*Huey » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ That's right.
This isn't about your irrelevant diversion.
Your comment WASN'T "about the 9mm"..
Melty,
Have a liedown.
*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ *Huey » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat. And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.
BV's reply:
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480
Just applying your logic.
You said LIKE THE COLT AR 15, ya lying lil bitch
As a man would (that excludes bitches like you) I am posting your own words, unedited, verbatim, in context with a link.
So now your lie is that when replying to a post about the 9 mil being designed for combat you water saying the 5.56 is like the Colt Ar 15.
Bit h, you can’t even lie intelligently. No wonder you needed a legacy admission. If it weren’t for that you would have went to Devry,
This is about "intermediate rounds" DEVELOPED for combat..*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ *Huey » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.
Define "triggered"Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like we both triggered Mary. I got him to prove that he was a stalker. He checkmated himself.![]()
![]()
@Blackvegetable
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ This is about "intermediate rounds" DEVELOPED for combat..
Not about "pistol rounds" INSPIRED FOR" (whatever the **** that means) combat.
Never get a nickel. VF apologises for the misprint, rightly points out that only an absolute idiot could mistake that person for Trump, shows side by side contemporaneous photos of the real Trump and that catamite to prove it is impossible to mistake the two, and prints a retraction.
Where the phook is the ;law enforcement you unleashed on me in your report?
you lookin' in the mirror, brown?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom All my links are from what I directly post...JohnnyYou » 20 Jul 2025, 5:26 am » wrote: ↑ I have seen your links.. Usually there is no sausage in them and the meat maker is questionable.
You wouldn't trust Wikipedia for the history of Peanut Butter Cookies
History no spam (1864–1943), an American no spam educator, from Alabama's no spam , was the most well known promoter of the no spam as a replacement for the no spam crop, which had been heavily damaged by the no spam . He compiled 105 peanut recipes from various no spam , agricultural bulletins, and other sources. In his 1925 research bulletin called How to Grow the Peanut and 105 Ways of Preparing it for Human Consumption, he included three recipes for peanut cookies calling for crushed or chopped peanuts.[1]It was not until the early 1930s that no spam was listed as an ingredient in the cookies.
Hmmm.. I gotta clean out the spam now?
History
George Washington Carver (1864–1943), an American agricultural extension educator, from Alabama's Tuskegee Institute, was the most well known promoter of the peanut as a replacement for the cotton crop, which had been heavily damaged by the boll weevil. He compiled 105 peanut recipes from various cookbooks, agricultural bulletins, and other sources. In his 1925 research bulletin called How to Grow the Peanut and 105 Ways of Preparing it for Human Consumption, he included three recipes for peanut cookies calling for crushed or chopped peanuts.[1]
It was not until the early 1930s that peanut butter was listed as an ingredient in the cookies.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom No ****, dummy - because no one cares enough to file suit. There is literally no way that caption is going to convince anyone with any sense that the kid in the photo is Trump. In the law, where there is no harm, there is no foul.
But it remains Sweet Donnie.Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No ****, dummy - because no one cares enough to file suit. There is literallyno way that caption isgoing toconvince anyone with any sense that the kid in the photo is Trump.
Of course it does, darling. Of course it does.
That's the same "logic" @GHETTO BLASTER offers...Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course it does, darling. Of course it does.
And the democ rats didn't use it against him in THREE elections, because they are too high-minded!
What is your alternative explanation, Skippy?
Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ What is your alternative explanation, Skippy?
It is clear that you GENUINELY BELIEVE your delusion that you have photos of trump in a dog collar or whatever it was. Photos of Trump as the OBVIOUS dial-a-date/boy-toy of a disgusting and debouched old jew.
I have seen no evidence that it gave you paroxysms when the democ rats failed to use this important evidence in order to discredit Trump with his maga base. So you MUST be in the know.
Tell us why this photo proving Trump a trifling little gay whore was never used against him by the democ rats. Did hillary just suffer from "too much class"? And Biden? And that black gal that used to suck off willie brown and his buddies? NONE OF THE THREE were willing touse this damning evidence to humiliate Trump?
Just be honest with yourself, son. You're stupid.You're credulous as a young girl.
"Here's a really **** theory....tell me why it's ****."Tell us why this photo proving Trump a trifling little gay whore was never used against him
brown must think democrats have standards with some places they just won't go...Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ What is your alternative explanation, Skippy?
It is clear that you GENUINELY BELIEVE your delusion that you have photos of trump in a dog collar or whatever it was. Photos of Trump as the OBVIOUS dial-a-date/boy-toy of a disgusting and debouched old jew.
I have seen no evidence that it gave you paroxysms when the democ rats failed to use this important evidence in order to discredit Trump with his maga base. So you MUST be in the know.
Tell us why this photo proving Trump a trifling little gay whore was never used against him by the democ rats. Did hillary just suffer from "too much class"? And Biden? And that black gal that used to suck off willie brown and his buddies? NONE OF THE THREE were willing touse this damning evidence to humiliate Trump?
Just be honest with yourself, son. You're stupid.You're credulous as a young girl.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom