Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ Great perspective. I don't know if this applies here though. We are talking about powerful people, that are part of the deep state, who have major influence over the global economy, policies, laws, and elections. These aren't just street pervs looking for a good time.
It's real easy to get caught up in the "pitch forks and torches" mentality here...DeezerShoove » 20 Jul 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I have said similar type stuff as well.
BlaVe proves this for me by stalking me back to April . . . in the Agent Orange thread.
The "list" ain't the money shot. It's just an embarrassing place to have your name pop up.
Proof of something terrible is a deeper dive.
I think it will be next to impossible to sort this situation out unlessCannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ If I misread your questions, I apologise. Let's start fresh:
Dammit, Jim, I am a voter - not a policeman.
I voted for a fellow who promised to out the sex pests whoring our sons and daughters to the elite perverts that run the West.
You seem now to be suggesting that it cannot be done - too involved. Just let the matter go. You appear to be insisting that in order to express disappointment and disagreement with being lied to by the liar in chief, I have to put on my prosecutor hat, my investigator hat, and my tort litigator hat, and then answer a barrage of questions designed to justify letting elite perverts off the hook.
I suppose one rhetorical question deserves another, so here goes: Are you suggesting that Trump's DOJ is led by an incompetent trollop who was hired for her tits? That she is not up to the task of investigating a case where she has ACTUAL VIDEO FOOTAGE OF THE CRIMINALS COMMITTING THE CRIME?
Followup question - are you planning to start a drive to recall Pam Bondi and put a **** man in there?
Rudy Giulianni brought down the **** mafia with grainy video and gravelly audio. Do we REALLY need high-res, close-up "money" shots to prosecute sex pests?*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it will be next to impossible to sort this situation out unless
Epstein kept high quality videos of all the action....this is quite possible. Video good enough to positively ID the children.
Wait. They'll try to DEFEND themselves? OMG - call the whole thing off.*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ A possible excuse for the defendants will be "Not all the sex toys were under age so how was I to know I was having sex with a minor...?"

An END run??? He's the *** who said he would release them. This **** isn't Bondi's decision - it's Trump's.*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Once a couple key figures get burned it would be amazing how that might get some of the rats to turn against each other.
We get a tougher, more courageous Prosecutor who is willing to take a bullet for this cause and do an end run around Trump....this will never happen.
I'm not discerning in this response any reason why the Epstein Files should not be released.*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ This is one reason why the [[[JWO]]] launched Women's Lib back in the 1970s...to make it easier for the bad guys to get away with **** thanks to so many cowardly liberal female judges and prosecutors that now head our legal system.
Why does this have to be an all or nothing deal...?Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑
I'm not discerning in this response any reason why the Epstein Files should not be released.
Youcan't hide Trump behind a broad when Sheriff Pointer has his scent, son.
Are we still discussing the fact that Trump is covering for sex pests, acting as accessory after the fact to their crimes?*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Why does this have to be an all or nothing deal...?
Build an air tight case and prosecute them one by one as the opportunities arise.

Same with murderers. Is revenge bringing anyone back from the dead?DeezerShoove » 20 Jul 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Another parallel is illegal drug use.
Some say going after the user solves very little.
Other claims are that the dealer is the real problem. Ratchet up the efforts...
Still others will claim we have to get the "big guys" like CIA, foreign governments, etc.
Where is the solution in the end?
---
Pedo Island
In a similar vein, is jailing the "user" solving the problem?
Intermediary?
Get the "big guys"... Who is that?
Where is the solution? Is mere revenge enough?
I know.*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ It's real easy to get caught up in the "pitch forks and torches" mentality here...
I have way, way too much integrity to lower myself to defending my own integrity, sonny.nefarious101 » 20 Jul 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ noticed you didn't include yourself either...but!!!....neither did I
Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I have way, way too much integrity to lower myself to defending my own integrity, sonny.

I can't slip NUTHIN past THIS guy! He's sharp as a bobby pin.
Sorry, but I cannot be bothered by this twaddle right now.nefarious101 » 20 Jul 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ not lowering your integrity would require you not saying something and placing yourself above it all
What about now?

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't slip NUTHIN past THIS guy! He's sharp as a bobby pin.
Sorry, but I cannot be bothered by this twaddle right now.
There are some children drowning somewhere, and I have to go find them and save them.
What about now?

Is that really a category?nefarious101 » 20 Jul 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Well...I see it more as a lack of self-control than anything else
almost in the bitter old woman category....almost
Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ How do you view your relationship with online porn addiction?
Is that really a category?
I know about the whole MILF craze - I've always had a weakness for hot mommies, myself.
Differents strokes for different folks, I guess...

This is awkward.nefarious101 » 20 Jul 2025, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The "Bitter Old Woman" category is hard to qualify for....you might want to up your game
I'm rooting for ya!
I daresay there's more likely to be a kinship among drug users and a kinship among pedos...Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Same with murderers. Is revenge bringing anyone back from the dead?
We need to focus on root causes. Like envy, for example. Try to get people to just "be better."
Maybe preach the Gospel more?
Why go after individual murderers? Murder is STILL gonna happen.
what do you see more as “lack of self control? ?nefarious101 » 20 Jul 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Well...I see it more as a lack of self-control than anything else
almost in the bitter old woman category....almost
Character career social identity role playing rather than ancestor adapting in linear time relativity since birth, occupying space specifically alive, now is a hoax of a social identity, not ancestral time alive spontaneously present as just another ever changing body inhabiting space daily here never same details twice with each added heartbeat since the zygote form shaped after conception.Vegas » 20 Jul 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ This is what happens when you pick and choose what you want to read and hear ^^^
Hey moron, simply because Trump said that Epstein is a hoax doesn't mean that Epstein is a hoax.
She's in a bit of an upset. Don't look for her to make a lot of sense.