Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 20 Jul 2025, 4:53 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 4:53 am

No, you're wrong...I always support my statements with a link and you do as well when asked (when you're not BS-in'...   )

I have seen your links.. Usually there is no sausage in them and the meat maker is questionable.

You wouldn't trust Wikipedia for the history of Peanut Butter Cookies

History no spam  (1864–1943), an American  no spam  educator, from Alabama's  no spam , was the most well known promoter of the  no spam  as a replacement for the  no spam  crop, which had been heavily damaged by the  no spam . He compiled 105 peanut recipes from various  no spam , agricultural bulletins, and other sources. In his 1925 research bulletin called How to Grow the Peanut and 105 Ways of Preparing it for Human Consumption, he included three recipes for peanut cookies calling for crushed or chopped peanuts.[1]It was not until the early 1930s that  no spam  was listed as an ingredient in the cookies.

Hmmm..  I gotta clean out the spam now?

History
George Washington Carver (1864–1943), an American agricultural extension educator, from Alabama's Tuskegee Institute, was the most well known promoter of the peanut as a replacement for the cotton crop, which had been heavily damaged by the boll weevil. He compiled 105 peanut recipes from various cookbooks, agricultural bulletins, and other sources. In his 1925 research bulletin called How to Grow the Peanut and 105 Ways of Preparing it for Human Consumption, he included three recipes for peanut cookies calling for crushed or chopped peanuts.[1]

It was not until the early 1930s that peanut butter was listed as an ingredient in the cookies.
 
 

ROG62 » 20 Jul 2025, 4:53 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 4:53 am

No, you're wrong...I always support my statements with a link and you do as well when asked (when you're not BS-in'...   )

Lying coward.

@ROG62  

It appears I am no longer allowed to post links which will make it difficult for me to give you a one click path to my evidence.
You'll have to copy and paste them in your browser which even I would not like to do for anyblob  on this rag.

Even I am skeptical that peanut butter did not exist before 1925 on reading the above post.

AI Cross Check.... Yeah I guess you may be right..  Wikipedia gives credit to the black  man.

AI Overview
Peanut butter, as a concept and in early forms, has roots in ancient South America. The Incas and Aztecs are credited with grinding roasted peanuts into a paste. In the United States, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg patented a process for making peanut butter in 1895. It was later introduced to the public at the St. Louis World's Fair in 1904. 

en.wikipedia /wiki/Peanut_butter_cookie

ttps://en.wikipedia /wiki/Peanut_butter_cookie

At least I can still tag..  Thanks     @Deezer Shoove  

 
 

JohnnyYou » 20 Jul 2025, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 5:39 am

@ROG62  

It appears I am no longer allowed to post links which will make it difficult for me to give you a one click path to my evidence.
You'll have to copy and paste them in your browser which even I would not like to do for anyblob  on this rag.

Even I am skeptical that peanut butter did not exist before 1925 on reading the above post.

AI Cross Check.... Yeah I guess you may be right..  Wikipedia gives credit to the black  man.

AI Overview
Peanut butter, as a concept and in early forms, has roots in ancient South America. The Incas and Aztecs are credited with grinding roasted peanuts into a paste. In the United States, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg patented a process for making peanut butter in 1895. It was later introduced to the public at the St. Louis World's Fair in 1904. 

en.wikipedia /wiki/Peanut_butter_cookie

ttps://en.wikipedia /wiki/Peanut_butter_cookie

At least I can still tag..  Thanks     @Deezer Shoove

Is that cocksucker @Deezer Shoove  **** with your settings?

He cuddles @*VegasVagina's balls.

But don't call him "bitter"...he hates that.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 5:48 am

Is that cocksucker @Deezer Shoove  **** with your settings?

He cuddles @*VegasVagina's balls.

But don't call him "bitter"...he hates that.

Who's bitter?       




--



btw
Have you ever posted anything positive or mildly amusing?

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 4:37 pm

You are too much of a ****** to cite them with the same frequency that you rely on them.

Now tell me what you've proven about VF..

vanity fare?

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 12:59 pm

You have been answered, Tiny.

No, I have not.  Because the correct answer is you are referring to 9 mm.  You are on record as saying 9 mm is inappropriate for civilian use.  You are a lying, ignorant ****.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2025, 7:58 am

....and, damn....there goes Antonio Sabato, Jr...
 

There are a 1000 reasons why the the Trump may have decided to NOT disclose the Epstein "lists", and NONE of them are necessarily hypocritical NOR a "Cover up"... lets just WAIT and see what happens.. BECAUSE, IGNORANT CORRUPT and BIASED Liberal Democrats (like you) are currently LOOKING for ANY STRAW in the pile of hey (called the Epstein fiasco), and calling it a needle...

TRUMP has already shown himself to be INFINITELY more Believable, Honest , and Trustworthy than ANY Democrat... and I WILL give him the benefit of the doubt !

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 10:08 am

No, I have not.  

You have.

You are lying...
Again.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 11:15 am

You have.

You are lying...
Again.

No, I have not.  Because the correct answer is you are referring to 9 mm.  You are on record as saying 9 mm is inappropriate for civilian use.  You are a lying, ignorant ****.

sorry, you forgot some.  You left out the important bits.  Plus, I posted your words, unedited, in context, VERBATIM, and with a link.

Keep lying ,****.  And I will keep bumping that thread.  In your **** face ArmsLength.

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:28 pm

sorry, you 

I don't answer to your version of what I said.


You are notorious for a lack of literacy.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:30 pm

I don't answer to your version of what I said.

You are notorious for a lack of literacy.

The problem, Bitch, is I posted your versions.  Here it is again:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic

**** off ya lying bitch.

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:33 pm

The problem, Bitch, is I posted your versions.  Here it is again:

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

Just applying your logic

**** off ya lying bitch.

I don't see me talking about 9mm.

I don't see myself making refernce to "pistol rounds".

The AR-15 and the NATO 5.56 are a matched set.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:52 pm

I don't see me talking about 9mm.

I don't see myself making refernce to "pistol rounds".

The AR-15 and the NATO 5.56 are a matched set.

 

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

I was talking about the 9 mil.  What weapon is “like the Colt Ar 15 and optimized for combat?

Stop being a ****** bitch, ****.  Answer the question, Bitch.  Or get your daughter to answer it.  

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:52 pm

I don't see me talking about 9mm.

I don't see myself making refernce to "pistol rounds".

The AR-15 and the NATO 5.56 are a matched set.

You don't see anything. 

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:56 pm

I was talking about the 9 mil.  

No...you used it as an example....it was a diversion.

 

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:57 pm

You don't see anything.

I see you conspicuously stalking me.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:58 pm

No...you used it as an example....it was a diversion.

 

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Lying Bitch, what is like the Colt AR 15 and optimized for combat?

answer Bitch.  You are a **** ****** in all contexts.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:58 pm

I see you conspicuously stalking me.

Prove I have a folder of you saved on my computer with 6 years old quotes. 

Yeah, that's what I thought. 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 1:58 pm

I see you conspicuously stalking me.

No, lying bitch, I am watching you run from your words:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

What is like the Ar Colt AR 15, Cowardly Lying Bitch?  No wonder you live alone.