C'mon man, buck up and swoon...DeezerShoove » 18 Jul 2025, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑ An article caught my eye... You're really desperate for a gotcha.
wow. So smart... A real apex predator, you are...
btw
Was I supposed to swoon at a trademark? Sorry.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Don't forget corn palaces...Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2025, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ We don't import ANY HFCS. This is gonna be a real blow to America's precious farmers.
It'll send the corn belt into a death spiral.They'll have to get a new market.
Let's see... They're already indog food - because when ya think dog, ya think wild packs hunting corn. They're in cereal. They're in gas. They're in coke. Well-notforlong, thanks toTrump.
I guess we'll just have toput MORE corn in the gas. Grow baby grow! Plant baby plant! Harvest baby harvest!

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You aren't capable of such.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ Then you can let me know when you are ready to have a real conversation.
DeezerShoove » 19 Jul 2025, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ Whatever you need to think. That's you. Stay wedded.
Unlike you, I feel no need to maintain a narrative.
I can take in something from multiple viewpoints.
btw
I have NEVER seen that trademark on anything.
That's crap, Coozie...you sing from the same hymnal as idiots like Zeet and Beefondler..Unlike you, I feel no need to maintain a narrative.I can take in something from multiple viewpoints.
You just saw it on my label, idiot.I have NEVER seen that trademark on anything
Then you know whom not to ask.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Answering your multitude of irrelevant questions isn't something I'm willing to entertain.
johnedgarslowhorses avatar johnedgarslowhorses -2 10 minutes ago
Instead, it's more likely that individual companies or organizations might have their own specific variations of "No HFCS" logos or symbols that they use and potentially register as trademarks for their own products or brands.*Beekeeper » 18 Jul 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Facts say differently.
Several different food manufacturers use "No HFCS" or "No HFCS" logos on their products to indicate that their products are free of high-fructose corn syrup. However, there doesn't appear to be a single, universally trademarked "No HFCS" symbol that's owned by one specific entity and used by all companies.
Instead, it's more likely that individual companies or organizations might have their own specific variations of "No HFCS" logos or symbols that they use and potentially register as trademarks for their own products or brands.
For example, Tulkoff Food Products uses a "NO HFCS" logo on their products after removing high-fructose corn syrup from their ingredients. However, this doesn't necessarily mean they hold a trademark on a universal symbol for all "No HFCS" products.
Facts suggest how life should socially evolve. Genetic outcomes show how it actually works in plain sight.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ Instead, it's more likely that individual companies or organizations might have their own specific variations of "No HFCS" logos or symbols that they use and potentially register as trademarks for their own products or brands.
so **** g'ddammned stupid
Instead, it's more likely that individual companies or organizations might have their own specific variations of "No HFCS" logos or symbols that they use and potentially register as trademarks for their own products or brands.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ The facts say that no "symbol" has ever been trademarked.
You're claiming you "had" one.
That's indisputable facts your "stupid" claim isn't going to dismiss.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ Instead, it's more likely that individual companies or organizations might have their own specific variations of "No HFCS" logos or symbols that they use and potentially register as trademarks for their own products or brands.
your citation says you're lying.
Your social justification character matters says you are denying all you were since a fertilized cell evolved into the body you're occupying time with now. You defend your contextual soul of interpretation, not your sole time adapting one of a kind.Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ Instead, it's more likely that individual companies or organizations might have their own specific variations of "No HFCS" logos or symbols that they use and potentially register as trademarks for their own products or brands.
your citation says you're lying.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑ That's crap, Coozie...you sing from the same hymnal as idiots like Zeet and Beefondler..
You just saw it on my label, idiot.
Your head remains nailed to the floor.
Don't presume.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ It's pretty easy to validate YOUR claim. Seeing how the US Patent office issues letters and often certificates of patents, trademarks, and copyrights.
Either you post it or move on. It's that simple.
I don't deal in your claims; I deal in facts.
Brevity, Coozie...strive for it.DeezerShoove » 19 Jul 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ Oh no...
Trademark Genius, please don't condemn me like that.
Your imagined power and imagined intellect and imagined accomplishments . . .
It's all too much.![]()
You masturbated to your mother's panties...
Shouldn't have done that. . . tsk tsk tsk