What does that have to do with Brevity, Slizzy?DeezerShoove » 19 Jul 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ You have more than 4 times my number of posts, Trademark Genius.
Scramble... Find a new tack.
It's not in anyone's best interest to make a "deal" with someone that doesn't keep the ones they made in the past.Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ Don't presume.
You're a moron.
I dig up confirmation, and you spend the rest of 2025 posting as "BV'sBitch".
Deal?
That's the better part of ****, Fondler.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ It's not in anyone's best interest to make a "deal" with someone that doesn't keep the ones they made in the past.
Nothing.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ What's in your "deal" for ME if you fail to produce the document with the EXACT same image on it as you claim you own the trademark on??
Nice try, wee queer. He asked FROM THE OVAL OFFICE.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ The facts say otherwise. There are no government efforts to ban it. Trump made an ask, not any government order.
Another nice try. We are a net exporter of HFCS by a country mile, sonny.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ US imports of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) are declining, with a forecasted decrease from 50.5 thousand short tons in 2023 to 41.26 thousand short tons in 2028.
So in the face of that brutal reality, Trumpy takes a big **** on the high fructose corn syrup mines, knocking millions and millions of miners out of work.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ US High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) production has generally decreased since its peak in the late 1990s. While production reached 9.5 million tons in 1999, it has since trended downward, with recent estimates around 7.5 million tons. This decline is attributed to various factors, including increased consumer awareness of health concerns, a shift towards natural sweeteners, and competition from other sweeteners like refined sugar.
Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ Nice try, wee queer. He asked FROM THE OVAL OFFICE.
If it were Obama, you would be on the same page with me. Because I would be saying the same thing. You, on the other hand...
Another nice try. We are a net exporter of HFCS by a country mile, sonny.
So in the face of that brutal reality, Trumpy takes a big **** on the high fructose corn syrup mines, knocking millions and millions of miners out of work.
What an america hater!.
Again, hypoocrite, everyone on this board knows that if obama "asked," you would be squealing.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ It doesn't matter if Trump asked from his golden toilet, It wasn't an EO, nor a suggested piece of legislation. He asked. Doesn't mean that anyone has to do as he asked. It's why there were options. Coca Cola chose to take the suggestion. That requires no scrutiny from you or anyone. If you think that gives you power over people, you are delusional. When anyone in this nation ASKS something, there are 2 options- yes, or no.
Get clear, fruit. I SUPPORT TRUMP'S ASK. I BELIEVE IT SHOULD BE AGAINST THE LAW TO POISON PEOPLE, you stupid ****. I would support an EO.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ No one is going to get hurt here and until you can produce evidence that they will or have, you're bloviating isn't lining up with reality.
****. Ethanol is so dirty that 10% is the max that cars can even handle. WE SHOULD NEVER BURN FOOD. We have OIL for that, you leftist scum.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ The reason- and one that is factual- HFCS can be easily turned into ethanol and there is tremendous demand for that, and no one gets "harmed" as a farmer.
Look, *******. If the corn WON'T sell, farmers can change crops. This isn't about the farmers - it's about your hypocrisy.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑Corn is still being bought, used, and the end product sold at a profit. Seems you're hindsight isn't working as foresight. Even that same corn can be turned to feed for livestock and that helps everyone as that ALSO is a net export. So many options you are overlooking here and fact based one, not some speciaous BS.
Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2025, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Again, hypoocrite, everyone on this board knows that if obama "asked," you would be squealing.
Get clear, fruit. I SUPPORT TRUMP'S ASK. I BELIEVE IT SHOULD BE AGAINST THE LAW TO POISON PEOPLE, you stupid ****. I would support an EO.
I just don't support ignoring your hypocrisy.
****. Ethanol is so dirty that 10% is the max that cars can even handle. WE SHOULD NEVER BURN FOOD. We have OIL for that, you leftist scum.
Look, *******. If the corn WON'T sell, farmers can change crops. This isn't about the farmers - it's about your hypocrisy.
You're clearly too stupid to understand that taking a different position on a thing depending on who is doing the thing is hypocritical. Do not even TRY to deny that if Obama had used the presidency to strong arm coke, you would be squealing like the bitch your mama raised.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ I've offered no hypocrisy. Unless you have evidence of that, you're dismissed.
You're the one too stupid to understand tongue in cheek sarcasm.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ YOU'RE the one that claimed "it will hurt the farmers" and you bolstered that with "I thought Trump was for the farmers".
I can't take a position on a hypothetical anything.Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ You're clearly too stupid to understand that taking a different position on a thing depending on who is doing the thing is hypocritical. Do not even TRY to deny that if Obama had used the presidency to strong arm coke, you would be squealing like the bitch your mama raised.
You would not be pursing your little lips and mewling, "It was an ask." You would be raising hell about comnism and socha lizum.
You're the one too stupid to understand tongue in cheek sarcasm.
See? You're stupid.
Right. On accounta you bein' stupid and all.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ No one but Trump did anything here. No obambam, no Hitlery, No Cackles, no Autopen. So your point is moot.
You shoudl thank me - me putting words in your mouth might scooch that kosher-cut dick outta there.*Beekeeper » 19 Jul 2025, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ And once again, you are attempting to put words in MY MOUTH, THAT I NEVER SAID!!
Ahhhh. So you think that lashing out in pure tempest rage is going to win your losing argument?? Because the reality is, your response here only validated my entire statement!!Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2025, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ See? You're stupid.
What would your position be if Trump got caught raping a baby?
You can't say - it's hypothetical. You **** skifooza maroon.
Right. On accounta you bein' stupid and all.
You shoudl thank me - me putting words in your mouth might scooch that kosher-cut dick outta there.
See? You're stupid.*Beekeeper » 20 Jul 2025, 5:25 am » wrote: ↑Ahhhh. So you think that lashing out in pure tempest rage is going to win your losing argument?? Because the reality is, your response here only validated my entire statement!!Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2025, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ See? You're stupid.
What would your position be if Trump got caught raping a baby?
You can't say - it's hypothetical. You **** skifooza maroon.
Right. On accounta you bein' stupid and all.
You shoudl thank me - me putting words in your mouth might scooch that kosher-cut dick outta there.
How does it make you feel knowing that this is all your narcissistic self has left in life is to berate others your view as "below me"??
Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ See? You're stupid.
What would your position be if Trump got caught raping a baby?
You can't say - it's hypothetical. You **** skifooza maroon.
Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ See? You're stupid.
What would your position be if Trump got caught raping a baby?
You can't say - it's hypothetical. You **** skifooza maroon.
No, no. Geography does not determine intellect. Honesty does. Abe Lincooln was raised in the woods of Illinois - the same state where Obama spent most of his life. Very different people, though. Geography ain't it, son.*Beekeeper » 20 Jul 2025, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Wow!! Did you mean for your insults to be something that people view you as "the big guy" here??
It's funny you mention that, because most of the time when I respond to you, I am laughing.*Beekeeper » 20 Jul 2025, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Ask everyone here. It appears you fail. It must be really tough being you with all that anger inside and no one around that it lands on.
I thinksuspect you suffer from both - but it's not for me to say.*Beekeeper » 20 Jul 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑Attention or insecurity??Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ See? You're stupid.
What would your position be if Trump got caught raping a baby?
You can't say - it's hypothetical. You **** skifooza maroon.