Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 12:13 pm

Until you read your ****, I won't.

Look at prediction 3. You did it again. So **** stupid. 


1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

@Blackvegetable  so **** stupid. 

Vegas » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
31 minutes ago
1. Prove a negative...etc...God you are one predictable mother ****.

Your reply

"Prove I didn't"

              

 
 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 12:18 pm

@Blackvegetable  so **** stupid. 

Your reply

            

Then prove you did.

You are subject to your own rules, right?
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 12:29 pm

Then prove you did.

You are subject to your own rules, right?

Prove I did what? You can only prove that you answered after being asked the first time. It's impossible to prove you didn't. That's a negative. 

I didn't make a **** claim to prove. 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 1:07 pm

Prove I did what? You can only prove that you answered after being asked the first time. It's impossible to prove you didn't. That's a negative. 

I didn't make a **** claim to prove.

Must you answer after being asked the first time, consistently?

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:36 am

1) 1 defendant is deceased, the other has been convicted.

2) you people are **** idiots 

3) I grow weary of correcting the false premises

You have the wrong topic.

**** idiot.

Oh, it's the right topic...funny you didn't recognize it changed...since you did it...
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 1:11 pm

Must you answer after being asked the first time, consistently?

I do with other members, consistently. I refuse to do that with you because you CONSISTENTLY evade every single member on this forum. You cherry pick one example. Seriously? Out of the 5 million questions you have evaded, you boast about one. And you can't even prove that you answered that one the first time asked. 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 1:24 pm

I do with other members, consistently. I refuse to do that with you because you CONSISTENTLY evade every single member on this forum. You cherry pick one example. Seriously? Out of the 5 million questions you have evaded, you boast about one. And you can't even prove that you answered that one the first time asked.

because you CONSISTENTLY evade every single member on this forum

Prove it.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 1:42 pm

Prove it.

    Would you like me to start a poll? I don't think you will like the results. 

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm

    Would you like me to start a poll? I don't think you will like the results.

A poll isn't proof.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 11:43 am

Neither.

It is a statement of fact.

Because you got butthurt and call people "stupid", "moron", "idiot" doesn't mean you stated ANY facts.

What that means is, you have an opinion and one that is easily proven false. Which has been done so many times, the entire forum has lost count. We can take a survey and determine if that FACT is valid if you want.

And THAT is how you establish a FACT!! You making a claim proves only that you aren't getting away with your continual crap any longer. And byased on YOUR response, that makes you butthurt AND angry!!

And "morons", "idiots", and "stupid" people aren't able to formulate such eloquent and articulate points and sentences as I have displayed here. Which is another FACT you are welcome to attempt to refute if you think you can. Besides, we would all love to hear your vapid attempt to do so in your usual 5-9 word sentences that have ZERO structure or content/context.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 1:59 pm

A poll isn't proof.

Maybe not, but it would be hilarious.     

Look...you already know anyway. That's good enough for me. I couldn't care less what is good enough for you. 

*Beekeeper » 23 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm

Because you got butthurt and call people "stupid", "moron", "idiot" doesn't mean you stated ANY facts.


 

To whom do you insist I have applied it in error?

Vegas » 23 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm

Maybe not, but it would be hilarious.     


 

What will prove hilarious will be the Cavalcade of Butthurt.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 3:28 pm

To whom do you insist I have applied it in error?

Do you think that no one can name names here?? Start with anyone you want, and I can assure you; they are far smarter than you and far more adroit at posting facts and reality than you ever will be. That makes them intelligent, highly informed, adept at writing and expressing themselves and the ideas at hand!! That's nowhere CLOSE to being "an idiot", "moron", "stupid" or any other attempts to insult or denigrate you try without success.

Did that trigger you? Again?

*Beekeeper » 23 Jul 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 3:35 pm

Do you think that no one can name names here?? 

I see no names.

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 5:13 pm

I see no names.

Man, can't we just file the Epstein Shyt in the Circular File?  Like the JFK crap?

If that shyt stayed like a semen stain on Bondi's desk I would have been fine with it.

Beyond "The List" have we helped red blooded Txans recovering from a flood?

JohnnyYou » 23 Jul 2025, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 5:25 pm

Man, can't we just file the Epstein Shyt in the Circular File?  Like the JFK crap?

If that shyt stayed like a semen stain on Bondi's desk I would have been fine with it.

Beyond "The List" have we helped red blooded Txans recovering from a flood?

No....it induces a MAGAt schism...

What we SHOULD do is arm both camps...

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 3:30 pm

What will prove hilarious will be the Cavalcade of Butthurt.

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Jul 2025, 5:28 pm

No....it induces a MAGAt schism...

What we SHOULD do is arm both camps...

youtube /watch?v=JfOnymA9eW4 


Drive Joe's Corvettte