? Are you that small that you need to make yourself be big with name calling??
did I hurt you widdle feelings Cletus?
18 Jul 2025 5:07 pm
There a difference between an honest mistake and a deliberate lie.*Beekeeper » 18 Jul 2025, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ It means you're lying like the left does. That matters if you want to win against them.
Coke WAS part of AB at one time and whether or not that is still true has nothing at all to do with my comment about a woke company like Coke not being "woke enough" to have switched already to cane sugar.
18 Jul 2025 5:11 pm
*GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Jul 2025, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑ There a difference between an honest mistake and a deliberate lie.
Coke WAS part of AB at one time and whether or not that is still true has nothing at all to do with my comment about a woke company like Coke not being "woke enough" to have switched already to cane sugar.
I clarified that Coke was never part of InBev. One BOTTLER in Africa was. PERIOD!!
Facts matter. You can call them "woke" all you want, that doesn't mean they ever belonged in any part to InBev. The overwhelming number of companies owned by InBev are beer and other alcohol producers.
No, Coca-Cola has never been owned by InBev or Anheuser-Busch InBev (AB InBev).
However, there was a point in time when AB InBev, through its acquisition of SABMiller, came to own a majority equity stake in Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA), the largest Coca-Cola bottler in Africa.
This was a short-lived situation. On October 4, 2017, The Coca-Cola Company completed the acquisition of AB InBev's 54.5% equity stake in CCBA, making Coca-Cola the controlling shareowner. This move was driven by Coca-Cola's desire to protect its supply chain and prevent AB InBev's influence over its bottler, especially considering AB InBev bottles PepsiCo products in Latin America.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 5:29 pm
Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ This is ****.
It was about protecting the bet ADM made on HFCS.
Gosh, you're smart.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
18 Jul 2025 5:56 pm
If you want to be a stickler for every last bit of minutia...read my original post again.*Beekeeper » 18 Jul 2025, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I clarified that Coke was never part of InBev. One BOTTLER in Africa was. PERIOD!!
Facts matter. You can call them "woke" all you want, that doesn't mean they ever belonged in any part to InBev. The overwhelming number of companies owned by InBev are beer and other alcohol producers.
All I did was put [[[AB inbev]]] in parenthesis..without any mention of how much or how little Coke is related to them.
Jeezeus Dude...get a **** grip....
Then there is this...... "However, there was a point in time when AB InBev, through its acquisition of SABMiller, came to own a majority equity stake in Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA), the largest Coca-Cola bottler in Africa."
18 Jul 2025 6:31 pm
You read Breitbart.
I held a trademark on this symbol....
30 years ago.
18 Jul 2025 6:32 pm
Do you know why?*Beekeeper » 18 Jul 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes and there is a tariff that protects domestic sugar production.
18 Jul 2025 7:07 pm
An article caught my eye... You're really desperate for a gotcha.Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2025, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You read Breitbart.
I held a trademark on this symbol....
30 years ago.
wow. So smart... A real apex predator, you are...
btw
Was I supposed to swoon at a trademark? Sorry.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
18 Jul 2025 7:36 pm
See the reply, It answers fully your question.
Do you really think your incessant questions are effective in making any kind of point?? Discussion requires that YOU answer them as well, and you don't, so we have reached a point where you either get in the discussion with answers or you try other tactics to appease your narcissism. I refuse to play your games.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 7:41 pm
*GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Jul 2025, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑ If you want to be a stickler for every last bit of minutia...read my original post again.
All I did was put [[[AB inbev]]] in parenthesis..without any mention of how much or how little Coke is related to them.
Jeezeus Dude...get a **** grip....
Then there is this...... "However, there was a point in time when AB InBev, through its acquisition of SABMiller, came to own a majority equity stake in Coca-Cola Beverages Africa (CCBA), the largest Coca-Cola bottler in Africa."
It wasn't owned by Coca Cola. That's the point. As many bottlers of Coke products are NOT owned by Coke. They are independent bottlers of Coke products and buy syrup ONLY from them. Perhaps cans/bottles too. A good friend of mine in college, his Dad was a Coke bottler in our hometown. That's how I know this to be factual.
Do better than the left. That's all that is needed. They lie constantly. They make "mistakes" intentionally and try to get cover. YOU can do better than that and have in the past. That's the point you seem to be missing here.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
18 Jul 2025 7:41 pm
That is the most excellent news I have heard in a long time! I don't drink coke, but I DO want my fellow citizens to be protected from corn syrup.LowIQTrash » 17 Jul 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Imagine how the retarded conjobs would have responded to this if Magik Negro Obama attempted this
(But BAMMY didn’t coz Wall St)
https://www.zerohedge.com/food/trump-sa ... cane-sugar
Like Trump, I am a believer in big government!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
18 Jul 2025 7:42 pm
And a bad move forUS corn syrup producers.*Beekeeper » 17 Jul 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Imagine what it would feel like if you had more than that echo chamber you live in and actually had to find some facts before you could post!!
The reality is, it's a good move for both Coco Cola AND the US Sugar producers.
You hypocritcal little queer, If obama had forced coke to change its formula your tears would have taken the form of a river.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 5706 users online :: 10 registered, 14 bots, and 5682 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckGo, NING, MQQBrowser, okhttp, proximic, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot