Liberal Forum

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm

No, lying bitch, I am watching you run from your words:

What is like the Ar Colt AR 15, Cowardly Lying Bitch?  No wonder you live alone.

The NATO 5.56 round.

You've been answered mutiple times.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm

The NATO 5.56 round.

You've been answered mutiple times.

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm

Prove I have a folder of you saved on my computer with 6 years old quotes. 

Yeah, that's what I thought.

That is irrelevant to your obsessive stalking.

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

 

Neither A, B nor D satisfy my definition....for reasons you cannot be made to understand. 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:04 pm

That is irrelevant to your obsessive stalking.

The **** it is. Quoting you vs spending hours in a member's profile digging **** up...and then having it neatly saved on your computer? You can't possibly think the two are the same. 

Actually, you are pretty **** stupid. So maybe you do.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:05 pm

Neither A, B nor D satisfy my definition....for reasons you cannot be made to understand.

Post your answer already. Give me a reason to prove you wrong. 

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:06 pm

The **** it is. 

It has absolutely nothing to do with stalking...

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:08 pm

It has absolutely nothing to do with stalking...

    This is exactly what a stalker would say. 

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:06 pm

Post your answer already. Give me a reason to prove you wrong.

After you press your face to the dirt and beg forgiveness for your impertinence ....
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:10 pm

After you press you press your face to the dirt and beg forgiveness for your impertinence ....

**** moron. Just admit that you are clueless already. Get it over with. 

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:10 pm

    This is exactly what a stalker would say.

 No...a stalker, like a narcissist, would refuse to acknowledge their pathology. 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm

The NATO 5.56 round.

You've been answered mutiple times.

Your words:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

In response to my comments on the 9 mil.  You are a lying **** wannabe.  What the **** is wrong with you, Lying Bitch?

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:11 pm

 No...a stalker, like a narcissist, would refuse to acknowledge their pathology.

Which is exactly what you are doing. 

Checkmate. 

*Huey » 20 Jul 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:12 pm

Your words:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

In response to my comments on the 9 mil.  You are a lying **** wannabe.  What the **** is wrong with you, Lying Bitch?

That's right.

This isn't about your irrelevant diversion.

Your comment WASN'T "about the 9mm"..

Stop being a ****** bitch, ****. Answer the question, Bitch. Or get your daughter to answer it

Melty,

Have a liedown.

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:12 pm

Which is exactly what you are doing. 

Checkmate.

Under no accepted definition do I stalk.

Your behavior defines it.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:17 pm

Under no accepted definition do I stalk.

Your behavior defines it.

Same could be said for your behavior. Yet, like the narcissist that you are, your own rules don't apply to you. 

Again, checkmate. 

Sheeeshh...come on man. I already nuked you. Get back to survivorship bias. Chop chop.

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:19 pm

Same could be said for your behavior. 

No....it can't. 

You're obsessed...

I have repeatedly humiliated you, exposed you as a moron and made a cruel joke of your claim of "slaying giants".

I can hardly blame you.

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:24 pm

No....it can't. 


 

Yes...it can. 


 

Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:25 pm

Yes...it can.

Then do it....with references. 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:26 pm

Then do it....with references.

Your claim, your job...with reference. 

You are the one that is claiming that me quoting you is no different than you creeping around member's profiles for hours and hours and hours. 

Get to it. Chop chop.